House Democrats on Friday formally requested that the Justice Department investigate Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt for potential criminal conduct.
Pruitt is already the subject of more than a dozen separate probes into his conduct, run by the EPA’s Office of Inspector General, the Government Accountability Office and congressional oversight committees. But none carries the weight of a criminal corruption investigation.
President Donald Trump has been quick to brush off attacks on his EPA chief as partisan griping directed at an effective leader, even as the list of his alleged transgressions grows.
‘Scott Pruitt is doing a great job within the walls of the EPA. We’re setting records,’ Trump told DailyMail.com on Friday as he left the White House for the G7 summit in Canada.
‘Outside he’s being attacked very viciously by the press. I’m not saying that he’s blameless, but we’ll see what happens,’ the president added.
President Donald Trump said Friday that EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt is doing a great job but isn’t necessarily ‘blameless’ as a parade of scandals pile up
Pruitt is facing at least a dozen separate investigations inside the federal government but now House Democrats are asking the Justice Department to investigate him with an eye toward filing criminal corruption charges
Maryland Democratic Rep. Don Beyer (left) and Virginia Democratic Rep. Gerry Connolly (right) are organizing a group of six lawmakers to demand a new probe from the DOJ
In a letter to FBI Director Chris Wray and Justice criminal division chief John Cronan, six Democratic lawmakers with oversight of Pruitt’s agency allege he repeatedly violated federal anti-corruption laws by seeking to leverage his government position for personal gain.
As evidence, the Democrats cite Pruitt’s $50-a-night lease of a Capitol Hill condo tied to a lobbyist seeking to influence his agency, directing an EPA aide to contact a senior Chick-fil-A executive as part of an effort to land his family a franchise, and a $2,000 payment to his wife from organizers of a conference the administrator then attended at taxpayer expense.
Justice Department spokesman Wyn Hornbuckle confirmed officials there were aware of the request to investigate Pruitt. He declined further comment.
EPA spokesman Jahan Wilcox referred questions to Pruitt’s outside legal counsel, though he did not respond to requests to provide the name of the administrator’s defense lawyer.
Pruitt acknowledged last month that friends and supporters had established a legal defense fund, which Democrats and ethics watchdogs quickly derided as a potential ‘tip jar’ for polluters seeking favorable treatment from his agency.
Pruitt, whose agency is near the White House, had to be told recently not to use the famous Navy Mess as his personal dining room
Friday’s letter was signed by Democratic Reps. Gerald Connolly and Donald Beyer of Virginia, Jamie Raskin of Maryland, Ruben Gallego of Arizona, Pramila Jayapal of Washington and Ted Lieu of California. Connolly is a senior member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and serves as the ranking Democrat on the Subcommittee on Government Operations.
Pruitt sought to laugh off the controversy this week over his using government resources to seek a ‘business opportunity’ with the fast-food fried chicken chain whose owners are known for supporting conservative Christian causes, including outspoken opposition to same-sex marriage.
‘I mean, look, my wife is an entrepreneur herself. I love, she loves, we love Chick-fil-A as a franchise of faith,’ Pruitt said in a TV interview on Wednesday.
Pruitt last year directed his EPA scheduler to reach out to a top executive at Chick-fil-A to inquire about a ‘business opportunity.’ That business opportunity turned out to be Pruitt’s desire to acquire a fast-food franchise for his wife.
Activists opposed to Pruitt have been appealing to Capitol Hill workers emerging from the subway in Washington, mocking the controversial Trump Cabinet member for allegedly trying to get a Chick-fil-A franchise for his wife
Federal ethics codes prohibit having staffers conduct personal errands and bar officials from using their position for private gain.
EPA travel vouchers also show Pruitt charged taxpayers last September for a $1,210 one-way flight and $669 in hotel costs to appear at a conference of a New York City-based nonprofit, Concordia.
At Pruitt’s overture, the group hired his wife, Marlyn Pruitt, to help arrange logistics for the conference, Concordia chief executive Matthew Swift told The Washington Post. She was paid $2,000 plus travel expenses. Concordia did not return emails from the AP seeking comment, and the group’s website lists a non-working phone number.
Democratic senators this week accused Pruitt of withholding records of the trip, where Pruitt also met with U.S. and international business leaders and former government officials. The senators asked EPA Inspector General Arthur Elkins Jr. to investigate the agency’s compliance with open-records laws in the matter.
Pruitt staffer Millan Hupp (right) was tasked with helping him purchase a used luxury mattress, among other unusual duties; she resigned this week
Virginia Canter, an ethics counsel for the liberal watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said there were a ‘number of criminal conflict of interest statutes and regulations’ that could be brought into play by Pruitt speaking at events that he or his family had received payment for.
In their letter, the lawmakers make the case that Pruitt’s behavior rises to the level of criminal activity.
‘At the very least, we know that federal ethics laws bar public officials from using their position or staff for private gain,’ the Democrats wrote to Wray and Cronan. ‘Administrator Pruitt has certainly done just that.’
‘Further, his actions related to his wife’s employment and the quid-pro-quo condo situation with industry lobbyists may have crossed a line into criminal conduct punishable by fines or even by time in prison.’