Drunk problem gambler who lost $20,000 in a single six-hour sitting was so intoxicated he couldn’t even spell his own name during betting spree
- A problem gambler who was drunk and high on weight-loss pills lost $20,000
- The man, known only as MR D, lost all the money in six hours on December 13
- He lodged a complaint arguing he did not remember the six-hour streak
- The Northern Territory Racing Commission ruled against the complainant
A problem gambler who was drunk and high on weight loss pills lost $20,000 in six hours despite not being able to spell his own name correctly.
The man, known only as Mr D, later complained to the Northern Territory Racing Commission (NTRC) saying he did not remember the six-hour streak on December 13 last year.
Mr D arguing he should be refunded the full amount because he spelled his name wrong and was ‘chasing his losses’.
A problem gambler who was drunk and high on weight loss pills, lost $20,000 in six hours despite not being able to spell his own name correctly (horse racing pictured)
However the NTRC ruled the online bookmaker Neds.com.au did not breach their duty of care.
Neds.com.au told the Racing Commission the man had spelled his first name ‘close enough that we assumed they were one and the same person’ and ruled out the possibility he was a fraud.
Racing Commisson presiding member John Boneham said there was a ‘very high threshold of responsibility for the gambler as to their own actions’.
The man, known only as Mr D, later complained to the Northern Territory Racing Commission (pictured) saying he did not remember the six-hour streak on December 13 last year
The NTRC ruled the online bookmaker Neds.com.au (pictured) did not breach their duty of care
Mr Boneham said a bookmaker would only be ordered to refund a gambler if deliberate or gross conduct was found.
‘Only in the most extreme cases of deliberate and gross conduct by the operator who has knowledge of the vulnerability of the problem gambler that there would be any duty owned to prevent loss,’ Mr Boneham said.
‘It may well be that the appellant found it difficult, even impossible, to control his urge to continue gambling beyond the point of prudence. However, there was nothing which prevented him staying away from the club.’
The gambler (stock) said he was so drunk and high on weight-loss pills he did not remember the entire six-hour streak
Advertisement