The PM could quit in MAY if it gets Eurosceptic Tories to vote for her deal

Theresa May is finalising her Plan B for Brexit tonight as her Trade Secretary warned Remain MPs they cannot ‘hijack’ Parliament to ‘steal’ the 2016 referendum result.

The Prime Minister has spoken to her Cabinet by conference call as she prepares for a crucial day tomorrow when she must set out her next steps. 

Because her Brexit deal was crushed by 230 votes on Tuesday Mrs May must now table a new motion in Parliament – and MPs can attempt to re-write the plans. 

It means tomorrow’s move by the PM will set the stage for a new showdown in the Commons on January 29 when MPs will vote on a series of Brexit plans. 

One possible that emerged today was a bilateral treaty with Ireland about keeping open the Irish border – intended to replace the backstop plan in the current divorce deal loathed by Brexiteers. Dublin has already said no.  

Ahead of Mrs May’s statement to MPs tomorrow, it emerged several groups of Remain rebels want to use the votes to suspend the normal rules of Parliament and force through new laws to prevent a no deal Brexit.

The procedural manoeuvres prompted Liam Fox to warn the rebels against any attempt to ‘hijack the Brexit process’.  

It was even claimed today the Prime Minister could offer to resign as soon as May to win over Brexiteers to her deal under ideas from her top aide Gavin Barwell. 

Mrs May has not signed up to the timetable but amid revolt over her deal before Christmas did accept she would quit ahead of the 2022 election. 

Trade Secretary Liam Fox (pictured today on the Marr show) warned Remain MPs they could no ‘steal Brexit from the people’ today amid plots for Parliament to seize control of negotiations 

Theresa May (pictured with husband Philip attending church today) could offer to resign as soon as May to get Brexit deal through Parliament under plans being promoted by her chief of staff, it was claimed today

Theresa May (pictured with husband Philip attending church today) could offer to resign as soon as May to get Brexit deal through Parliament under plans being promoted by her chief of staff, it was claimed today

Dr Fox told the BBC’s Andrew Marr: ‘You’ve got a leave population and a remain Parliament, Parliament has not got the right to hijack the Brexit process because Parliament said to the people of this country we make a contract with you, you will make the decision and we will honour it.

‘What we are now getting is some of those who always absolutely opposed the result of the referendum trying to hijack Brexit and in fact steal the result from the people.’

Dr Fox added: ‘It can’t have it back they (Parliament) said we cannot or will not make a decision on this, you the British people will make the decision.’

The Cabinet minister said the political consequences of going back on the referendum result would be ‘astronomical’.

Dr Fox hinted the Government could back the idea of a side deal with Ireland to resolve the backstop question that has deadlocked negotiations and is hated by Brexiteers.

Downing Street slams plan by MPs to seize control of Brexit  

Downing Street hit out at moves by rebel MPs to rewrite the Commons rule book in an attempt to derail Britain’s withdrawal from the EU.

The two groups of MPs are said to be planning to table amendments to enable backbench MPs to take control of the business of the House to frustrate Theresa May’s Brexit plans.

One group led by Tory former minister Nick Boles and the senior Labour MP Yvette Cooper is attempting to block a no-deal Brexit – something Mrs May strongly opposes.

However The Sunday Times reported that a second group led by the former attorney general Dominic Grieve wants to go further and suspend the Article 50 withdrawal process.

Downing Street described the moves as ‘extremely concerning’ and said they underlined the need for MPs who supported Brexit to vote for it in the House.

‘The British public voted to leave the European Union and it is vital that elected politicians deliver upon that verdict,’ a No 10 spokeswoman said.

‘Any attempt to remove the Government’s power to meet the legal conditions of an orderly exit at this moment of historic significance is extremely concerning.

‘This news should serve as a reminder to those MPs who want to deliver Brexit that they need to vote for it – otherwise there is a danger that Parliament could stop Brexit.’

He told Marr he was in favour of ‘a different mechanism’ to resolve the Irish border question and said he wanted to ‘explore ways’ to achieve that with the Irish government and EU. 

Ireland has already rejected the idea, Sky News reported today. 

Dr Fox admitted not all of the EU’s existing trade deals would be ready for exit day.

He said: ‘They’re not ready and signed but they’re well in train, actually there are 37 agreements, only 34 of which are in operation, and if you add Australia and New Zealand mutual recognition, you would get back to 36.

‘We signed the first of those on Friday, we sign another one next week and we hope to sign the Switzerland deal, which is the most important of all of those particular agreements, within the next few weeks.

‘These total agreements represent about 11.6% of our total trade, the bottom 21 of them represent about point eight of 1%, so there are a relatively small number.

‘The top five of those represent about three quarters of that total and we’re confident that we will be able to get those agreements over the line.’

A source told the Sunday Times, the idea of the Prime Minister offering to quit in May or June was being discussed by her team. 

It would allow for an orderly Brexit and give time for a Tory leadership contest – but end hopes of Mrs May shaping a post-Brexit legacy.

The source said: ‘The response came back that while the chief herself had not thought about it, the team around her had.’ 

Former Brexit secretary Dominic Raab also warned against extending Article 50 today. 

He told Sky News’ Sophy Ridge On Sunday programme, said: ‘If there’s an attempt to reverse the referendum, stop Brexit altogether I think that would cut across not only the democratic mandate, the biggest in history we had.

‘I think also if you look at current public opinion and how it’s shifted by two to one as I said people want us to respect the referendum.’

Warning ‘we can’t let the EU bully us or call the shots’, Mr Raab went on to say that to break the deadlock with Brussels the negotiating team should be changed.  

The idea has been proposed by Gavin Barwell (left with Michael Gove in Downing Street on Thursday), Mrs May's top aide, and been discussed with at least two Cabinet ministers

The idea has been proposed by Gavin Barwell (left with Michael Gove in Downing Street on Thursday), Mrs May’s top aide, and been discussed with at least two Cabinet ministers

What is the Irish border backstop and why do Tory MPs hate it?

The so-called Irish border backstop is one of the most controversial parts of the PM’s Brexit deal. This is what it means: 

What is the backstop? 

The backstop was invented to meet promises to keep open the border between Ireland and Northern Ireland even if there is no comprehensive UK-EU trade deal.

The divorce deal says it will kick in automatically at the end of the Brexit transition if that deal is not in place.

If effectively keeps the UK in a customs union with the EU and Northern Ireland in both the customs union and single market.

This means many EU laws will keep being imposed on the UK and there can be no new trade deals. It also means regulatory checks on some goods crossing the Irish Sea. 

Why have Ireland and the EU demanded it? 

Because Britain demanded to leave the EU customs union and single market, the EU said it needed guarantees people and goods circulating inside met EU rules.

This is covered by the Brexit transition, which effectively maintains current rules, and can in theory be done in the comprehensive EU-UK trade deal.

But the EU said there had to be a backstop to cover what happens in any gap between transition and final deal.  

Why do critics hate it? 

Because Britain cannot decide when to leave the backstop. 

Getting out – even if there is a trade deal – can only happen if both sides agree people and goods can freely cross the border.

Brexiteers fear the EU will unreasonably demand the backstop continues so EU law continues to apply in Northern Ireland.  

Northern Ireland MPs also hate the regulatory border in the Irish Sea, insisting it unreasonably carves up the United Kingdom. 

What concessions did Britain get in negotiating it? 

During the negotiations, Britain persuaded Brussels the backstop should apply to the whole UK and not just Northern Ireland. Importantly, this prevents a customs border down the Irish Sea – even if some goods still need to be checked.

The Government said this means Britain gets many of the benefits of EU membership after transition without all of the commitments – meaning Brussels will be eager to end the backstop. 

It also got promises the EU will act in ‘good faith’ during the future trade talks and use its ‘best endeavours’ to finalise a deal – promises it says can be enforced in court.

What did the legal advice say about it? 

Attorney General Geoffrey Cox said even with the EU promises, if a trade deal cannot be reached the backstop could last forever.

This would leave Britain stuck in a Brexit limbo, living under EU rules it had no say in writing and no way to unilaterally end it.  

He said: ‘For all the great work the civil servants have done, I think to close this deal it needs to be politically led and driven so taken into control of the politicians.’ 

On the attempts to get the EU to drop backstop demand – which Brexiteers say Mrs May has failed to do personally – Mr Raab added: ‘I raised it in July with Michel Barnier who accepted then that the backstop would have to be short.

‘Unfortunately I think after that we didn’t follow up and I argued very strongly that we should do.’

Earlier, Dr Fox wrote in the Sunday Telegraph today that those on the opposite side of the debate must not cancel Brexit. 

He adopted Mrs May’s warning that last week’s devastating defeat of the deal must move on and the Rebels must ‘tell us what they do want’.  

Dr Fox said: ‘Failure to deliver Brexit would produce a yawning gap between Parliament and people, a schism in our political system with unknowable consequences.

‘The reaction of the Question Time audience could become a political tsunami. It is time for MPs to deliver on the promises they made.

‘It is a matter of honour and a matter of duty.’    

Amid the warnings, a senior Cabinet minister told the Sunday Express Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd, justice secretary David Gauke and Business Secretary Greg Clark back a second referendum

 The minister said: ‘They would do anything to stop Brexit.’

The minister added: ‘The fear is that Labour will pivot to supporting a second referendum. 

The minister also accused Brexiteers of ‘overplaying their hand’ and warned that the likelihood is that Parliament and the Government will ‘go for something softer’.

The minister went on: ‘I think if there is a majority view in the Cabinet it is that we commit to a customs union of some sort and I suspect that is where we will end up.

‘The Cabinet in some ways reflects the party over not being clear which way to go except we don’t have any [Brexiteer] hardliners any more. Penny [Mordaunt] and Andrea [Leadsom] are much more pragmatic Brexiteers.

‘We have legislation which will have to go through and that can be amended to stop no deal and to have a second referendum.’ 

Labour MP Rupa Huq, a supporter of the Best for Britain campaign, said: ‘The Prime Minister can make the ultimate sacrifice if she wants but it won’t make her bad Brexit deal any better.

‘At the moment she is in office and not in power. But I do have to say the idea that her Chief of Staff is running round telling the cabinet, half of whom are openly plotting to take her job, that she has go is just awful. It looks like the ultimate betrayal. 

‘This plotting shows why we need to go back to the people.’ 

Downing Street hit out at moves by rebel MPs to rewrite the Commons rule book in an attempt to derail Britain’s withdrawal from the EU.

The two groups of MPs are said to be planning to table amendments to enable backbench MPs to take control of the business of the House to frustrate Theresa May’s Brexit plans. 

Former Brexit secretary Dominic Raab (pictured today on Sky News) warned against extending Article 50 process amid the current deadlock

Former Brexit secretary Dominic Raab (pictured today on Sky News) warned against extending Article 50 process amid the current deadlock

One group led by Tory former minister Nick Boles and the senior Labour MP Yvette Cooper is attempting to block a no-deal Brexit – something Mrs May strongly opposes.

However The Sunday Times reported that a second group led by the former attorney general Dominic Grieve wants to go further and suspend the Article 50 withdrawal process.

Downing Street described the moves as ‘extremely concerning’ and said they underlined the need for MPs who supported Brexit to vote for it in the House.

‘The British public voted to leave the European Union and it is vital that elected politicians deliver upon that verdict,’ a No 10 spokeswoman said.

‘Any attempt to remove the Government’s power to meet the legal conditions of an orderly exit at this moment of historic significance is extremely concerning.

‘This news should serve as a reminder to those MPs who want to deliver Brexit that they need to vote for it – otherwise there is a danger that Parliament could stop Brexit.’ 

What Brexit options could MPs vote on now May’s deal has failed?

More than half a dozen Cabinet ministers are pushing for Parliament to vote on ‘options’ for how to proceed if Theresa May’s deal fails.

Here are some of the possibilities that could be considered:

NORWAY PLUS

MPs from across parties have been mooting the idea of a Norway model.

It would effectively keep the UK in the single market, with a customs bolt-on to avoid a hard Irish border, and backers say it would keep Britain close to the EU while cutting contributions to Brussels.

However, critics say it has the drawbacks of keeping free movement, – and tightly limiting the possibilities for doing trade deals elsewhere.

The EU is also thought to have concerns about a country the UK’s size joining the EEA, while other states in the group might be resistant.

SECOND REFERENDUM 

The so-called ‘People’s Vote’ campaign has been pushing hard for another national vote, with cross-party backing.

MPs would almost certainly want to be asked to back the idea in principle. 

The Article 50 process would probably need to be extended to facilitate a referendum, but the EU seems open to that possibility.

However, the biggest problem is likely to be that even if the Commons can agree on holding a vote, they will be be completely split over the question.

Some want it to be a rerun of 2016 with Remain v Leave. Others say it should be May’s deal against no deal.

There are also those who support two rounds of voting, or multiple choice. 

CANADA PLUS

Brexiteers have been demanding the UK takes a different approach this time, seeking a looser Canada-style arrangement with the EU. 

The arrangement they want would be a relatively clean break from the EU, with the ability to strike trade agreements elsewhere.

But it would fall far short of the low-friction access urged by Labour and large numbers of Tories. 

MANAGED NO DEAL

Brexiteers have been floating a ‘managed’ no deal which could feature in the votes.

It would involve the UK offering the EU billions of pounds to secure a transition period, even if there is no wider deal.

However, there is little sign that the EU is ready to agree. 

 

Read more at DailyMail.co.uk