Inquiry into baby and mother deaths at scandal-hit NHS trust is widened to investigate more than 250 families – after starting out with just 16
- The inquiry into Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust has expanded
- When it was announced by the Government in 2017, 16 families came forward
- A panel of experts set up to review its findings was disbanded last week
An inquiry into maternity care at hospitals has grown to include more than 250 families – 15 times as many as it began with.
The investigation into Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust has reportedly already met with 50 families as its remit continues to expand.
Former Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt ordered the investigation in 2017 after at least seven babies died at the trust during a four-year period.
But a panel of experts set up to judge the inquiry was disbanded last week amid fears members would have conflicts of interest.
Rhiannon Davies from Ludlow, Shropshire, pictured with her daughter Kate moments after she was born on March 1, 2009. The infant died just six hours later
The inquiry will look into alleged poor maternity care at the Shropshire hospital trust over the past 19 years.
After the review was first announced only 16 families came forward, the NHS trust said, but there are now more than 250, the Health Service Journal reported.
It’s being led by Donna Ockenden, former chair of the Royal College of Midwives, who revealed the expansion of the investigation in a letter to parents.
Ms Ockenden now has more than 20 medical professionals on her team working to investigate the quality of care families received at the trust’s maternity units.
She said in the letter seen by the HSJ: ‘Our work is continuing, and we are making good progress.
‘The review itself is of a very significant size – with more than 250 families’ cases now making up the cases under review.
‘As chair of this important review I know that the entire team is absolutely committed to working together and pooling their years of experience in a “search for the truth”.
‘We are progressing well in considering thousands of pages of documentation, and have met more than 50 families face to face so far.’
A panel of experts set up to look at the review’s findings was last week disbanded following complaints from families.
They said involving staff from the Care Quality Commission (CQC), Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) could jeopardise the independence of its findings, because both had been involved in positive reports about the trust.
There was also concern about the Royal College of Midwives being on the panel because it is representing some of the staff involved in the cases.
After the panel was scrapped Ms Ockenden admitted it had caused ‘confusion and upset’ but insisted her inquiry wouldn’t be watered down.
She said all the specialists on her team – including midwives, neonatologists, obstetricians, paediatricians and anaesthetists – are ‘completely independent’.
As a result of the review now including so many more families, it is not expected to be completed before the end of the year.
Ms Ockenden acknowledged some families had ‘suffered terribly for many years’ and in her letter added: ‘It is therefore so important that the maternity review team is given the time needed to undertake this vitally important piece of work.
‘We cannot yet give a timescale for completion. As the review has grown so considerably in size, completion is likely to be the end of the year.’