Spending is out of control at four in 10 NHS hospitals and organisations amid claims they ‘aren’t listening’ to budget experts, damning report reveals
- The National Audit Office revealed 38 per cent of bodies are concerning auditors
- Failing to make big enough savings and overspending are risking tax money
- Value for money is not good enough at hospitals and local NHS bodies
- The NHS has been accused of ‘not listening’ to budgeting experts
NHS spending is out of control at nearly four in 10 hospitals and local bodies, according to Government inspectors.
The National Audit Office, which scrutinises public spending, called the findings in its report ‘shocking’ and accused the NHS of ‘not listening’ to experts.
And the problem is getting worse – the number of hospitals being criticised by auditors for failing to balance their books and overspending has risen by a third in two years.
The damning figures come after the NHS last week announced a plan for how it would spend a promised £20.5billion budget boost amid warnings the money would sink into covering day-to-day costs and debts.
The National Audit Office found 38 per cent of all local NHS organisations are struggling to balance their books and raising serious concerns about value for money (stock image)
Both major hospitals and local sections of the health service came under fire in the NAO’s report.
Some 36 per cent of hospital trusts filed accounts which raised concerns about their finances – a rise from 26 per cent two years ago, The Telegraph reported.
And 32 per cent of clinical commissioning groups – which run local health services – had worrying spending levels, more than triple the 10 per cent two years ago.
‘This is not good enough,’ said Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office.
He added: ‘I am shocked by the persistent high level of qualified audit reports at local public bodies.
‘A qualification is a judgement that something is seriously wrong, but despite these continued warnings, the number of bodies receiving qualifications is trending upwards.
‘Let us hear no cries of “where were the auditors?” when things go wrong. The answer will be “they did the job, but you weren’t listening”.’
HOW WILL THE NHS’ 10-YEAR PLAN SAVE LIVES?
The NHS and Government say their new 10-year plan will save up to 500,000 extra lives over the next decade.
This is how they hope to do it:
- Using more high-tech treatments and diagnostic testing, including computers with artificial intelligence, to prevent 150,000 heart attacks, strokes and dementia cases
- Putting 100,000 people with heart complaints through healthy living and exercise programmes every year, with a view to preventing 23,000 premature deaths
- Improving diagnosis to catch 75 per cent of all cancer cases ‘early’ while they’ll still respond well to treatment – the figure is currently 50 per cent
- DNA testing for around 30,000 people who have dangerously high cholesterol due to genetic causes
- Investing an extra £4.5bn a year in primary and community care, reducing pressure on hospitals
- Investing an extra £2.3bn a year in mental health services and giving help to an two million more people suffering from anxiety, depression and other mental health problems
The NAO’s report assessed the accounts of NHS trusts and local councils across the country to see how many had been flagged up by auditors.
Councils were far better performing than the NHS, with only eight per cent of them causing concerns about value for money.
Overspending in the health service risks wasting taxpayers’ money and reducing their confidence in the organisation, the NAO said.
It warned some places had ‘significant weaknesses in their governance’.
Most cases in which NHS bodies were reported involved them not making big enough savings and missing their financial targets.
Meg Hillier, an MP for Hackney in London and the chairman of the Committee of Public Accounts, said: ‘It is deeply concerning that local auditors are raising increasing numbers of concerns about local bodies’ arrangements to secure value for money, but these are often not being listened to and there is no consequence for the local bodies themselves.
‘With ever stretched public services, citizens deserve to know that there are effective arrangements in place to make sure they are getting value for money.’
Last week NHS bosses laid out their plan for how a £20.5billion budget boost would be spent as it is phased in before 2024.
Promises of tailored cancer care for children, improving testing and treatment for heart attacks and strokes, and more preventative healthcare were headline-grabbers.
But analysts have warned the £20.5bn could just be eaten up by the rising costs of caring for the elderly, hiring more staff and paying for more expensive drugs.