Boris Johnson was booed as he left a tense two-hour lunch with Jean-Claude Juncker in Luxembourg today.
Protesters jeered the British PM after the showdown talks with the EU commission president at a restaurant.
And Mr Juncker tried to increase the pressure by saying although the meal had been ‘friendly’ he had still not seen any ‘legally operational’ proposals from the UK.
However, Mr Johnson shot back that he would not ask for a delay to the October 31 Brexit deadline – whether there was a deal or not.
It was the first time the two politicians have met since Mr Johnson took over in Downing Street.
The talks are a pivotal moment in the Brexit process, with just 45 days left until the UK is due to leave.
No10 said the leaders agreed that talks ‘needed to intensify’ and Mr Johnson had made clear that they needed to do a ‘deal with the backstop removed’.
Jean-Claude Juncker (right) tried to increase the pressure by saying although the meal had been ‘friendly’ he had still not seen any ‘legally operational’ proposals from the UK
Mr Johnson and Mr Juncker were still deep in discussions as they finished their lunch today
Mr Johnson was booed as he left the restaurant after the lunch with Mr Juncker today
A crowd of protesters, including British ex-pats gave the PM a hostile reception after his crunch talks with Mr Juncker today
Earlier, Mr Juncker said he was ‘always optimistic’. ‘Europe never loses patience,’ he said, joking that he would ‘pick up the bill’ for the meal.
For his part, Mr Johnson insisted before the discussions that he was ‘passionate’ about getting a deal and hailed ‘signs of movement’.
But he said he would ‘get Brexit done’ by ensuring the UK leaves by October 31, whether or not an agreement is reached.
Over the weekend, Mr Johnson likened the UK to the ‘Incredible Hulk’ breaking free of the ‘manacles’ of EU membership.
But the government has ramped up efforts to get a settlement with Brussels after Remainer MPs moved to hem in the government by ruling out No Deal, and blocking an election.
Legislation passed by Parliament obliges the PM to seek an extension if an agreement is not struck by October 19 – the day after a make-or-break EU summit concludes.
However, allies of the premier have been claiming there is a loophole in the rebel law that could allow the government to ignore it.
Jean-Claude Juncker (left) and Boris Johnson (right) shook hands before going inside the restaurant in Luxembourg today, where they are due to consider the impasse over a lunch of snails, salmon and cheese
The two leaders posed for the cameras as Mr Juncker – a former PM of Luxembourg – welcomed Mr Johnson for lunch
The leaders are meeting at the Le Bouquet Garni restaurant in Luxembourg today – rather than at an EU commission or a UK venue
One of the place settings in the restaurant today ahead of the lunch discussions
Mr Johnson and Mr Juncker shook hands again for the cameras inside the restaurant today
In another frantic day of politics as Brexit tensions rise:
- Mr Johnson’s chances of getting a deal through Parliament if he can reach terms with the EU have been boosted after whips suggested they could whittle down a Tory rebellion to just eight ‘Spartan’ hardliners.
- Austrian foreign minister Alexander Schallenberg appeared to give Mr Johnson another chink of light by hinting that the EU would veto an extension if the UK cannot make up its mind.
- Remainers dismissed speculation that the PM could simply ignore a rebel law ruling out No Deal, saying unlike the Incredible Hulk that British government must obey the law.
- Lib Dem leader Jo Swinson faced a backlash after the party confirmed that it would revoke Article 50 without a second referendum if it wins power.
- Jacob Rees-Mogg ridiculed calls from a Lib Dem activist for him to be ‘burned at the stake’, joking that as Lord President of the Council he was entitled to ‘the privilege of being beheaded’.
Over a meal of snails, salmon and cheese, Mr Johnson is expected to tell the former Luxembourg prime minister that he will reject the offer of any further extension, even if it is just for a few days.
What happens next in the Brexit crisis?
Here is how the coming weeks could pan out:
Today: Boris Johson meets Jean-Claude Juncker for lunch in Luxembourg.
September 17: Supreme Court hears case on whether prorogation of Parliament was illegal.
September 21-25: Labour conference in Brighton
September 29-October 2: Tory conference takes place in Manchester, with Mr Johnson giving his first keynote speech as leader on the final day. This will be a crucial waypointer on how Brexit talks are going.
October 14: Unless it has already been recalled following the court battle, Parliament is due to return with the Queen’s Speech – the day before Mr Johnson had hoped to hold a snap election.
October 17-18: A crunch EU summit in Brussels, where Mr Johnson has vowed he will try to get a Brexit deal despite Remainers ‘wrecking’ his negotiating position.
October 19: If there is no Brexit deal by this date Remainer legislation obliges the PM to beg the EU for an extension to avoid No Deal.
October 21: Decisive votes on the Queen’s Speech, which could pave the way for a confidence vote.
October 31: The current deadline for the UK to leave the EU.
November/December: An election looks inevitable, but Labour is hinting it might push the date back towards Christmas to humiliate the PM.
A No10 source said: ‘He could not be clearer that he will not countenance any more delays, we will be leaving on October 31 – no ifs, no buts.
‘Any further extension would be a huge mistake. It is not just a question of the extra dither and delay – it is also the additional long months of rancour and division, and all at huge expense.
‘We must finally deliver on the 2016 referendum. This is why the PM will stress to Mr Juncker that, while he wants to secure a deal, if no deal can be agreed by October 18 his policy is to leave without a deal on October 31 – and reject any delay offered by the EU.’
Writing in the Telegraph today, Mr Johnson said the UK was working ‘flat out’ for a deal, despite the EU complaining that no formal proposals have been put forward yet.
‘I believe passionately that we can do it, and I believe that such an agreement is in the interests not just of the UK but also of our European friends,’ the PM wrote.
‘We have all spent too long on this question. And if we can get that deal, then of course there will be time for Parliament to scrutinise and approve it before the end of October.’
‘But be in no doubt that if we cannot get a deal – the right deal for both sides – then the UK will come out anyway.’
British officials have been drawing up alternatives to the Irish backstop, which is designed to prevent the return of a hard border.
Boost for PM as whips say they could squeeze Tory rebellion to just EIGHT MPs
Boris Johnson’s hopes of getting a Brexit deal through Parliament have been boosted after it emerged chips believe he can squeeze a Tory Eurosceptic rebellion to ‘single figures’.
Mr Johnson is now concentrating his efforts on striking a new Brexit deal with the EU after MPs passed a law to effectively take No Deal off the table.
But the PM knows he will need the support of as many of his Conservative MPs as possible if he is to have any chance of winning a crunch vote on a new agreement in the House of Commons.
Chief Whip Mark Spencer has reportedly told the PM that if he can secure ‘meaningful changes’ to the Irish border backstop protocol he can get the rebellion down to ‘between eight and ten’ hardline Brexiteers.
Downing Street has made clear that any Tory MP who votes against a deal put before the Commons by Mr Johnson will be stripped of the whip.
But the ‘Spartans’ – the name given to an uncompromising group of Tory Brexiteers – have warned the PM they will not be pressured into supporting a bad deal and have insisted they do not fear being expelled.
In fact, they said any attempt to kick them out of the party would result in the Tories losing the next election.
They argue the chances of an informal pact between the Tories and the Brexit Party – viewed as crucial to Conservative hopes of winning a majority – would be dead if Mr Johnson booted them out because Nigel Farage would almost certainly side with them.
The new blueprint could see Northern Ireland stay within some of the EU’s regulatory framework to avoid the need for checks.
However, the province would be within the UK’s customs jurisdiction.
The EU previously rejected such ideas when Theresa May was PM, and it is uncertain whether they would be acceptable to the DUP.
No10 has also insisted it will not table a written plan at this stage as the EU would merely ‘rip it up’.
Speaking at a meeting of foreign ministers in Brussels today, Mr Schallenberg said: ‘If Prime Minister Johnson doesn’t show up with new proposals when he meets Juncker, honestly for us, for the EU, there is no other option than a hard Brexit.
The British have to tell us what they need in order to convince the House of Commons.’
Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab suggested today that the government is hunting for loopholes in the rebel legislation against No Deal.
‘The UK government is always going to behave lawfully. I think the suggestion otherwise is nonsense, he said.
‘I think the precise implications of the legislation need to be looked at very carefully. We are doing that.’
Downing Street said the PM could both ensure the UK left the
European Union come what may on October 31 and comply with the law aimed
at preventing a no-deal Brexit – but refused to explain how.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: ‘The position of the PM is that we comply with the law but that we are leaving on October 31 whatever the outcome.’
Asked how those two things could be compatible, the spokesman said: ‘I’ve avoided getting into any of that beyond saying that governments comply by the law but we will be leaving on October 31.’
However, referring to the PM’s Incredible Hulk analogy, former Cabinet minister David Gauke told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: ‘Maybe the Incredible Hulk doesn’t have to comply with the law, but the British Government does.
‘And if Parliament has neither supported a deal, nor supported a no-deal departure, then the law is clear that he has to seek an extension, the Prime Minister has to seek an extension and that is what he will have to do. ‘That is what the law states.’
Before the meeting today, Mr Johnson posted a video on Twitter that was filmed on board his plane on Friday.
As the aircraft rose into the the air, Mr Johnson compared it to the UK taking off under his leadership.
He said he was ‘cautiously optimistic’ about reaching an agreement with Brussels, but added: ‘We are going to get it done. We are going to come out of the EU on October 31.’
He also again rejected anger about his decision to suspend Parliament until October 14 – which has been controversially ruled illegal by Scottish judges.
Pointing out that the Commons was only sitting for four days fewer than previously expected, Mr Johnson said there would be plenty of time for debate, adding: ‘They have had three years to talk about what to do about Brexit.’
In an interview with Sky’s Sophy Ridge on Sunday, Brexit Secretary Steve Barclay said: ‘There has been detailed technical talks led by David Frost, the Prime Minister’s Europe adviser. They have been meeting with Michel Barnier’s team.
‘The Prime Minister will be seeing President Juncker, I’ll be meeting with Michel Barnier, so there’s extensive talks been happening both at a technical level but also at a political level.
‘So there has been a huge amount of work going on behind the scenes. We can see a landing zone in terms of a future deal but there is significant work still to do.’
But she said the Government was not going to propose a similar deal to Mrs May’s.
Ahead of his meeting with Mr Juncker, Mr Johnson yesterday struck a confident tone, saying ‘we will get there’ and that a ‘huge amount of progress is being made’.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson (pictured left in Downing Street today and right in a ‘selfie’ video posted on Twitter) has said he believes ‘passionately’ that a new Brexit deal is possible before October 31
Maverick No10 Brexit chief Dominic Cummings (pictured in Westminster today) is looking for ways around the rebel legislation against No Deal
Speaking to the Mail on Sunday, Mr Johnson said: ‘I will be talking to Jean-Claude about how we’re going to do it. I’m very confident.
‘When I got this job everybody was saying there can be absolutely no change to the withdrawal agreement, the backstop was immutable, the arrangements by which the UK was kept locked in to the EU forever, they said no one could change that.
‘They have already moved off that and, as you know, there’s a very, very good conversation going on about how to address the issues of the Northern Irish border. A huge amount of progress is being made.’
However, Mr Juncker yesterday said he was still waiting to receive detailed proposals from London as to how the withdrawal agreement should be changed.
He told German radio station Deutschlandfunk: ‘We do not know what the British want in detail, precisely and accurately, and we are still waiting for alternative proposals. Time is running out.’
Writing in today’s Telegraph, Mr Johnson accuses the opposition parties of being part of a ‘Remainer attempt to crush Brexit’ while claiming only to want to thwart No Deal.
He points the finger at Jeremy Corbyn, saying the Labour leader wants to keep Britain tied to the EU ‘at a cost of £250million a week’ – significantly less than the £350million calculation the Leave side used during the referendum campaign of 2016.
The Prime Minister adds: ‘That’s enough to build a new hospital.’
What is the Irish backstop and why is it so divisive?
The so-called Irish border backstop is one of the most controversial parts of the existing Brexit deal. This is what it means:
What is the backstop?
The backstop was invented to meet promises to keep open the border between Ireland and Northern Ireland even if there is no comprehensive UK-EU trade deal.
The divorce deal says it will kick in automatically at the end of the Brexit transition period if that agreement is not in place.
It effectively keeps the UK in a customs union with the EU, and Northern Ireland in both the customs union and single market.
This means many EU laws will keep being imposed on the UK, restricting its ability to do its own trade deals. It also means regulatory checks on some goods crossing the Irish Sea.
Why have Ireland and the EU demanded it?
Because the UK is leaving the customs union and single market, the EU said it needed guarantees that people and goods circulating inside its border – in this case in Ireland – met its rules.
This is covered by the Brexit transition, which effectively maintains the status quo, and can in theory be done in the comprehensive EU-UK trade deal.
But the EU said there had to be a backstop to cover what happens in any gap between the transition and final deal.
Why do critics hate it?
Because Britain cannot decide when to leave the backstop.
Getting out – even if there is a trade deal – can only happen if both sides agree and Brexiteers fear the EU will unreasonably demand the backstop continues so EU law continues to apply in Northern Ireland.
Northern Ireland MPs also hate the regulatory border in the Irish Sea, insisting it unreasonably carves up the United Kingdom.
What are the UK’s new proposals?
The latest blueprint being floated would not be the same as a previous Northern Ireland-only backstop floated by Brussels, which was dismissed by Theresa May as something no British PM could accept.
That would have involved the province staying within the EU’s tax jurisdiction.
Instead, the idea is thought to be a much looser alignment of agricultural and food regulations with Ireland.
That could help avoid many checks on the border, but it is far from clear it would be acceptable either to the EU or the DUP.