Bride-to-be reveals her fiancé is ‘mad’ at her for choosing an understated wedding ring because it ‘makes him look CHEAP’ – and commenters agree it looks like ‘a bent paperclip’
- Olga Vilkova, who lives in US, shared a photo of wedding ring she chose herself
- Told Facebook group her fiancé is ‘mad’ as he thinks it ‘makes him look cheap’
- Many agreed, with one comparing it to an easily breakable tiny rubber hairband
A bride-to-be has revealed her fiancé was ‘mad’ at her for choosing a wedding ring that makes him ‘look cheap.’
Olga Vilkova, who is from Russia but lives in North Carolina in the US, shared a photo of her very simple wedding ring to Facebook group That’s It, I’m Ring Shaming and penned:
‘Lol my wedding ring came in yesterday and I picked it out myself and now my fiancé is mad at me because he thinks it makes him look cheap. Rip me a new one because my wedding is in two weeks.’
And many were quick to take to the comments section to say that they too were outraged by the size of the ring.
‘That looks like it’ll break like one of those tiny rubber bands for hair,’ joked one, while a second enthused: ‘I too used to bend paperclips into rings when I was 10.’
Olga Vilkova, who is from Russia but lives in North Carolina in the US, shared a photo of the wedding ring she picked out herself to Facebook group ‘That’s It, I’m Ring Shaming’
The bride-to-be went on to say how her fiancé is ‘mad’ at her choice because he thinks it makes him ‘look cheap’ (pictured)
A third added: ‘As long as the engagement ring cost at least $10K (£7, 748), that should make up for the wedding band being invisible!’ while a fourth joked: ‘Wow calm down, those diamonds are too flashy.’
The ring, which features a plain silver band and five tiny diamonds but is void of any other detail, was compared to everything from electrical wire and glass to a bent paperclip.
‘Another electrical wire ring and glass they keep getting better,’ joked one, while a second wrote: ‘Beyond sad, when a paper clip doesn’t get used for its true purpose.’
A third added: ‘I bet you sorted by “cheapest,”‘ while another penned: ‘This is so sad. I want to start a GoFundMe.’
A further joked: ‘Get your a*** to a Black Friday sale at ANY jewelry store and fix your mess! Hopefully your fiancé will show up.’
Others joked the ring was so small and dainty they struggled to even see it on Olga’s finger (pictured)
Meanwhile, others joked the ring was so small they struggled to even see it on the bride-to-be’s finger.
‘Where’s the ring?’ asked one, while another questioned: ‘I’m sorry, what ring? I don’t see anything.’
Another pointed out: ‘Is there any way you could possibly make that smaller?’
And many were in agreement that Olga’s partner had every reason to be annoyed with her choice.
‘He’s right!…it does!’ commented one, while a second added: ‘He’s not wrong though.’
A third simply wrote: ‘Ok, but did he lie?’ while a further penned: ‘I like how dainty and fine it is. It’s a sweet casual ring to wear on another finger.’
‘However, as a wedding band, this is a charade. No one will think you’re married. The groom should be concerned.’
Another added: ‘Not at all appropriate for a wedding ring. Your poor fiancé!’
Many took to the comments section to suggest Olga’s fiancé isn’t wrong – as it does make him look cheap