Ben Roberts-Smith’s arch-nemesis Nick McKenzie gives him new two word nickname

The reporter who exposed Ben Roberts-Smith as a murderer has called him a liar and a bully after the Victoria Cross recipient lost his defamation case against Nine newspapers.

Nick McKenzie, who led Nine’s coverage of Mr Roberts-Smith’s war crimes, compared the 44-year-old to Lance Armstrong, the American cyclist who long denied serial doping. 

McKenzie addressed the media after Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko found on Thursday that Mr Roberts-Smith was involved in killing unarmed prisoners while serving with the SAS in Afghanistan.

‘Now’s the time for the nation and defence force to absorb what the judge has found,’ he said. ‘The full findings will be released in due course. 

‘What is clear is Ben Roberts-Smith is a liar. Someone described Ben Roberts-Smith to me as the Lance Armstrong of the Australian military.

‘And I think we must now take that as truth.’ 

Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko has found that Ben Roberts-Smith was involved in killing unarmed prisoners while serving with the SAS in Afghanistan

McKenzie said Thursday was ‘a day of justice’ for Mr Roberts-Smith’s former SAS comrades who came forward to give evidence against him. 

‘These brave men of the SAS stood up and told the truth,’ he said. 

‘They told the truth that Ben Roberts-Smith was a war criminal, a bully, and a liar. Australia should be proud of those men.’

McKenzie’s colleague Chris Masters – who co-wrote the stories about Mr Roberts-Smith – said the result was a relief but ‘I don’t people to think of this as a bad day for Australian soldiers’.

Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko delivered his findings in Sydney after a marathon trial which ran over 110 days and cost an estimated $25million. 

The judge dismissed Mr Roberts-Smith’s legal action after finding the newspapers had proven some of the war crimes allegations they made against him. 

Mr Roberts-Smith, who was not in court to hear the verdict, has been staying at a $500-a-night resort in Bali and was photographed lying poolside on Wednesday.

McKenzie said: ‘Ben Roberts-Smith brought this case. He came most every day but he did not come to the day of judgment. He’s in Bali doing whatever he’s doing.’

Nick McKenzie, the reporter who exposed Ben Roberts-Smith as a murderer, has called him a liar and a bully after the Victoria Cross recipient lost his defamation case against Nine newspapers. McKenzie (left) is pictured with colleague Chris Masters on Thursday

Nick McKenzie, the reporter who exposed Ben Roberts-Smith as a murderer, has called him a liar and a bully after the Victoria Cross recipient lost his defamation case against Nine newspapers. McKenzie (left) is pictured with colleague Chris Masters on Thursday

McKenzie issued a one-word statement on Twitter after the Ben Roberts-Smith decision

McKenzie issued a one-word statement on Twitter after the Ben Roberts-Smith decision

Justice Besanko found the publisher had proven the ‘substantial truth’ of the most serious claims against Mr Roberts-Smith in relation to two operations in which three unarmed Afghans were killed. 

The newspapers had conveyed 13 of the 14 imputations Mr Roberts-Smith said were defamatory but their defence, based largely on truth, was successful. 

While he did not accept the newspapers had established every murder allegation, they had shown enough such killings had taken place to dismiss the lawsuit. 

Judge Besanko also found the publisher had not proven Mr Roberts-Smith assaulted his mistress but could nonetheless rely on a defence of ‘contextual truth’.

Because he had accepted the other war crimes allegations, Justice Besanko said Mr Roberts-Smith’s reputation was not further harmed by the domestic violence claims. 

Justice Besanko found that on the balance of probabilities Mr Roberts-Smith kicked a prisoner off a cliff at Darwan and ordered another soldier to shoot the injured man dead.

He accepted Mr Roberts-Smith murdered a one-legged insurgent at a compound called Whiskey 108 during another mission on which he also ordered an elderly Afghan found hiding in a tunnel to be executed.

Roberts-Smith is pictured with another soldier drinking from the prosthetic leg souvenired from an Afghan shot dead at a Taliban compound dubbed Whiskey 108

Roberts-Smith is pictured with another soldier drinking from the prosthetic leg souvenired from an Afghan shot dead at a Taliban compound dubbed Whiskey 108

Justice Besanko’s rulings bring to an end the longest and most expensive defamation trial in Australian history. 

Mr Roberts-Smith launched a defamation action against three Nine Entertainment Company newspapers after he was branded a murderer, bully and perpetrator of domestic violence.

Mr Roberts-Smith claimed The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and Canberra Times made 14 defamatory imputationsclaims including that he was responsible for six unlawful killings in Afghanistan between 2009 and late 2012. 

He was also accused of bullying other soldiers in the Special Air Service Regiment and of assaulting a mistress in 2018 at a Canberra hotel. 

Named in the action were reporters Nick McKenzie, Chris Masters from the Herald and Age and David Wroe from the Canberra Times.  

The claims against Mr Roberts-Smith were made in a series of articles published in 2018 and initially identified him only by the pseudonym Leonidas, the famed Spartan king.

When Mr Roberts-Smith sued, Nine stood its ground and alleged he had murdered or was complicit in the murder of six Afghan prisoners. During the court case the publisher accepted it could not prove one of the alleged murders.

Australia's most decorated soldier has waited more than five years to learn whether he would ultimately be remembered as a battlefield hero or a woman-bashing war criminal

Australia’s most decorated soldier has waited more than five years to learn whether he would ultimately be remembered as a battlefield hero or a woman-bashing war criminal

Ben Roberts-Smith relaxes by the pool at a resort in Bali on Wednesday. The decorated soldier finally learnt the outcome of his defamation action against Nine newspapers on Thursday

Ben Roberts-Smith relaxes by the pool at a resort in Bali on Wednesday. The decorated soldier finally learnt the outcome of his defamation action against Nine newspapers on Thursday

Nine called witnesses who said Mr Roberts-Smith was an arrogant, bullying elitist with a warped warrior mentality that made him overstep the bounds of the laws of armed conflict.

Mr Roberts-Smith denied every allegation against him, maintaining he had only ever acted with honour and in the best traditions of the Australian Army. 

Mr Roberts-Smiths’ legal team was led by Bruce McClintock SC with Arthur Moses SC. The publishers were represented by Nicholas Owens SC.   

The trial commenced in June 2021 and was meant to last about 10 weeks but was beset by delays due to Covid-19, in particular border closures. Final submissions were heard in July last year.

In his closing address, Mr Moses had said Nine had no proof to support its allegations and no basis upon which to accuse his client of being a war criminal.

‘[Nine] published allegations and stories as fact that condemned Mr Roberts-Smith as being guilty of the most heinous acts of criminality that could be made against a member of the Australian Defence Force, and indeed any citizen,’ he said.

‘It depends upon recollections of evens that occurred during missions more than ten years ago…

‘Recollections which are contradicted either by their own witnesses, our witnesses and Defence Force documents’.

Nine newspapers’ statement on the Ben Roberts-Smith judgment

Nine’s managing director of publishing James Chessell and executive editor of The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, Tory Maguire, issued the following statement:  

‘We welcome the Federal Court’s judgement that investigations by The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald were correct in their reporting that Ben Roberts-Smith committed war crimes.

‘The finding by Justice Anthony Besanko today that Roberts-Smith participated in the execution of Afghans confirms our reports that the Victoria Cross recipient breached the Geneva Convention, and is a critical step towards justice for the families of the murder victims.

‘The judgement is a vindication for journalists Nick McKenzie and Chris Masters, who began reporting this difficult and complicated story more than seven years ago.

‘It is a vindication for the many people in our newsrooms and our organisation who supported this important public interest journalism. And, most importantly, it’s a vindication for the brave soldiers of the Australian Defence Force’s SAS who served their country with distinction and then had the courage to speak the truth about what happened in Afghanistan. 

‘Nick McKenzie and Chris Masters painstakingly pieced together these investigations, and today’s judgement exemplifies how the exhaustive public interest journalism of The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald serves our community.

‘The series of stories at the centre of this trial will have a lasting impact on the Australian Defence Force and how our soldiers conduct themselves during conflict.

‘Today is obviously a pivotal moment in this story and we are very pleased with the result – but it’s critical to acknowledge that it goes on beyond this judgement. We will continue to hold people involved in war crimes to account.

‘The responsibility for these atrocities does not stop with Ben Roberts-Smith.

‘Publishing a story of this magnitude is never easy, but high quality investigative journalism is vital to a thriving democracy.

‘Nine’s unequivocal backing of this reporting and our defence of it is a clear demonstration of its commitment to quality journalism.’ 

Among those to give evidence for both sides were former and serving SAS members who appeared under pseudonyms and gave conflicting versions of events in Afghanistan.

Mr Roberts-Smith’s ex-wife, Emma Roberts, testified against him, as did ‘Person 17’, the woman who claimed he assaulted her in a Canberra hotel while they were having an affair.

Among Ms Roberts’ claims was that her former husband had hidden files on a USB stick he buried in a child’s lunchbox in the backyard of their marital home.

In the background was the reputation of the Australian Defence Force, particularly its Special Forces operators, and the threat of criminal charges against Afghanistan veterans. 

A four-year inquiry by the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence resulted in damning report published n November 2020.

Justice Paul Brereton evidence of 39 unlawful killings of civilians or prisoners by 25 Australian Special Forces soldiers serving in Afghanistan from 2009 to 2016.

Two engagements in Afghanistan attracted the most attention during the Roberts-Smith trial. There was the storming of the Whiskey 108 compound at Kakarak in April 2009 and the killing of a prisoner at Darwan in September 2012.

Nine alleged Mr Roberts-Smith murdered an Afghan prisoner with a prosthetic leg during the battle at Kakarak. He said he lawfully shot dead an armed insurgent.

Ben Roberts-Smith is pictured with partner Sarah Matulin at an Anzac Day dawn service

Ben Roberts-Smith is pictured with partner Sarah Matulin at an Anzac Day dawn service

Mr Roberts-Smith also denied ordering a junior SAS member to kill a second Afghan in a ‘blooding’ custom during the same operation. Instead, he said an SAS trooper shot an insurgent armed with a machinegun.

It was not disputed that another soldier took the dead Afghan’s leg back to the SAS base at Tarin Kowt where it was used as a drinking vessel. 

The operation at Darwan began with a search for an Afghan soldier called Hekmatullah who had shot dead three Australians at their base 13 days earlier. 

Nine alleged Mr Roberts-Smith, a 202cm tall corporal, kicked a hand-cuffed villager, Ali Jan, off a cliff and ordered he be shot before his body was dragged into a cornfield.

Mr Roberts-Smith testified that Ali Jan was not innocent, but rather a ‘spotter’, or forward scout for the Taliban, and was carrying a radio. He said there was no cliff, no kick, and another SAS member lawfully killed him.

Nine alleged Mr Roberts-Smith also shot a young Afghan prisoner with a pistol after he was captured at Fasil in November 2012 and described the killing as ‘the most beautiful thing I’ve ever seen’. 

Mr Roberts-Smith is pictured with then wife Emma at a 2012 reception for military and civilian heroes in London

Mr Roberts-Smith is pictured with then wife Emma at a 2012 reception for military and civilian heroes in London  

The publisher further alleged Mr Roberts-Smith ordered an Afghan soldier to execute another prisoner in October the same year. Justice Besanko found Nine had not  established a truth defence to the allegations over those two deaths.

Nine accepted it could not prove Mr Roberts-Smith directed a comrade to kill a prisoner in a separate 2012 incident. 

Between the Kakarak and Darwan engagements, Mr Roberts-Smith’s actions in a battle at Tizak in June 2010 earned him the Victoria Cross. 

Mr McClintock said that award had led to ‘corrosive jealousy’ among some of Mr Roberts-Smith’s comrades and led to them telling lies about his battlefield conduct. 

‘This is a case about courage, devotion to duty, self-sacrifice and perhaps most important of all, surpassing skill in soldiering,’ Mr McClintock said at the start of the trial. 

‘On the other hand, Your Honour, it’s a case about dishonest journalism, corrosive jealousy, cowardice and lies. 

Mr Roberts-Smith's ex-wife, Emma Roberts, arrives at court to testify against her former husband in his marathon defamation trial

Mr Roberts-Smith’s ex-wife, Emma Roberts, arrives at court to testify against her former husband in his marathon defamation trial

‘It’s also about how a man with a deservedly high reputation for courage, skill and decency… had that reputation destroyed by bitter people jealous of his courage and success as a solider, particularly his Victoria Cross, aided by credulous journalists.’ 

Mr Roberts-Smith said being awarded the Victoria Cross had been an honour but was also a cross he had to bear for the rest of his life. 

‘Because for all of the good that is has brought me and has enabled me to do… it has also brought me a lot of misfortune and pain,’ he told the court.

‘As soon as you become a tall poppy that gives people the opportunity to belittle you and drag you down and undermine you, and use that award against you out of pure spite.’

While Mr Roberts-Smith denied each and every one of the war crime allegations levelled against him, he seemed even more perturbed by the claims of domestic violence.  

Person 17, with whom he had an affair outside his marriage to wife Emma, gave evidence Mr Roberts-Smith had assaulted her in March 2018 after a reception at Parliament House. 

She had been drunk at the event and fallen down a flight of stairs before returning to a hotel room where she claimed Mr Roberts-Smith punched the left side of her face – the same spot she was injured in the fall. 

Mr Roberts-Smith is pictured meeting Queen Elizabeth II at Buckingham Palace shortly after he was awarded the Victoria Cross in 2011

Mr Roberts-Smith is pictured meeting Queen Elizabeth II at Buckingham Palace shortly after he was awarded the Victoria Cross in 2011

Mr Roberts-Smith denied hitting Person 17, saying: ‘I’ve never hit a woman. I never would hit a woman’.

When asked by Mr McClintock how he thought he was viewed by the public, Mr Roberts-Smith referred the ‘deplorable’ claim, rather than the allegations of war crimes. 

‘Now I walk down the street, people will look at me,’ he said. ‘The first thing I think of is that they think I hit a woman.’

Mr Roberts-Smith stood down as general manager of Network Seven in Queensland before the trial commenced.

Seven West Media’s owner, Western Australian billionaire Kerry Stokes, extended a multimillion-dollar line of credit to his high-profile employee to run the action.

Mr Roberts-Smith provided his Victoria Cross and other battlefield decorations including his Medal for Gallantry as security for the loan.

Mr Stokes has said in the event Mr Roberts-Smith could not repay the money he would donate the medal group to the Australian War Memorial. 

BEN ROBERTS-SMITH TIMELINE

Ben Roberts-Smith was involved in killing unarmed prisoners while serving with the elite Special Air Service in Afghanistan, a judge has accepted

Ben Roberts-Smith was involved in killing unarmed prisoners while serving with the elite Special Air Service in Afghanistan, a judge has accepted

2006:  SAS Corporal Ben Roberts-Smith is deployed to Afghanistan for the first of six tours, which will see him return in 2007, 2009, 2010 and 2012.

Easter Sunday, 2009:  Ben Roberts-Smith shoots a man with a prosthetic leg at the Taliban base dubbed Whiskey 108. The leg is ‘souvenired’ back to the Australian soldiers’ base, where it is used as a drinking vessel in the unofficial bar, the Fat Ladies’ Arms. Fairfax will later claim this man was an innocent villager and that Roberts-Smith also directed a ‘rookie’ soldier to kill a second man at Whiskey 108 as a form of ‘blooding’ or initiation.

11 June 2010: On an operation hunting for a senior Taliban commander in Tizak, in Afghanistan’s Kandahar province, Roberts-Smith leads an assault against an enemy fortification and engages an insurgent, exposing his own position to draw fire away from members of his patrol who were pinned down. With total disregard for his own safety, he storms the enemy position, killing the two remaining machine gunners, allowing the assault team to gain the initiative. 

23 January, 2011: Australian Governor-General Quentin Bryce presents Roberts-Smith his Victoria Cross medal for the Tizak operation in Perth. 

11 September, 2012: In a southern Afghanistan village called Darwan, Roberts-Smith and other SAS soldiers look for an Afghan government soldier called Hekmatullah who had killed three Australian soldiers at an army base 13 days earlier. It would later be alleged by Nine newspapers that Roberts-Smith was the Australian soldier who kicked a man, Ali Jan, off a small cliff in Darwan and ordered an Afghan soldier to kill him.

2013: Roberts-Smith leaves the Australian Army. He is named Australian Father of the Year, begins studying for an MBA, and will join the Seven network as managing director, Queensland.

26 January 2014: Roberts-Smith is awarded the Commendation for Distinguished Service as part of the Australia Day honours, and is appointed chair of the Australia Day Council.

2016: The Department of Defence commissions the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force (IGADF) Afghanistan Inquiry, known as the Brereton Report,  into allegations about possible breaches of the Law of Armed Conflict by members of the Special Operations Task Group in Afghanistan from 2005 to 2016.  

June – August, 2018: Journalists Nick McKenzie, Chris Masters and David Wroe publish articles about a ‘warrior’ soldier they call Leonidas, and later identify as Ben Roberts-Smith. They claim he unlawfully killed innocent people in Afghanistan, including that he ‘murdered an unarmed and defenceless Afghan civilian’, that he bullied other soldiers, and that he punched a woman he was engaged in an extra-marital affair with in the face in 2018.

August, 2018: Roberts-Smith files defamation proceedings against Fairfax Media in the Federal Court. The 129-page lawsuit seeking aggravated damages, interest and costs claims he ‘has been greatly injured and his business, personal and professional reputation has been and will be brought into public disrepute, odium, ridicule and contempt’ by articles containing ‘false statements concerning his war service and personal life’.

October, 2018: Fairfax Media/Nine Newspapers files a truth defence, alleging Roberts-Smith was involved in six unlawful killings in Afghanistan, contravening the Geneva Convention, as well as bullying two colleagues and assaulting the unnamed woman with whom he was having an affair. 

June, 2021: After Nine drops one of its claims of an alleged ‘execution of an unarmed Afghan’ two weeks beforehand, the Federal Court defamation trial begins before Justice Anthony Besanko in Sydney. Roberts-Smith, 42, who says five killings happened lawfully in battle, is the first witness. 

June, 2022: After Covid delays, and 41 witnesses including Roberts-Smith’s former SAS comrades, his ex-wife Emma Roberts and his former mistress, the marathon 110-day trial costing $25 million comes to an end.

1 June, 2023: Justice Besanko delivers his findings. 

***
Read more at DailyMail.co.uk