Donald Trump plans to resume US funding for the WHO

Donald Trump ‘plans to resume US funding for the WHO at the same level as China’ after calling the group a mouthpiece for Beijing

  • Leaked draft letter suggests Trump will resume some US funding to the WHO
  • Letter offers to match the funding that China provides to the organization
  • US previously sent $400 million a year while China sends 10% of that 
  • Trump cut funding pending an investigation into WHO pandemic response
  • He has accused the group of being lackeys for China and bungling response 

President Donald Trump is planning to resume some funding to the controversial World Health Organization, according to a leaked draft of a White House letter.

Trump last month cut off all U.S. funding to the group, accounting for about half the WHO’s annual funding, accusing it of ‘severely mismanaging and covering up the spread of the coronavirus.’

The president has kept up the criticism, saying at a town hall last week: ‘The World Health organisation has been a disaster — everything they said was wrong, and they’re China-centric.’  

Now, the White House is apparently on the brink of offering to resume funding the WHO at the same level as China, according to a draft letter reported by Fox News host Tucker Carlson.  

President Donald Trump is planning to resume some funding to the controversial World Health Organization, according to a leaked draft of a White House letter

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is seen above. Questions linger about the relationship between China and the WHO

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is seen above. Questions linger about the relationship between China and the WHO

‘Despite [its] shortcomings, I believe that the WHO still has tremendous potential, and want to see the WHO live up to this potential, particularly now during this global crisis’ the draft letter reads, apparently in Trump’s voice.

‘That is why I’ve decided the United States will continue to partner and work with the World Health Organization’ it adds. ‘China owes a massive debt to the entire world, and it can start with paying its fair share to the WHO.’

‘If China increases its funding to the WHO,’ the letter adds, ‘we will consider matching those increases.’ 

Previously, the U.S. send about $400 million a year to the WHO every year, which is ten times the amount China contributes.

It comes as questions linger about the relationship between China and the WHO.

Earlier this week, it was reported that the CIA believes China bullied the WHO into delaying the declaration of a global health emergency in January, even as Beijing hoarded medical equipment.

World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (left) and Chinese leader Xi Jinping shake hands in Beijing on January 28, 2020

World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (left) and Chinese leader Xi Jinping shake hands in Beijing on January 28, 2020

A CIA report says China threatened to stop cooperating with the WHO’s coronavirus investigation if the organization declared the outbreak a global health emergency, according to Newsweek.

The alleged delay came at a crucial time in January, as the virus was spreading around the world undetected and China was stockpiling medical equipment and protective gear made in the U.S. and elsewhere.

It is the second Western intelligence report to indicate that China strong-armed the WHO into downplaying the risks of the epidemic, after a German intelligence document reported by Der Spiegel suggested that Chinese leader Xi Jinping personally pressured WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

In a statement to DailyMail.com, the WHO denied that it had bowed to any outside pressure in the early stages of the pandemic.

‘The WHO Constitution says that each Member State must ‘respect the exclusively international character of the Director-General and the staff and not to seek to influence them,’’ the statement said. 

‘We know that every country understands this obligation is critical to WHO’s impartiality and neutrality in its global health work.’

Read more at DailyMail.co.uk