Andrea Constand’s allegations that Bill Cosby drugged and sexually assaulted her are the product of a ‘pathological liar’, motivated by a desire for money and publicity, the disgraced comedian’s defense team argued in closing arguments on Tuesday.
The jury heard closing statements in the disgraced actor’s retrial at Montgomery County Courthouse in Norristown, Pennsylvania, on the 12th day of the hearing.
Cosby stands accused on three counts of aggravated indecent assault – penetration without consent, penetration while the complainant is unconscious and penetration without the knowledge of a complainant having administered an intoxicant for the purposes of preventing resistance.
A once-beloved figure known as ‘America’s Dad’ for playing Dr. Heathcliff Huxtable on The Cosby Show from 1984 to 1992, Cosby has denied wrongdoing, saying any sexual contact he has had was consensual.
If convicted of all three counts, he would likely face at most ten years in prison as a first offender under state sentencing guidelines, although Pennsylvania law allows for a maximum penalty of three consecutive ten-year sentences, a prosecution spokeswoman said.
Camille, Cosby’s wife of more than five decades, smiled as she and her disgraced comedian husband walked in to the courthouse together ahead of closing arguments.
Bill Cosby and his wife Camille smiled as they walked into Montgomery County Courthouse in Norristown, Pennsylvania, on Tuesday
Camille has not been in court for the duration of the trial, just as she was not present to hear evidence when Andrea Constand’s case against Cosby was first heard last June

Camille and her disgraced comedian husband have been married for more than five decades
The defense spoke first on Tuesday to urge the jury to ‘stand up against rumor, gossip and shallow nonsense.’
‘This is an 80-year-old man, who’s nearly blind, with a successful career who’s looking at absolute ruin,’ according to lead counsel Thomas Mesereau.
He said that Constand’s payout of $3.4 million in the civil suit against Cosby she settled in 2006 was ‘One of the biggest highway robberies of all time.’
‘Bill Cosby got conned big time,’ he said. ‘She didn’t require of him that he admit he did anything wrong. She just wanted the money.’
Mesereau said that Cosby paid for peace, but instead got a ‘disaster’, adding: ‘Eighty years old – on trial for your life that’s what he got.’
‘Credibility is everything’ he told the jury. ‘And when the accuser lies about anything in a case like this it’s over.’
What the prosecution termed ‘inconsistencies’ in her statement he branded lies, ‘She dead bang lied,’ Mesereau said. ‘You need pliers to pull the truth out of this person.’
Mesereau pulled up a list of what he said were 12 lies – flashing them up on the projection screen then working his way through each one.
He reeled off the list, ‘She lied about getting in bed with Bill Cosby in Connecticut. She lied about prior sexual contact. She lied about the reason for her trip to Connecticut.
‘She lied about being alone with Bill Cosby before the night of the alleged assault. She lied about flirting with Bill Cosby, the nature of her relationship with Bill Cosby, how long she knew him, about calling him after the night of the alleged assault.
‘She lied about wearing a sweater gifted to her by Bill Cosby. Miss Bliss clued me in on this one,’ he admitted, ‘She told me ask any woman what wearing a sweater he gave her means.’
He continued: ‘She lied about blaming Bill Cosby for her resignation from Temple, lied about roommates on the road and she lied about wanting money.’

Cosby’s retrial is set to go to the jury on Tuesday, but not before closing arguments pitting the prosecution’s portrayal of a serial predator against the defense’s contention that he’s the victim of a ‘con artist’

Andrea Constand alleges that Cosby drugged and assaulted her in his home in the Philadelphia suburbs in 2004
Mesereau declared, ‘This woman will say whatever she wants to say. The truth means nothing.’
Cosby’s wife Camille, 74, was in court for the first time this trial to listen to hear closing arguments.
Smiling broadly and wearing sunglasses she had walked directly to the front of the room to where her husband sat, he had stood at her approach.
Their foreheads touched as he put his hand in the small of her back and she put her arm around his shoulder. They exchanged words, he smiled and kissed her twice on the lips, once on the cheek before she took her seat in at the front of the gallery.
This was a very different Camille than the stoic figure of last year’s trial. Then too she attended only the closing arguments, choosing to sit out ‘uncomfortable’ testimony of her husband’s ‘intimacies’ with other women.
But she was blank-faced and barely acknowledged her husband. Today, even though she had run the gauntlet of protesters branding her husband a rapist, she seemed somehow serene – impervious to their jeers.
Before Mesereau took the podium to meticulously unpick the detail of Constand’s inconsistent testimony, co-counsel Kathleen Bliss had provided the jury with an overview of all that had gone before.
Speaking softly and earnestly she said, ‘You are about to make the most important decision of your life. You are about to decide the fate of Mr Cosby’.
She said: ‘There is just no credible evidence, no objective evidence to support any notion that Mr Cosby sexually assaulted Mr Cosby, no forensic evidence to suggest that he drugged Andrea Constand.’
‘Acquit,’ she urged. ‘Acquit Mr Cosby.’
In one extraordinary moment as she slammed what she presented as the unquestioning acceptance of sexual assault allegations in the post #MeToo environment.
She said: ‘I could say Mr Steele sexually assaulted me last year. My word against his word, spare the details. Would you convict on that?’

The defense rested on Monday after the 80-year-old comedian said he wouldn’t testify, echoing his decision at his first trial, which ended in a hung jury last year

A once-beloved figure known as ‘America’s Dad’ for playing Dr. Heathcliff Huxtable on The Cosby Show from 1984 to 1992, Cosby has denied wrongdoing, saying any sexual contact he has had was consensual

If convicted of all three counts, he would likely face at most ten years in prison as a first offender under state sentencing guidelines, although Pennsylvania law allows for a maximum penalty of three consecutive ten-year sentences
She urged them to ‘test the evidence, weigh it,’ and to ‘never, ever let anyone shame you into a conviction.’
She reminded them about Margo Jackson – the defense’s ‘star’ witness and a woman who the prosecution first tried to ban from the stand and then tried to impeach, suggesting that her statement had been ‘created’ with Bliss’s help.
Mesereau dubbed Jackson ‘Andrea Constand’s worst nightmare. If Margo Jackson is believed we’re out of here. It’s over’
Jackson, an employee of Temple University told the jury that Constand once told her that she had been sexually assaulted by a celebrity only to recant and say that she could say she had been and bring a lawsuit. ‘Get the money essentially,’ she said.
‘Who are you going to believe? ‘ Bliss said. ‘Are you going to believe a mature dignified woman who takes the stand? Or someone who gives you inconsistent statements one after another after another?’
Pitting Jackson’s education and career against Constand she said. ‘A woman who’s briefly at Temple running a pyramid scheme? A woman who’s been at Temple three decades or Andrea Constand, a woman scamming for money?’
According to Bliss the case is ‘over’ with Jackson’s testimony.
She dismissed Montgomery County Detective James Reape as ‘a Monday morning Quarterback’, for telling the court that he set inconsistencies in Constand’s statements aside when re-investigating the case in 2015.
‘That should make you shudder to the bone,’ she told the jury.
She reminded the jury that the county had originally declined to prosecute in 2005.
As for Gianna Constand, Bliss said she was either ‘an angry mother or a co-conspirator’. But it was the latter image she pressed.
Mrs Constand testified that Cosby had apologized to her during a telephone call in which he admitted to being ‘a dirty old man’ and to having digitally penetrated Constand.

As Cosby walked into the court alongside Camille, his spokesman Andrew Wyatt, who he normally walked into court with throughout the trial, trailed closely behind

There was a police presence outside the Norristown, Pennsylvania, court as the comedian walked into court on Tuesday morning

Cosby held his cane in one hand as he and Camille walked into the courthouse on Tuesday morning
This was no admission to any assault, simply the guilt of an older married man, Bliss said: ‘Think about it. He’s 30 years older than she is and he’s got the mother yelling at him. Yes he feels bad. He’s married.’
Next Bliss turned to the ‘five accusers’ – the prosecutor’s ‘prior bad acts’ witnesses.
‘First of all,’ she said, ‘How unfair is that? Digging up stuff from three decades ago?’
With more than a nod to the #MeToo movement she said: ‘Questioning an accuser is not shaming a victim. Gut feelings are not rational decisions. Mob rule is not due process.’
The defense had sought to have the case thrown out on the grounds that Cosby would not get a fair trial in the heat of the #MeToo movement.
Bliss said: ‘Just as we have had horrible, horrible crimes we have had horrible, horrible periods of time where emotions and hatred and fear have overwhelmed us: witch-hunts, lynching’s, McCarthyism.’
One by one she picked apart each woman’s story – linking them all with the common motive of money and publicity.
‘We’re not talking about children or teenagers here,’ she said ‘We’re talking about women who liked to party and now come forward with claims of rape;’
Janice Dickinson came in for a particularly scathing attack, with Bliss saying: ‘She’s a failed starlet, an aged out model; she’s sold a lot of books in her time. Sex sells.
‘It sounds like she’s slept with every man on the planet She flies hours and hours to Bali to hook up with Mr Cosby. He wasn’t interested. So she goes to her room boozes it up and pops a couple of Quaaludes.’
She reminded them that Dickinson had had to take a paternity test to determine whether the father of one of her children was Sylvester Stallone or another man.
‘Rocky was only a contender,’ she scoffed. ‘Is Miss Dickinson really the moral beacon for any women’s movement?’

Cosby’s lawyers Tom Mesereau (right) and Kathleen Bliss (left), arrive for the closing arguments in the retrial on Tuesday morning
‘She said America’s dad mounted her in 1982. Mr Cosby’s show didn’t air until 1984,’ she added. ‘That’s not a little white lie.’
Bliss blasted talk of Quaaludes as ‘a red-herring’ and reminded the jury that Benadryl was the only medication at play and something Cosby himself admitted to taking.
A faint smile flickered across Cosby’s face as he listened intently first to Bliss then to Mesereau’s calmly powerful close.
Known for his forensic approach to cross-examination Mesereau applied the same steady scrutiny to Constand’s testimony.
He dissected telephone records to show that Constand called Cosby hundreds of times after the night of the alleged assault but not once on the night itself as she had claimed.
There is no record of any telephone call from Constand to Cosby’s home in the entire month of January yet she claimed the she called from the road to let him know she was near so he could open the gate.
But Mesereau went further than simply highlighting this absence. For the prosecution to be able to bring this case he told the jury they have to prove, beyond reasonable doubt that this assault happened on or after December 30, 2003 to fall within the window of the statute of limitations.
According to Mesereau there is ‘not a single day between December 30 and the end of January when the assault could have possible taken place. He ran through the records to prove it.’
‘You’re dealing with a pathological liar,’ he told the jury with the tone of one almost apologetic at asking them to accept such an uncomfortable truth.
It’s a ‘He said, She said’ type case Mesereau said with no forensics, ‘thanks to her.’
He added: ‘The Commonwealth cannot meet their burden of proof.’
‘As he looks at you today Mr Cosby is innocent, never had a criminal conviction in his life. You can’t find him guilty based on their suspicion of guilt,’ Mesereau told the jury.
Mesereau concluded: ‘If you value the truth at all you must acquit Mr Cosby.
‘He must walk out of her free. He’s an 80-year-old man. He’s made some mistakes for sure. But ladies and gentlemen he is no criminal.’