A city supervisor and nurses pushing to remove Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s name from San Francisco General hospital.
The hospital has been named after Zuckerberg and his wife Dr. Priscilla Chan since they donated $75million to the hospital’s foundation in 2015.
It was then the single largest contribution by private individuals in support of a public hospital in the United States but came with the condition of it being renamed Zuckerberg San Francisco General hospital.
Staff at the hospital voiced their concern then and ever since but the name change was passed by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors as the donation allowed the city to rebuild the century-old hospital and establish a new trauma center.
Now San Francisco supervisor Matt Haney is calling for the Facebook founder’s name to be removed in light of the recent backlash the site has received over failure combat hate speech.
Nurses have been protesting for years after a hospital was renamed the Zuckerberg San Francisco General hospital following a $75million donation from the Facebook CEO
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, pictured, continues to court controversy as calls increase for his name to be removed from San Francisco General Hospital in light of the recent backlash the social media giant and its founder has received over failure combat hate speech
Haney states that nurses have been pushing for some time to have Zuckerberg’s name removed but that the desire to have the hospital renamed has heightened as Facebook continues to be a source of controversy.
‘Massive advertising boycott of Facebook for failing to regulate hate speech & disinformation. Huge staff walk outs & protests. Cozy relationship w Trump, $ to Republicans,’ Haney wrote in a lengthy Twitter thread.
‘Much of it seems directly tied to Mark Zuckerberg. Why is his name still on our SF public general hospital?’ he asked.
Haney claims that nurses have been wearing badges for some time to support the removal of the businessman’s name as well as looking for a way to change it back without losing the donation.
‘I understand that he paid for it,’ Haney added.
‘Many at SEIU 1021, nurses like Sasha Cuttler, working for years to get it removed, reconsider contract, put pressure on Zuck to allow it be removed. I obviously understand how it got there—many are working to organize to overturn it.
‘Everyone who says it’s because of money. I know, I’m well aware that he made a donation. It was before I was on the board [of supervisors]. There are options to still remove it, and nurses who have been working on a strategy that wouldn’t lose us millions.’
Haney said that he is not criticizing the donation and that the removal should be done in a manner that ensure’s the hospital won’t lose money but that large donations should not be awarded to health care centers in return for advertising for those contributing the money.
‘$75 million is a big donation, and it’s welcomed and appreciated. It shouldn’t require permanent naming rights, advertising, on our public hospital. SF taxpayers have given billions to the hospital, it’s their building,’ he wrote.
‘No one is criticizing the donation. But it shouldn’t come w, “hey I’m not a doctor or nurse, but for the $, put my name on SF’s public hospital for 50 years.”’
Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Dr. Priscilla Chan, pictured, donated $75million in 2015. It was the single largest contribution by private individuals in support of a public hospital in the U.S. but came with the condition of being renamed Zuckerberg San Francisco General hospital
San Francisco supervisor Matt Haney is calling for the Facebook founder’s name to be removed in light of the recent backlash the site has received over failure combat hate speech
‘This has been a concern of nurses at S.F. General for years. They’ve been pretty clear about their position on it, many of them wear buttons that read “UnZuck SFGH”,’ Haney continued.
‘The option the nurses prefer—a ballot measure calling for it to be changed, put up for a public vote.
‘Their view is that if it passed, Zuckerberg wouldn’t sue to stop the name from being removed. The name on the PUBLIC hospital is unseemly, even regardless of his recent inactions
‘NOBODY wants the hospital to lose tens of millions, especially not the frontline nurses, of course not. No one is advocating for an approach that would lead to that. Their goal is to get to a place where it could be withdrawn without losing money.’
Haney also noted that Facebook’s own employee’s have been unhappy at the company and its inaction against hate speech, recently sparking protests and walkouts.
‘A lot of those FB employees are PISSED about what he has been doing, there have been massive walk outs. This isn’t an attack on FB employees at all, it’s in solidarity,’ he claimed.
‘I bet a lot of them, maybe majority, would agree that their CEO’s name shouldn’t be on SF’s public hospital.’
Some staff at the hospital are said to be wearing these badges in protest of the name
San Francisco supervisor Matt Haney has joined nurses’ calls for the change
The push to remove Zuckerberg’s name was ongoing well before the recent staff walkouts and the current advertising boycott from companies criticizing Facebook.
Nurses had become vocal by at least May 2018 , staging protests about the name change.
It came after data breaches and privacy scandals at Facebook left hospital staff and patients concerned.
‘The patients are afraid. I know people who go to the doctor and they’re afraid to tell the doctor what’s going on because they don’t know who is going to get that information,’ nurse Sasha Cuttler told ABC 7.
‘People are afraid. I’ve spoken with people who have said, ‘I’m afraid to tell my doctor anything, because I don’t know who is going to get that information,”‘ Cuttler added to KPIX-TV.
‘It’s fine to have somebody’s name and to accept a donation and fundraising, but that doesn’t mean you can do whatever you like with patient data.’
San Francisco supervisor Matt Haney posted a lengthy thread calling for the name change
Others were concerned that Zuckerberg’s name clouded the legacy of the hospital.
‘It’s all the more reason to get it off of here, so we can get our identity back as the city and county’s public hospital,’ said nursing assistant Mark Dingle of the 146-year-old facility.
Even members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors admitted the name change may not have been a good idea.
‘Look it’s a double-edged sword, and I totally get the loyalty to the name as it was historically, but this is a thing that’s between the donors and the Board of Supervisors completely,’ Brent Andrew, the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital’s chief communications officer told the New York Times in 2018.
‘Had we known what we know now, perhaps we wouldn’t have accepted the funds from Zuckerberg,’ former supervisor John Avalos had added.
The most recent push comes as Zuckerberg is placed under fire by advertisers boycotting Facebook.
On Monday Facebook erased almost $60billion from its market value Monday after a massive two-day stock decline as more advertisers joined the boycott of the social network.
A long list of companies have pulled advertising from Facebook Inc in support of a campaign that called out the social media giant for not doing enough to stop hate speech on its platforms.
The Stop Hate for Profit campaign was started by several U.S. civil rights groups after the death of black man George Floyd in police custody triggered widespread protests against racial discrimination in the United States.
Zuckerberg said in a Facebook Live video on Friday that the company would begin labeling ‘harmful’ content from politicians that remains ‘newsworthy’
The campaign has criticized Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to not moderate the U.S. president, in particular, after the Facebok CEO defended his decision not to limit Trump’s often controversial, incendiary and inaccurate posts.
Companies such as Starbucks and Ford recently added their names to the list despite attempts by Zuckerberg to do a u-turn on the company’s hate speech policy.
He announced policy tweaks Friday that included labels for ‘harmful’ posts from public figures.
Zuckerberg has dismissed calls for him to resign from Facebook as ‘ridiculous’ after facing backlash from employees at the charity he and his wife run over his refusal to crack down on Trump’s posts and hate speech.
The billionaire faced calls to resign from either Facebook or the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, which he started with his wife Priscilla Chan, during a town hall meeting last week with the charity’s employees.
An engineer confronted the Facebook founder over his refusal to moderate President Donald Trump’s posts and said that his decisions at the social media giant reflected on him as a leader.
According to a video of the remarks, which was obtained by Recode, Zuckerberg said that employees needed to decide for themselves if they wanted to work for the charity if they disagreed with the decisions he made at Facebook.