Quincy Jones is stripped of £5million in royalties for some of Michael Jackson’s biggest hits

Music legend Quincy Jones is stripped of £5million in royalties for some of Michael Jackson’s biggest hits

  • Jury awarded Quincy Jones around £7.5million in 2017 in royalties and fees 
  • Claim stemmed from use of songs Jones produced that appear in film This Is It 
  • Appeals court stripped the renowned producer of £5.5million of original sum

Legendary music producer Quincy Jones has had £5million taken away from him after a decision to grant him £7.5million ($9.4million) in royalties and fees from Michael Jackson’s estate went to a Californian appeal court.

Jones, who has more than 60 Grammy nominations to his name, was awarded around £7.5million in 2017 for use of songs produced by Jones that were used in Jackson’s concert film This Is It and two Cirque du Soleil shows. 

California’s 2nd District Court of Appeal this week ruled that the jury misinterpreted a contract that was the judge’s job to interpret anyway. 

It took away around £5.5million ($6.9million) that jurors had said MJJ Productions owed Jones for his work on Billie Jean, Thriller, and more of Jackson’s biggest hits.

Quincy Jones, pictured in February 2019 at a gala in his honour hosted by will.i.am

Michael Jackson, pictured at a concert in 1988, worked with Quincy Jones on albums such as Thriller, Off the Wall and Bad

Michael Jackson, pictured at a concert in 1988, worked with Quincy Jones on albums such as Thriller, Off the Wall and Bad 

The appeals court found that the jury wrongly granted Jones money from licensing fees, wrongly went beyond the 10% royalty rate Jones was owed for record sales, and incorrectly granted Jones money for remixes of Jackson’s master recordings.

The court kept intact around £2million ($2.5 million) of the award, which Jones said he was owed for the use of his masters in This Is It and other fees.

The court also rejected a counter-appeal from the 87-year-old Jones arguing that the trial court should have allowed him to make a claim of financial elder abuse.

‘While we disagree with portions of the Court’s decision and are evaluating our options going forward, we are pleased that the Court affirmed the jury’s determination that MJJP failed to pay Quincy Jones more than $2.5m that it owed him,’ Jones’ attorney J. Michael Hennigan said in a statement. 

Jones, who was already a music business giant when he produced the classic Jackson albums Off the Wall, Thriller and Bad, had sought $30 million from the estate when he first filed the lawsuit in 2013.

‘Quincy Jones was the last person we thought would try to take advantage of Michael Jackson by filing a lawsuit three years after he died asking for tens of millions of dollars he wasn’t entitled to,’ Jackson attorney Howard Weitzman said in a statement. 

‘We knew the verdict was wrong when we heard it, and the court of appeal has completely vindicated us.’

On the stand during the trial, Jones was asked by Weitzman whether he realised he was essentially suing Jackson himself

Jones angrily disagreed.

‘I’m not suing Michael,’ he said. ‘I’m suing you all.’

Once the lead singer of The Jackson 5, Michael Jackson died in 2009 at the age of 50

Once the lead singer of The Jackson 5, Michael Jackson died in 2009 at the age of 50 

The trial centered on the definitions of terms in the two contracts Jackson and Jones signed in 1978 and 1985.

Under the deals, for example, Jones is entitled to a share of net receipts from a ‘videoshow’ of the songs. The Jackson attorneys argued that the term was meant to apply to music videos and not feature films like This Is It.

The film was created from rehearsal footage for a comeback tour that Jackson was working toward when he died in 2009 at age 50.

‘So many people have tried to take advantage of Michael and mischaracterise him since his death,’ Jackson estate co-executor John Branca said in a statement Tuesday. 

‘It’s gratifying that in this case the court in an overwhelmingly favourable and just decision, recognises that Michael Jackson was both an enormous talent and an extremely fair business executive.’

Read more at DailyMail.co.uk