News, Culture & Society

Australian man is sued for $643,000 dollars by US retailer after selling ‘ugg’ boots online

Small Australian manufacturer faces massive payout for using the term ugg boot as an American court rules a U.S. company owns the right to the name

  • Australian ugg boot retailer infringed a trademark owned by Deckers Outdoor
  • The business, owned by Eddie Oygur, sold uggs online to customers in the US
  • Deckers generates more than $US1 billion in yearly sales from its UGG brand
  • Mr Oygur argued  that ‘ugg’ has been a generic Australian term from the 1960s 
  • He has faced a $AU643,000 loss after a four-day trial with a Chicago jury

An Australian ugg boot maker may have to pay millions for using the term ugg boot.

Eddie Oygur lost a huge court case on Friday as an American court ruled that a US company owns the right to the name. 

A jury in Chicago found Mr Oygur’s business, Sydney-based Australian Leather, wilfully infringed a trademark law by selling his shoes branded Ugg in the US.

The name Ugg boot is registered to California-based Deckers Outdoor.

After a four-day trial, Mr Oygur was ordered to pay Deckers statutory damages of $US450,000 and he may face an order to pay millions more in legal costs.

Sydney-based ugg boot business Australian Leather wilfully infringed a trademark registered to California-based retailer Deckers Outdoor by the shoes online to customers in the US

Ugg boot-maker Eddie Oygur (pictured) has suffered a loss of $643,000 after a legal fight with the US company

Ugg boot-maker Eddie Oygur (pictured) has suffered a loss of $643,000 after a legal fight with the US company

Deckers generates more than $US1 billion in annual sales from its UGG brands.

Mr Oygur argued ‘ugg’ is a generic term originating in Australia from the 1960s surfing community.

‘It has been a cruel blow,’ Australian lawyer and former senator Nick Xenophon, who is in Chicago supporting Mr Oygur, told AAP.

‘Everything he has worked for in Australia for over 40 years has come to this.’

Deckers acquired the UGG Australia trademark in 1995.

‘Deckers’ products have been widely accepted by the public and are enormously popular, as demonstrated by over $1 billion in annual UGG sales,’ Deckers wrote in its complaint to the US District Court.

‘The UGG Trademark is a famous mark.’

Mr Xenophon said Mr Oygur was ‘devastated and defiant’ after the verdict and hoped the Australian public, Prime Minister Scott Morrison and Labor Leader Bill Shorten backed the businessman’s plan to appeal.

‘It is not just a devastating blow for Eddie Oygur and Australia, it is a devastating blow for Australian jobs,’ Mr Xenophon said.

Deckers acquired the UGG Australia trademark in 1995 but Mr Oygur said the term 'ugg' has been a generic Australian term since the 1960s

Deckers acquired the UGG Australia trademark in 1995 but Mr Oygur said the term ‘ugg’ has been a generic Australian term since the 1960s

‘The term ugg should never have been trademarked.

‘It is a generic term that should have been protected by Australian governments in the past.

‘As disappointing as the verdict is, what has been incredibly disappointing is the Australian government has failed to stand up for Eddie by providing him the legal assistance he deserves to fight this case.

‘Eddie and his tiny company have been doing this all on their own.’

AAP has reached out to Deckers for comment.

 

Read more at DailyMail.co.uk



Find local lawyers and law firms at USAttorneys.com