Henry Dimbleby, the Government’s food tsar, said ministers need to do more to tackle food poverty
The Government’s own food tsar today told Boris Johnson he ‘isn’t doing enough’ to tackle food poverty amid a growing Tory revolt over the free school meals row.
Henry Dimbleby, the co-founder of the Leon restaurant chain and an adviser to the Government, said the issue of families not having enough to eat is ‘serious’ and is ‘going to get worse’ because of rising unemployment.
He said by the end of the year there will be large numbers of people who ‘are going to struggle to feed their family’ because of the impact of the coronavirus crisis as he warned the ‘Government really must act’.
Mr Dimbleby’s comments came as George Osborne, the ex-chancellor, also stuck the boot into Mr Johnson as he said Marcus Rashford had ‘nutmegged’ the PM and a U-turn on free school meals is now ‘inevitable’.
The ex-chancellor said the Manchester United and England footballer had made the Cabinet ‘look like a school yard football team’ and with Tory MPs now ‘getting nervy’ the PM will have no choice but to back down.
Earlier today a millionaire minister had claimed holiday activities are ‘more important’ to disadvantaged children than free meals.
Nadhim Zahawi, the business minister, said the ‘best way’ to deal with poverty was through local government schemes and the welfare system as he pointed to a pilot programme which provided food and activities to poor children during the summer holidays.
But the married father-of-three who made his money in oil and gas exploration risked outcry as he claimed parents ‘appreciate the food but more important than the food to them was the activities’.
The Government remains under intense pressure to change tack on free school meals as a campaign led by Mr Rashford continues to gather pace and a Tory revolt grows.
Campaigners want the scheme, which costs about £20million per week, to be extended to cover future school holidays. If it applied to all 13 weeks of school holidays it could therefore cost an estimated £260million extra a year.
Mr Johnson dug in on the issue yesterday as he refused to budge and Rishi Sunak did the same today as he said ‘I don’t think it’s always the right answer that central government comes in and dictates things’.
But the approach taken by Number 10 has sparked widespread Tory anger, with MPs adamant the Government should U-turn.
Conservative backbenchers also signalled today they could rebel over ‘unconscionable’ plans to remove a temporary coronavirus-related increase to Universal Credit payments.
Meanwhile, the Government is under fire from council bosses as they accused ministers of short changing them on funding to tackle child poverty.
Councillor David Mellen, the leader of Nottingham City Council, claimed the Government was guilty of ‘double-counting’ funding provided to local authorities.
George Osborne, the former Tory chancellor, today claimed a Government U-turn on free school meals is inevitable
Mr Osborne said Marcus Rashford, a leading campaigner on the issue, had ‘nutmegged’ Boris Johnson who now needed to admit it was ‘game over’
Mr Rashford, pictured arriving at Manchester United’s training ground this morning, is leading efforts to force the Government to extend the free school meals programme to cover school holidays
The Government is facing growing calls to retreat over its refusal to extend the free school meals programme to future holidays.
Campaigners, led by Mr Rashford, argue the extension is needed because many families have been left struggling financially because of the coronavirus crisis.
But the Government is so far refusing to give any ground and has instead opted to point to help and funding that is already in place.
Mr Osborne said today that Mr Rashford had already ‘nutmegged the British state once’ by forcing ministers to extend the meals to school holidays earlier this year.
The former Tory MP said the Government had therefore ‘set the precedent’ which it will not be able to get away from.
Mr Osborne argued if the food vouchers were ‘justified at Easter, and then again in the summer (thanks to Rashford), how can they not be justified at Christmas?’.
Writing in the Evening Standard, he said: ‘With Tory MPs getting nervy, another Government U-turn is inevitable.
‘We’ll see if it comes in the form of food vouchers, new school holiday clubs or as a large bung to councils.
‘This Downing Street team came into office saying they were much smarter than their predecessors, and wouldn’t make the mistake of chasing headlines. That’s a bold claim.
‘But their ministers have been made to look like a school yard football team, all running in a panic after the ball — until a professional came onto the pitch and put it into the back of their net.’
Mr Osborne said the Government needed to ‘realise that it’s game over’.
Earlier Mr Zahawi had risked a backlash as he told Sky News this morning: ‘The best way to deal with this is through both local government and through the welfare system and that is the right thing to do.
‘We have run a pilot costing £9million this summer, feeding 50,000 children, we will take the learning from that.
‘It is not just about the food. As I said, I spoke to Carol Shanahan in Stoke on Trent [the chairman of Port Vale Football Club], she tells me that in wards where families want to keep their children safe during those activities they also appreciate the food but more important than the food to them was the activities for their children.’
Mr Zahawi’s comments come after he last week insisted struggling parents would rather pay for meals for their children than accept the ‘label’ attached to handouts.
The minister, who co-founded the YouGov polling firm, said Universal Credit benefits were available to support hard-pressed families and suggested research from holiday clubs showed parents prefer to pay a small sum for food.
He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: ‘The research when we did the pilot demonstrates that families didn’t just want the meals.
‘Although they valued the meals, they didn’t like the labelling of them being free. They actually prefer to pay a modest amount, £1 or £2.’
It came as Mr Mellen accused the Government of failing to live up to its promises on funding to tackle child poverty.
He told Sky News: ‘The Government has given a shortfall in council funding over many years, 10 years of reductions.
‘They promised at the beginning of this year that they would stand shoulder to shoulder with us and meet the needs of our Covid costs and our lost income.
‘We are still several tens of millions short on that promise.
‘I am not convinced that the Government are not double-counting here on the money that they are saying that we already have to meet this need.’
He added: ‘They do that quite often.’
The Prime Minister insisted yesterday the Government would not allow children to go hungry but he refused to bow to demands to extend the free school meals programme.
Mr Johnson highlighted the money already given to councils and said Universal Credit was ‘one of the best ways you can help families in this tough time’.
Mr Sunak echoed a similar sentiment today as he told BBC Radio 1’s Newsbeat programme that ‘we should be able to trust local councils in different areas to make decisions for their people’.
He added: ‘So I don’t think it’s always the right answer that central government comes in and dictates things.’
The Government has increased Universal Credit payments by £20 per week during the pandemic but that increase is due to be scrapped in April next year.
Tory MPs are now calling on ministers to keep the increase in place for longer as they also said the Government should simply U-turn now on free school meals.
Former Cabinet minister Stephen Crabb said the Government should have conceded on the issue last week.
‘I think the Government should just deal with this head on, concede on the issue of vouchers but say very clearly and firmly that vouchers at best are not a long-term solution,’ he said.
Mr Crabb said the Government has created a political problem with ministers talking up the role of Universal Credit.
He said the fact it is a temporary increase is in ‘the small print’, adding: ‘We are on course to cut that money back in just a few months time and for me that’s just unconscionable.
‘You can’t give money to some of the poorest people in the country and then go out publicly and celebrate that fact and then say ‘oh by the way, even though we may still be living with the consequences of the pandemic next April we are going to cut that money back by around £20 per week, £100 per month’.
‘And that’s going to be a much bigger headache for the Government than school meals.’
Mr Dimbleby told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that the Government should be doing more to tackle food poverty.
He said: ‘The first thing to say is this problem is real, it should go without saying it is serious, it is immediate and it is going to get worse as unemployment gets worse and that the Government isn’t doing enough.
‘One in seven families already are reporting not being able to afford enough food. Projections of unemployment range from 1.4 million at the end of the year to 4.4 million, versus 500,000 at the beginning of the year.
‘We know that before this crisis 17 million working people only had £100 of saving to fall back on. We are going to have a situation where a lot of people with high fixed costs who didn’t imagine for a moment they would find themselves unemployed at the beginning of the year are going to struggle to feed their family.
‘The Government really must act.’
He also dismissed the suggestion that Universal Credit is the best way to help struggling families feed their children.
He said: ‘I think that the £20 rise is welcome, as I say, Universal Credit is not a large amount of money for the vast majority of people on it – 59 per cent of people on Universal Credit are living in poverty.
‘However, there is really strong evidence that in-kind support, directly providing nutritious food is much more effective at improving children’s diets than increases in the overall financial value, by the same small amounts.
‘I would say as well as keeping the increase in Universal Credit there is clear evidence that providing in-kind evidence works.’