Steve Bannon was indicted by a grand jury on Friday after he defied a subpoena to testify before the House’s select committee on the January 6th Capitol attack
President Donald Trump’s former top strategist Steve Bannon was indicted by a federal grand jury on Friday for defying a subpoena to testify before the House’s select committee on the January 6th Capitol attack.
Two charges of contempt of Congress were filed against Bannon, a former White House staffer, over his refusal to appear before Congress and give up documents in the probe.
A judge issued an arrest warrant and he is expected to surrender in Washington D.C. on Monday to appear in court, 26 days after the House voted to send his criminal referral to the Justice Department.
‘Since my first day in office, I have promised Justice Department employees that together we would show the American people by word and deed that the department adheres to the rule of law, follows the facts and the law and pursues equal justice under the law,’ said Attorney General Merrick Garland in a statement announcing the indictment. ‘Today’s charges reflect the department’s steadfast commitment to these principles.’
If convicted, Bannon could face as little as 30 days or up to one year in prison on each count. Fines range between $100 and $1,000.
Just moments before the charges were announced and likely before he was informed, Bannon told his War Room podcast listeners: ‘Remember, there are no whining and no tears in the War Room.
‘We’re taking action and that action is we’re taking over school boards, we’re taking over the Republican Party through the precinct committee strategy. We’re taking over all the elections.’
Bannon’s lawyer Robert Costello his client would not comply with any committee requests because Trump had directed him not to and argued that any testimony being sought was protected by executive privilege.
Trump’s former chief of staff Mark Meadows, who also defied his testimony by refusing to appear on Friday, is also using the executive privilege argument and is being loyal to Trump.
GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger, one of two Republicans on the committee, told CNN as the news broke that he hopes Bannon’s indictment sends a ‘chilling message’ to other witnesses who are considering ignoring subpoenas.
It is the second time Bannon has been indicted in 15 months. In August 2020 he was charged with duping thousands of donors who believed their money would help build Trump’s wall, but the former president pardoned him the night before Joe Biden’s inauguration.
Congressional investigators said they were interested in hearing from Bannon, who has been a private citizen since 2017, because he reportedly communicated with Trump on December 30, telling the president he should focus his energy on January 6, when Congress was set to certify President Joe Biden’s election.
According to journalist Bob Woodward, Bannon was among the Trump allies who met the day before January 6 MAGA riot at the Willard Hotel.
At a so-called ‘war room’ meeting at the property, Bannon and Trump lawyer John Eastman were among those trying to pressure Vice President Mike Pence into tossing out electoral vote counts from states where Trump was falsely claiming voter fraud.
Eastman tried to push a fringe legal theory that because Pence was presiding over the count he could pick and choose slates of electors.
The select committee said that Bannon was quoted saying on January 5 that ‘all hell is going to break loose tomorrow.’
Bannon’s indictment is unique, NBC News reported, as no individual has ever been charged with contempt of Congress when executive privilege has been asserted.
The privilege claim, however, came from Trump.
Additionally, past defendants have been pressed to testify about their government service.
Bannon hadn’t been a White House official for several years by the time he met with the president’s allies on January 5.
Beyond Bannon, Mark Meadows is facing criminal contempt of Congress charges for refusing to appear for testimony in front of the January 6 committee on Friday.
Bannon’s lawyer Robert Costello his client would not comply with any committee requests because Trump had directed him not to and argued that any testimony being sought was protected by executive privilege. Trump and Bannon are pictured together in 2017
Panel chairman, Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson, wrote to Meadows’ attorney on Thursday night to say there is ‘no valid legal basis’ for Meadow’s noncompliance with panel’s subpoena and gave him until 10am on Friday to respond.
Meadows defied the request and now could be the second Trump ally to be potentially hit with charges after the House referred Bannon’s to the Department of Justice last month.
The next step will be for Congress to hold a vote over whether to give Meadows a criminal refer in a move the Democratic majority will likely pass.
The White House counsel’s office told Meadows he had no claims of privilege to avoiding appearing before the committee and on Thursday Thompson warned that Meadows could face criminal charges if he doesn’t appear.
‘The Select Committee will view Mr. Meadows’s failure to appear at the deposition, and to produce responsive documents … as willful non-compliance. Such willful noncompliance with the subpoena would force the Select Committee to consider invoking the contempt of Congress procedures,’ Thompson noted, ‘which could result in a referral from the House of Representatives to the Department of Justice for criminal charges.’
Meadows’ attorney George Terwilliger has said his client ‘remains under the instruction of former President Trump to respect longstanding principles of executive privilege.’
‘Legal disputes are appropriately resolved by courts,’ said Terwilliger said in a statement Friday morning. ‘It would be irresponsible for Mr. Meadows to prematurely resolve that dispute by voluntarily waiving privileges that are at the heart of those legal issues.’
The House committee investigating the January 6th insurrection in the Capitol told former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows that he must appear for his deposition at 10 am on Friday or he will be considered in contempt of Congress.
The panel had said it was subpoenaing Meadows because he was within the ‘vicinity’ of Donald Trump on Jan. 6, and had communications with Trump and others ‘regarding the events at the Capitol’ and ‘are a witness concerning events that day’
White House deputy counsel Jonathan Su wrote to George Terwilliger to tell him of the finding.
‘The President believes that the constitutional protections of executive privilege should not be used to shield information reflecting an effort to subvert the Constitution itself, and indeed believes that such an assertion in this circumstance would be at odds with the principles that underlie the privilege,’ Su wrote.
Biden ‘has determined that he will not assert executive privilege with respect to your client’s deposition testimony on these subjects, or any documents your client may possess that bear on them,’ Su noted. ‘For the same reasons, underlying his decisions on executive privilege, President Biden has determined that he will not assert immunity to preclude your client from testifying before the Select Committee.’
Thompson noted that finding in his letter to Terwilliger, writing the ruling from Biden’s White House counsel on the matter ‘eviscerates any plausible claim of testimonial immunity or executive privilege, and compels compliance with the Select Committee’s subpoena.’
But Terwilliger suggested in a statement earlier Thursday – after receiving Su’s letter but before Thompson’s letter – that Meadows would not comply with the committee’s demands until the legal disputes were resolved.
‘Contrary to decades of consistent bipartisan opinions from the Justice Department that senior aides cannot be compelled by Congress to give testimony, this is the first president to make not effort whatsoever to protect presidential communications from being the subject of compelled testimony,’ he wrote.
‘Mr. Meadows remains under the instruction of former President Trump to respect longstanding principles of executive privilege. It now appears the courts will have to resolve this conflict,’ he noted.
Trump has ordered his former aides not to cooperate with the House committee’s probe.
The committee has subpoenaed Meadows and at least 35 others in their investigation into what happened at the White House on January 6 and the efforts to overturn the election results.
The House Select Committee to Investigate the Jan. 6th Attack on the Capitol issued its first subpoenas on September 21 – targeting Meadows, former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon, longtime Trump and White House aide Dan Scavino, and former Pentagon chief of staff Kash Patel.
Meadows featured prominently in Trump’s efforts to pressure state official in Georgia and other states where Trump pushed claims of election fraud as part of his election overturn effort.
‘While serving as White House Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows reportedly communicated with officials at the state level and in the Department of Justice as part of an effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election or prevent the election’s certification,’ according to the committee release on the subpoena.
The Meadows letter says it appears he was within the ‘vicinity’ of Trump on Jan. 6, and had communications with Trump and others ‘regarding the events at the Capitol’ and ‘are a witness concerning events that day.’
Mark Meadows, a former congressman, served as Trump’s chief of staff in the final days of the administration – above the two men are seen together in November 2019
It also cites documents already obtained from the Justice Department, and states that ‘while you were the President’s Chief of Staff, you directly communicated with the highest officials at the Department of Justice requesting investigations into election fraud matters in several states.’
Bannon also refused to comply with his subpoena and was held in contempt of Congress.
The House voted 229 to 202, mostly along party lines, on October 27 to find Bannon in contempt, which sent the matter to the Justice Department. DoJ will decide whether or not to prosecute Bannon.
Thompson has also threatened contempt against Jeffrey Clark, a former Justice Department official who helped orchestrate Trump’s effort to subvert the 2020 election results.
Thompson’s letter to Meadows on Thursday comes hours after a blow to the committee’s investigation of what happened the day thousands of Trump supporters swarmed the Capitol to try and stop the certification of Joe Biden’s presidential victory.
A federal appeals court blocked the imminent release of Trump’s records – including his White House calls and activities related to the Jan. 6 attack – after a lower court found that Biden can waive his predecessor’s claim to executive privilege.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit granted a temporary injunction while it considers Trump’s request to hold off any release pending appeal.
The case was fast-tracked for a hearing Nov. 30.
Trump DEFENDS supporters who shouted ‘hang Mike Pence’ during Capitol riot, insists the chant was ‘just common sense’ and says he thought VP would be safe because he was ‘in good shape’ in newly released interview
Donald Trump has defended supporters who threatened to ‘hang’ then-Vice President Mike Pence during the Capitol riot on January 6 because they were angry about voter fraud allegations in a newly released audio clip of an interview.
During a taped interview with ABC News’ Jonathan Karl, obtained by Axios, Trump can be heard playing down the chanted threats, saying ‘the people were very angry.’
In the clip, Karl initially asks whether Trump was worried about his Vice President.
‘No, I thought he was well-protected, and I had heard that he was in good shape,’ Trump replies during the interview for Karl’s book ‘Betrayal’ at Mar-a-Lago, conducted on March 18. ‘No. Because I had heard he was in very good shape.’
‘Because you heard those chants — that was terrible,’ Karl replies. ‘He could have — well, the people were very angry,’ Trump says.
‘They were saying ‘hang Mike Pence,” Karl pushes.
‘Because it’s common sense, Jon. It’s common sense that you’re supposed to protect,’ Trump replies. ‘How can you — if you know a vote is fraudulent, right?’ he says, touting the false claim that the 2020 presidential election was fraudulent.
‘How can you pass on a fraudulent vote to Congress? How can you do that?’
The chants were heard as Trump’s supporters laid siege to the Capitol building in Washington DC on January 6 following a rally held by the then-president outside the White House, forcing those inside the building – including Pence – to evacuate.
The new audio was released after a federal appeals court gave Trump lawyers until November 30 to argue that White House documents from January 6 should not be handed to the Democrat-led committee investigating the riot.
His former chief of staff Mark Meadows has also been threatened with contempt of court charges if he doesn’t respond to request to testify before the panel by 10am on Friday.
Pictured: Vice President Mike Pence and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi preside over a Joint session of Congress to certify the 2020 Electoral College results after supporters of President Donald Trump stormed the Capitol earlier in the day on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on January 6, 2021 (file photo)
Pictured: A noose is seen having been put up by supporters of then-President Donald Trump outside the US Capitol building on January 6, as other stormed the building following a rally held by Trump calling for the 2020 election results to be overturned. It has been revealed that Trump defended calls to ‘hang’ his Vice President Mike Pence by his supporters at the riots
***
Read more at DailyMail.co.uk