Web shake-up could force ALL websites to treat us like children: Users could be made to prove their age for almost every page they visit under controversial new plans
- New laws from the Information Commissioner have been labelled as draconian
- Web firms will now have to introduce strict new age checks on their websites
- If websites don’t introduce checks, they will have to treat all users as children
- Adam Smith Institute’s Matthew Lesh said the laws were ‘infantilising’ web users
The information watchdog has been accused of ‘infantilising’ web users, in a draconian new code designed to make the internet safer for children.
Web firms will be forced to introduce strict new age checks on their websites – or treat all their users as if they are children, under proposals published by the Information Commissioner’s Office today.
The rules are so stringent that critics fear people could end up being forced to demonstrate their age for virtually every website they visit, or have the services that they can access limited as if they are under 18.
The information watchdog’s new code has been accused of ‘infantilising’ web users by some experts
They may have to log in every time they visit an online shop, browse holidays online or look at commercial news websites, critics argue.
Critics also warned that the rules would severely damage the online advertising business, threatening the provision of free web services such as online news websites and chat forums including Mumsnet and TripAdvisor.
Companies that do not stick to the code face fines of up to 4 per cent of their global turnover – £1.67billion in the case of Facebook.
The radical proposals are designed to protect children using the internet, according to the Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham.
Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham is behind the new laws, which will enforce strict new age checks or treat all users as children
Baroness Kidron – a campaigner for child safety online who was instrumental in ensuring the code is backed by law – said: ‘For too long we have failed to recognise children’s rights and needs online, with tragic outcomes.
‘I firmly believe in the power of technology to transform lives, be a force for good and rise to the challenge of promoting the rights and safety of our children. But … it must consider the best interests of children, not simply its own commercial interests.’
But experts fear the measures could badly backfire.
They said the proposals could make web users’ data more vulnerable, because their browsing history could potentially be linked to their identity and misused by unscrupulous operators.
It would mean internet users could have to give personal information, such as credit card or passport details, to every website they visit, unless it is guaranteed child-friendly, which could be a security risk.
Matthew Lesh, of free market think-tank the Adam Smith Institute, said: ‘[The ICO] is an unelected quango introducing draconian limitations on the internet with the threat of massive fines. It is ridiculous to infantilise people and treat everyone as children… It is really up to parents to keep their children safe online.’
The code, which applies to virtually every website that makes money online, is under consultation. The finalised version will come into force as early as the autumn.
The code is the second assault on web firms to be accused of going too far. Last week a row erupted over the Government’s Online Harms White Paper, amid fears that it paved the way for totalitarian-style censorship.
The document laid out plans for a new internet watchdog which would have the power to block websites from the internet in Britain if they did not adhere to its rules.