The calls of more than a dozen songbird species follow patterns that are similar to those used in human speech, a new study claims.
Zoologists at McGill University in Canada analysed calls of 15 bird species, including the wild canary, zebra finch, common chaffinch, swamp sparrow and sedge warbler.
The longer the phrase, the shorter the individual sounds within, they found – a pattern already observed in humans and known as Menzerath’s law.
Menzerath’s law, named after the German phonetician Paul Menzerath, says that larger linguistic structures are made up of shorter parts.
As the law goes, longer words contain extra syllables, but these syllables tend to be briefer.
Adult male zebra finches (left) learn their songs and use them during courtship interactions with females (right).
Likewise, the longer a sentence, measured in terms of the number of clauses, the shorter the clauses.
Amazingly, the study shows that birdsong follows Menzerath’s law – in that the greater the whole, the smaller the individual constituents.
Linguists speculate the law may make communication more efficient by making things easier to understand or say – not just for humans, but for other animals too.
The McGill researchers found negative relationships between the number and duration of constituents in all 15 species – showing evidence of the law in birds.
‘Although we see Menzerath’s Law in all the songbird species we looked at, and others have seen it among primates and penguins, we aren’t sure this necessarily reflects enhanced communication efficiency in non-human animals,’ said study author Jon Sakata, a professor in McGill’s Biology Department.
‘It is possible that these patterns of communication that we saw in songbirds are caused by physical predispositions and constraints.’
When we listen to songbirds, we can hear repeated melodies or phrases. Each phrase is made up of distinct sounds, strung together.
The wild canary (Serinus canaria). The relationship between the number and duration of syllables in a phrase was steeper (more negative) than expected by chance for repeat phrases in canaries, swamp sparrows, canyon towhees, Oregon juncos, and northern mockingbirds
Graphical abstract from the team’s research paper. The team found negative relationships between the number and duration of constituents in all 15 species – showing evidence of the law in birds
A well-known example of bird song found around the UK is that of the common wood pigeon (Columba palumbus), which has a distinct five note call.
The research, detailed in the journal Current Biology, found the songbird species tended to use shorter ‘elements’ (in this case sounds rather than spoken words) when they were putting together longer phrases.
In humans, Menzerath’s Law may just make communication more efficient by making things easier to understand or say.
However, in the case of birds, it could be the case that their vocal sounds are just constrained by the physiology of their syrinx, the avian vocal organ at the top of the windpipe.
Interestingly, the study also found the brain mechanisms regulating breathing and vocal muscles seem to be organised in similar ways in birds and humans.
Also, when the researchers compared the song patterns of birds that had been typically reared and tutored by their parents with those that had not been taught to sing by their parents (untutored birds), they found the same patterns.
‘The individual units of sound made by untutored birds were very different from those made by the typically raised birds,’ said study author Logan James, now a post-doctoral Fellow at the University of Texas at Austin.
‘However, the “rules” by which they organise these aberrant elements is indistinguishable from typically raised birds.
‘These results suggest that physical predispositions or limitations may play a role in producing these song patterns.’