Constituency boundary switch would’ve delivered a May win

Theresa May would have won a majority at the general election under fair constituency boundaries, a review has suggested.

Plans by the Boundary Commission to redraw borders and equalise the number of voters in each seat would – if they had been in force in June – have given the Tories the handful of extra MPs they needed.

The plans would also see the total number of MPs cut from 650 to 600.

Under the proposals, Jeremy Corbyn, Boris Johnson and David Davis would face a fight to stay in the Commons.

Theresa May would have won a majority at the general election under fair constituency boundaries, according to a review 

Under the proposals, Jeremy Corbyn (pictured), Boris Johnson and David Davis would face a fight to stay in the Commons

Under the proposals, Jeremy Corbyn (pictured), Boris Johnson and David Davis would face a fight to stay in the Commons

The Labour leader’s Islington North seat would be merged with his neighbour Diane Abbott’s, while Mr Johnson’s Uxbridge and South Ruislip seat would become a tight marginal, experts said. 

Mr Davis’s Haltemprice and Howden seat would be merged with a neighbouring constituency, leaving the Brexit Secretary fighting for a place in Parliament.

Originally drawn up under the coalition government, the Boundary Commission’s proposals were vetoed by then Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg, who reneged on a deal to support them. David Cameron failed to pass them before he left office in the aftermath of the Brexit referendum, and Mrs May called this year’s election before they could be put on the statute book.

One analysis of the proposals based on June’s election suggests they would have left the Conservatives with between 307 and 309 seats in a Commons of 600, down from 316 now. Labour would be reduced from 262 to around 240.

Currently the Conservatives lose out as a result of where constituency boundaries lie. Their seats tend to contain more voters, meaning the number of MPs they have is lower than if they were of a more equal size.

The Government is still committed to passing the plans, but ministers privately say there is next to no chance of them being in place for the next election. Northern Ireland’s DUP, whose MPs give Mrs May a slim majority, are opposed to them and Tory MPs who face losing their seats are unlikely to vote in favour of the changes.

Boris Johnson's Uxbridge and South Ruislip seat would become a tight marginal, experts said

Boris Johnson’s Uxbridge and South Ruislip seat would become a tight marginal, experts said

Mr Davis's Haltemprice and Howden seat would be merged with a neighbouring constituency, leaving the Brexit Secretary fighting for a place in Parliament

Mr Davis’s Haltemprice and Howden seat would be merged with a neighbouring constituency, leaving the Brexit Secretary fighting for a place in Parliament

Last week Conservative Party chairman Patrick McLoughlin and chief whip Gavin Williamson wrote to MPs to reassure them that none would be ‘left behind’ as a result.

Constitution minister Chris Skidmore added: ‘A boundary review is needed to ensure fair and equal representation for the voting public across the United Kingdom by the next general election. Without any boundary reforms, constituencies would be based on data that is over 20 years old.

‘This would disregard significant changes in demographics, house building and migration.’

The number of MPs in the Commons would be cut from 533 to 501 in England, 59 to 53 in Scotland, 40 to 29 in Wales and 18 to 17 in Northern Ireland.

  • Labour is gaining support in cities, while the Tories have more backing in towns, according to a study by the New Economics Foundation.

At the general election in June, the swing to Labour from the Tories was more than twice as big in English cities, at 10.2 per cent, as it was in smaller towns, of 4.1 per cent, according to the survey. 

Why they must change 

There is one simple reason why constituency boundaries must change, Tories argue: fairness.

There are huge variations in the number of voters in different seats.

At one end is the Isle of Wight, whose Tory MP Bob Seely represents 105,000 voters; at the other extreme, Wirral West, represented by Labour’s Margaret Greenwood, has just 54,000 electors.

But all seats get one MP, meaning votes in some parts of the country count more than others.

There is also the matter of political advantage. Under the existing system the Tories lose out. With existing boundaries, their seats tend to have more voters, meaning they get fewer seats per vote cast.

As a result, the Boundary Commission was asked to redraw the constituency map to equalise the numbers.

If the proposals published yesterday are implemented, no seat will be bigger than 78,507 or smaller than 71,031.

The Government also wants to reduce the number of seats from 650 to 600. This could lead to rows between constituency neighbours over who gets the new seat.

 

Read more at DailyMail.co.uk