Facebook’s attempts at undermining Snap are detailed in a dossier called ‘Project Voldemort’ which reveals how influencers were ‘threatened with having their blue tick removed’ if they promoted rival social network among other dirty tactics
- The lawyers at Snap kept a dossier on Facebook’s attempts to undercut its success which dates back years
- It is now part of an anti-trust investigation into whether Facebook has too much power
- Facebook tried to buy Snap and Zuckerberg told Evan Spiegel to either accept the price he was offering or face years of competition, it is claimed
- Facebook then blacklisted Snapchat on its channels and stopped any content from it going viral
- Instagram execs believe Facebook also directly threatened influencers who included links to their Snap profiles
- They allegedly threatened to remove their coveted ‘verified’ blue tick
Facebook tried to undermine rivals including Snap by telling influencers not to include external links to their sites and threatening to remove their blue ticks on Instagram if they did, according to documents contained in a dossier on its dirty tactics labelled Project Voldemort.
The tactic is one of several used by Facebook to try to squash competition, according to officials cited by The Wall Street Journal on Monday.
Others include Mark Zuckerberg allegedly telling Snap CEO Evan Spiegel that if he did not agree to sell to him at his desired price, he would face years of Zuckerberg trying to duplicate Snap’s features.
He is said to have given the same ultimatum to Dennis Crowley, co-founder of Foursquare Inc.
The tactics are among those now being examined by government anti-trust investigation into Zuckerberg and the company.
Mark Zuckerberg tried to threaten Evan Spiegel by telling him to accept the price he was offering for Snap, formerly known as Snapchat. Snap Inc CEO Evan Spiegel turned down Facebook’s offer to buy it for $3billion in 2013
According to the Journal’s report, insiders at Snap – formerly known as Snapchat – have long been accustomed to Facebook’s attempts to trample competitors.
For years, the legal team at Snap has been keeping a file on those efforts.
The file was given the suitably nefarious name Project Voldemort, in reference to the all-seeing Harry Potter villain whose name is seldom spoken for fear of retribution.
Snap insiders believe Facebook tried to undercut its success in a number of ways including discouraging popular account holders, mimicking its features like stickers or filters, and directly telling influencers not to promote it on Instagram – which Facebook owns.
They suspect that Facebook actively took steps to stop Snap content from trending on its site.
They say that despite users employing hashtags like ‘Snapchat’, content was never promoted on Instagram’s ‘explore’ feature. They also think that Instagram blocked searches of Snap hashtags.
Another tactic was to approach influencers and threaten to shrink their platform if they promoted Snap.
According to the dossier, Facebook told the influencers they would risk being stripped of their blue ticks which verifies them as legitimate users if they kept promoting Snap.
Facebook was able to learn about how popular Snap was becoming after acquiring Onavo, an Israeli start-up which was an analytics company.
Facebook soon started imitating Snap’s most popular features – its stickers and filters – after they were released. Left, an example of a Snap. Right, a tile from a Facebook story
It redirected internet search traffic to Facebook’s servers so Facebook could see which apps people were using most.
While they would not have been able to see the content that was being shared on Snap, if a user had both Snap and Onavo on their phones, Facebook would be able to tell how often they used Snap.
Onavo claimed to protect users privacy when they searched the internet.
It was shut down amid growing concern about Facebook’s data privacy policies earlier this year.
In 2016, Instagram implemented an all-out ban on adding Snap links to Instagram bios.
Zuckerberg has been under constant fire for the last two years with concerns over his tech monopoly ranging from privacy and data concerns to politics and censorship.
He is being told by Congress to sell WhatsApp and Instagram to dilute his market share.
The lawmakers say he cannot be trusted to self-govern, especially given how many scandals it has been rocked by. He is resisting on every turn.