- The low-calorie ice cream brand has been hit with its second lawsuit this year
- Dissatisfied customers have alleged Halo Top intentionally underfills its pints
- Youssif Kamal and Gillian Neely, of California, filed the lawsuit earlier this year
- They claim within the last three years they have received less than a full pint
- The men are suing the brand for an unspecified amount of money for damages
Halo Top has been sued for a second time this year for ‘dramatically’ underfilling its pints of ice cream.
Youssif Kamal and Gillian Neely, both of California, filed the class action lawsuit earlier this month.
The two dissatisfied customers have alleged that the brand, which is known for being low in calories and sugar, has been intentionally underfilling its pints ‘from time to time’ within the last three years.
Halo Top (file image) has been sued for a second time this year for ‘dramatically’ underfilling its pints of ice cream. Youssif Kamal and Gillian Neely, both of California, filed the class action lawsuit this month
According to Today.com, both men claim that they wouldn’t have purchased the dessert had they known they wouldn’t be getting a full pint.
‘Purchasers of the premium-priced ice cream simply have no idea how much ice cream they will get each and every time they buy a Halo Top “pint,”‘ the lawsuit says.
‘Halo Top knows it is short-changing its customers, but refuses to do anything about it,’ the complaint goes on to say.
The plaintiffs are seeking an unspecified amount for damages.
A DailyMail.com request for comment to Halo Top was not immediately returned.
Last month, a man sued Halo Top over their ‘deceptive’ labels.
The man claimed that the product doesn’t contain the amount of fat required to call itself ice cream.
Halo Top’s entire pints have fewer than 400 calories, and it emphasizes the full calorie count on the front of its package.
The two dissatisfied customers have alleged that the brand, which is known for being low in calories and sugar, has been intentionally underfilling its pints (file image) ‘from time to time’ within the last three years. The are seeking an unspecified amount for damages
Advertisement
- Mystery as cops probe ANOTHER early morning shooting at…
- Man, 33, dies after being hit by LIGHTNING while standing…
- First look at the new postcard-sized 1040 from the IRS-…
- Trump hails the heroism of World War II Army officer who…
- North Dakota mayor who was terrorized by white…
- El Chapo’s beauty queen wife, 28, brings their twin…
- EXCLUSIVE: Fake news! Russian pop star at the center of…
- ‘I hear it’s happening’: Don Jr superimposes his father’s…
- Ice pick killer, 66, on death row who confessed to…
- ‘Paranoid’ missing Florida woman, 30, is found safe a…
- Man, 20, sprinkles COCAINE over Nashville police…
- Air Force veteran, 58, protesting against the VA burns…
- Legendary filmmaker David Lynch says his comment that…
- Former NSA contractor named Reality Winner pleads guilty…
- ‘It was a contract’: Entrepreneur accused of keeping…
- Trump calls Maxine Waters ‘the face of the Democrats’…
- Mueller probe focus is on whether Trump obstructed…
- Texas father is charged in his two-month-old son’s death…