Proof of crucifixions in the ancient world? 2,000-year-old skeleton with a hole in its foot is found

A 2,000-year-old Roman skeleton with a hole in his foot could provide rare proof of crucifixions in the ancient world. 

Found during an excavation of a tomb in northern Italy, the skeleton is the second only piece of evidence of the type of ‘torture that killed Jesus’.

The first was a 19cm nail found in the body of a Jewish man discovered in a tomb in Jerusalem in 1968.  

Evidence of crucifixions are so rare because wooden crosses quickly disintegrate.

The nails were also believed to have magical properties, so they were often taken from a victim. 

But ancient texts suggest the Romans practiced crucifixion – literally ‘fixed to a cross’ – for nearly a millennium on tens of thousands of people, including Jesus.

Roman orator Cicero noted that ‘of all punishments, it is the most cruel and most terrifying’. 

 The skeleton was found around 37 miles (60km) from Venice in the Po valley and had ‘particular lesions’ on the right heel (pictured). Ancient literature suggests tens of thousands of revolutionaries were crucified by the Roman empire yet until 1968 no victim had been found

The skeleton was found around 37 miles (60km) from Venice in the Po valley and had ‘particular lesions’ on the right heel.

‘The importance of the discovery lies in the fact that it is the second case documented in the world,’ co-author Ursula Thun Hohenstein from the University of Ferrara told Italian paper Estense.

It was not possible to radiocarbon date the skeleton because the bones’ surfaces have been poorly preserved.

However, the remains were found next to typical Roman bricks and tiles, which  suggests it comes from the Roman period. 

‘Here we suggest crucifixion as a possible cause of the lesion, but this interpretation is complicated by the poor preservation of the bone surfaces and the damage and holes in other skeletal parts’, researchers wrote in the paper published in the journal Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

The crucified man would have been between 30 to 34 years old, according to their findings.

A 2,000-year-old Roman skeleton with a hole in its foot could provide proof of the type of cruel capital punishment that may have killed Jesus. Pictured is The Crucified Christ painted between 1610 and 1611 by Flemish artist Rubens

A 2,000-year-old Roman skeleton with a hole in its foot could provide proof of the type of cruel capital punishment that may have killed Jesus. Pictured is The Crucified Christ painted between 1610 and 1611 by Flemish artist Rubens

WHAT WAS THE FIRST PROOF OF ROMAN CRUCIFIXION?

Ancient literature suggests tens of thousands of people were crucified by the Roman empire yet until 1968 no victim had been found. 

The older male had an seven inch (18cm) nail on his heel 

The older male had an seven inch (18cm) nail on his heel 

In 1968 Vassilios Tzaferis, who received a Ph.D. from Hebrew University in Jerusalem, excavated the body of a Jewish man believed to be from a well-to-do family who was most likely convicted for a political crime.

The man lived in Jerusalem sometime between the turn of the era and 780AD.

The tombs were found in a massive Second Temple Jewish cemetery in the Giv’at HaMivtar neighbourhood.

Researchers found the bones of two generations of males – one 20-24 years old and the other just three or four.

The older male had an seven inch (18cm) nail on his heel. 

Attached to it was a piece of olive wood that would have been remnants of the cross he was pinned to.

Dr Tzaferis claims that the Assyrians, Phoenicians and Persians all practised crucifixion at this time.

Three-dimensional images of the hole in the heel were created using a hi-tech digital microscope, writes the Times of Israel.

They discovered the lesion passed through the ‘entire width’ of the heel bone.

‘The perforation (length 24 mm) shows a regular round hole passing from the medial side (diameter 9 mm) to the lateral one (diameter 6.5 mm)’, the authors wrote.

‘The pattern of the cross-sectional lesion is linear in the first part, turning slightly downward in the last part’.

They say this is evidence the heel was nailed to a hard surface before the victim died.

The scientists suggest the upper limbs were ‘fixed to the cross by nails through the wrist, as per ancient historical sources’.

He was found ‘with the upper limbs at his side and the lower limbs outstretched’, which was an unusual position. 

They way the invididual is buried – alone and without goods – suggests that he was part of a marginalised population or in a condition of captivity. 

The skeleton was found around 37 miles (60km) from Venice in the Po valley and had 'particular lesions' on the right heel

The skeleton was found around 37 miles (60km) from Venice in the Po valley and had ‘particular lesions’ on the right heel

WHAT IS CRUCIFIXION AND WHY IS THERE SO LITTLE EVIDENCE OF IT?

What is crucifixion?

Crucifixion was a Roman method of punishment and literally means ‘fixed to a cross’.

A victim would eventually die from asphyxiation or exhaustion and it was long, drawn-out, and painful.

The act was used to publicly humiliate slaves and criminals, as well as an execution method usually reserved for individuals of very low status or those whose crime was against the state.

This is the reason given in the Gospels for Jesus’ crucifixion

As King of the Jews, Jesus challenged Roman imperial supremacy (Matt 27:37; Mark 15:26; Luke 23:38; John 19:19–22).

Crucifixion could be carried out in a number of ways.

In Christian tradition, nailing the limbs to the wood of the cross is assumed, with debate centring on whether nails would pierce hands or the more structurally sound wrists.

But Romans did not always nail crucifixion victims to their crosses, and instead sometimes tied them in place with rope.

In fact, until recently the only archaeological evidence for the practice of nailing crucifixion victims is an ankle bone from the tomb of Jehohanan, a man executed in the first century CE.

Why is there so little evidence of it? 

The victims were normally criminals and their bodies were often thrown into rubbish dumps meaning archaeologists never see their bones.

Identification is made even more difficult by scratch marks from scavenging animals.

The nails were widely believe to have magical properties. 

This meant they were rarely left in the victim’s heel and the holes they left might be mistaken for puncture marks.

Most of the damage was largely on soft-tissue so damage to the bone may have not been that significant.

Finally, wooden crosses often don’t survive as they degrade or end up being re-used. 

This also increases the likelihood that this damage relates to crucifixion. 

The first evidence of crucifixion was found in 1968 by archaeologist Vassilios Tzaferis, who received a Ph.D. from Hebrew University in Jerusalem.

He excavated the body of a Jewish man believed to be from a well-to-do family who was most likely convicted for a political crime.

He lived in Jerusalem sometime between the turn of the era and 780AD.

The tombs were found in a massive Second Temple Jewish cemetery in the Giv’at HaMivtar neighborhood.

Researchers found the bones of two generations of males – one 20-24 years old and the other just three or four.

The older male had an seven inch (18cm) nail on his heel. 

Attached to it was a piece of olive wood that would have been remnants of the cross he was pinned to, Dr Tzaferis claims.



Read more at DailyMail.co.uk