Fellow influencers Martha Kalifatidis and Ruby Tuesday Matthews turn on Jadé Tuncdoruk

Jadé Tuncdoruk is under fire after a string of recent controversies. 

And on Monday, it was revealed that two fellow influencers –  Martha Kalifatidis and Ruby Tuesday Matthews – have turned on the Instagram superstar. 

Ruby, 27, shared an Instagram Stories post which appeared to refer to Jadé’s recent issues. 

Friends indeed: Jadé Tuncdoruk (pictured) is under fire after a string of recent controversies. And on Monday, it was revealed that two fellow influencers – Martha Kalifatidis and Ruby Tuesday Matthews – have turned on the Instagram superstar 

She wrote: ‘Sitting at home on a Friday sipping tea, watching the complete s**tstorm an influencer has created (yet again) having a little [giggle emoji]. 

‘Trust me I’ve had my fair share of f**k ups. But it’s called owning it. PS. Sometimes apologising/ making good helps’. 

Martha, 33, was less vocal, but she was among those who ‘liked’ an Instagram post from the account Celeb Spellcheck, which documented Jadé’s demands for a refund from her honeymoon venue. 

Comments: Ruby (pictured) shared an Instagram Stories post which appeared to refer to Jadé's recent issues

Comments: Ruby (pictured) shared an Instagram Stories post which appeared to refer to Jadé’s recent issues

Oh dear! 'Trust me I've had my fair share of f**k ups. But it's called owning it. PS. Sometimes apologising/making good helps,' she wrote

Oh dear! ‘Trust me I’ve had my fair share of f**k ups. But it’s called owning it. PS. Sometimes apologising/making good helps,’ she wrote

Martha and Jadé were previously friendly, having shared a warm greeting when they attended a Charlotte Tilbury event together in November. 

Jadé, 26, has been making headlines for all the wrong reasons this , after she demanded a small business refund her $2,000 honeymoon deposit – even though their clear-cut terms and conditions said this wasn’t possible. 

Tuncdoruk came under fire after slamming luxury holiday rental company Weekenda on Instagram last week for refusing to refund her $2,000 deposit. 

Liked: Martha (pictured) was less vocal, but she was among those who 'liked' an Instagram post from the account Celeb Spellcheck

Liked: Martha (pictured) was less vocal, but she was among those who ‘liked’ an Instagram post from the account Celeb Spellcheck

Weighing in: The post documented Jadé's demands for a refund from her honeymoon venue

Weighing in: The post documented Jadé’s demands for a refund from her honeymoon venue

In her now-deleted post, Tuncdoruk said she’d booked her honeymoon at Meerea Park Country Estate, in the Hunter Valley, in July 2021 and planned to stay there in March 2022. 

But she decided to cancel the trip a month later after postponing her wedding due to Covid. 

Weekenda’s terms and conditions clearly state that customers aren’t eligible for refunds if they cancel, but Tuncdoruk seemingly didn’t think this rule applied to her and demanded a refund on her deposit.

Pals: Martha and Jadé were previously friendly, having shared a warm greeting when they attended a Charlotte Tilbury event together in November (pictured )

Pals: Martha and Jadé were previously friendly, having shared a warm greeting when they attended a Charlotte Tilbury event together in November (pictured ) 

‘We requested a refund due to the pandemic, but they said the best they could do was put it back up online to be booked by someone else,’ she explained.

‘Six weeks out of [sic] the booking and we’ve asked again for a refund which they’ve denied. They’ve had months to refund us for a booking that we don’t need. They’re taking our money just because they can.’

She added: ‘It’s just incredibly poor form and so disappointing that businesses are taking advantage of people in the middle of a pandemic.’

Demands: Jadé has been making headlines for all the wrong reasons this week, after she demanded a small business refund her $2,000 honeymoon deposit - even though their clear-cut terms and conditions said this wasn't possible

Demands: Jadé has been making headlines for all the wrong reasons this week, after she demanded a small business refund her $2,000 honeymoon deposit – even though their clear-cut terms and conditions said this wasn’t possible

Luxury getaway: In her now-deleted post, Tuncdoruk said she'd booked her honeymoon at Meerea Park Country Estate, in the Hunter Valley, in July 2021 and planned to stay there in March 2022. Pictured: the property booked by Tuncdoruk

Luxury getaway: In her now-deleted post, Tuncdoruk said she’d booked her honeymoon at Meerea Park Country Estate, in the Hunter Valley, in July 2021 and planned to stay there in March 2022. Pictured: the property booked by Tuncdoruk

In black and white: Weekenda's terms and conditions (pictured) clearly state that customers aren't entitled to a refund of their deposit if they cancel

In black and white: Weekenda’s terms and conditions (pictured) clearly state that customers aren’t entitled to a refund of their deposit if they cancel 

Leaked e-mails obtained by Daily Mail Australia showed how Tuncdoruk threatened to take Weekenda to Fair Trading if they didn’t refund her deposit.  

Not long after, a smug-looking Tuncdoruk shared a photo of herself smiling after announcing that Weekenda had agreed to refund her deposit.

In her caption, she thanked her followers for rallying around her, saying: ‘They’ve agreed to refund us for our stay! Thank you guys for your help [love heart emoji].’ 

Smug: Leaked e-mails obtained by Daily Mail Australia showed how Tuncdoruk threatened to take Weekenda to Fair Trading if they didn't refund her deposit. Not long after, Tuncdoruk shared a photo of herself smiling after announcing that Weekenda had agreed to refund her

Smug: Leaked e-mails obtained by Daily Mail Australia showed how Tuncdoruk threatened to take Weekenda to Fair Trading if they didn’t refund her deposit. Not long after, Tuncdoruk shared a photo of herself smiling after announcing that Weekenda had agreed to refund her

Regrettable: On Friday, Tuncdoruk once again made headlines when she was forced to apologise for a racially insensitive Facebook post from 2017

Regrettable: On Friday, Tuncdoruk once again made headlines when she was forced to apologise for a racially insensitive Facebook post from 2017 

On Friday, Tuncdoruk once again made headlines when she was forced to apologise for a racially insensitive Facebook post from 2017.

In the resurfaced post, Tuncdoruk complained to Uber Eats about their ‘annoying non-English speaking delivery drivers’.

After expressing regret for her post, she turned her Instagram account to private.

Tuncdoruk makes a living spruiking products to her 484,000 followers and earns between $800 and $3,000 per sponsored post.

Popular: Tuncdoruk makes a living spruiking products to her 484,000 followers and earns between $800 and $3,000 per sponsored post

Popular: Tuncdoruk makes a living spruiking products to her 484,000 followers and earns between $800 and $3,000 per sponsored post

***
Read more at DailyMail.co.uk