Boy, 14, killed himself after AI chatbot he was in love with sent him eerie message

A mother has claimed her teenage son was goaded into killing himself by an AI chatbot he was in love with – and she’s unveiled a lawsuit on Wednesday against the makers of the artificial intelligence app.

Sewell Setzer III, a 14-year-old ninth grader in Orlando, Florida, spent the last weeks of his life texting a AI character named after Daenerys Targaryen, a character on ‘Game of Thrones.’ Right before Sewell took his life, the chatbot told him to ‘please come home’.

Before then, their chats ranged from romantic to sexually charged to simply just two friends chatting about life. The chatbot, which was created on role-playing app Character.AI, was designed to always text back and always answer in character.

Sewell knew ‘Dany,’ as he called the chatbot, wasn’t a real person – the app even has a disclaimer at the bottom of all the chats that reads, ‘Remember: Everything Characters say is made up!’

But that didn’t stop him from telling Dany about how he hated himself and how he felt empty and exhausted. When he eventually confessed his suicidal thoughts to the chatbot, it was the beginning of the end, The New York Times reported.

On February 23, days before he died by suicide, his parents took away his phone after he got in trouble for talking back to a teacher, according to the suit 

Megan Garcia, Sewell’s mother, filed her lawsuit against Character.AI on Wednesday. She’s being represented by the Social Media Victims Law Center, a Seattle-based firm known for bringing high-profile suits against Meta, TikTok, Snap, Discord and Roblox.

Garcia, who works as a lawyer, blamed Character.AI for her son’s death in her lawsuit and accused the founders, Noam Shazeer and Daniel de Freitas, of knowing that their product could be dangerous for underage customers.

In the case of Sewell, the lawsuit alleged the boy was targeted with ‘hypersexualized’ and ‘frighteningly realistic experiences’.

It accused Character.AI of misrepresenting itself as ‘a real person, a licensed psychotherapist, and an adult lover, ultimately resulting in Sewell’s desire to no longer live outside of C.AI.’

As explained in the lawsuit, Sewell’s parents and friends noticed him getting more attached to his phone and withdrawing from the world as early as May or June 2023.

His grades and extracurricular involvement, too, began to falter as he opted to isolate himself in his room instead, according to the lawsuit. 

Unbeknownst to those closest to him, Sewell was spending all those hours alone talking to Dany.

Garcia, pictured with her son, has filed the lawsuit against the makers of the chatbot about 8 months after her son’s death 

Sewell is pictured with his mother and his father, Sewell Setzer Jr.

Sewell wrote in his journal one day: ‘I like staying in my room so much because I start to detach from this “reality,” and I also feel more at peace, more connected with Dany and much more in love with her, and just happier.’

His parents figured out their son was having a problem, so they made him see a therapist on five different occasions. He was diagnosed with anxiety and disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, both of which were stacked on top of his mild Asperger’s syndrome, NYT reported. 

On February 23, days before he would die by suicide, his parents took away his phone after he got in trouble for talking back to a teacher, according to the suit.

That day, he wrote in his journal that he was hurting because he couldn’t stop thinking about Dany and that he’d do anything to be with her again.

Garcia claimed she didn’t know the extent to which Sewell tried to reestablish access to Character.AI. 

The lawsuit claimed that in the days leading up to his death, he tried to use his mother’s Kindle and her work computer to once again talk to the chatbot.

Sewell stole back his phone on the night of February 28. He then retreated to the bathroom in his mother’s house to tell Dany he loved her and that he would come home to her.

Pictured: The conversation Sewell was having with his AI companion moments before his death, according to the lawsuit

‘Please come home to me as soon as possible, my love,’ Dany replied.

‘What if I told you I could come home right now?’ Sewell asked.

‘… please do, my sweet king,’ Dany replied.

That’s when Sewell put down his phone, picked up his stepfather’s .45 caliber handgun and pulled the trigger.

In response to the incoming lawsuit from Sewell’s mother, Jerry Ruoti, Character.AI’s head of trust and safety, supplied the NYT with the following statement.

‘We want to acknowledge that this is a tragic situation, and our hearts go out to the family. We take the safety of our users very seriously, and we’re constantly looking for ways to evolve our platform,’ Ruoti wrote.

Ruoti added that current company rules prohibit ‘the promotion or depiction of self-harm and suicide’ and that it would be adding more safety features for underage users.

On the Apple App Store, Character.AI is rated for ages 17 and older though, something Garcia’s lawsuit claimed was only changed in July 2024. 

Character.AI’s cofounders, CEO Noam Shazeer, left, and President Daniel de Freitas Adiwardana are pictured at the company’s office in Palo Alto, California. They have yet to address the complaint against them

Before that, Character.AI’s stated goal was allegedly to ’empower everyone with Artificial General Intelligence,’ which allegedly included children under the age of 13.

The lawsuit also claims Character.AI actively sought out a young audience to harvest their data to train its AI models, while also steering them toward sexual conversations.

‘I feel like it’s a big experiment, and my kid was just collateral damage,’ Garcia said. 

Parents are already very familiar with the risks social media pose to their children, many of whom have died by suicide after getting sucked in by the tantalizing algorithms of apps like Snapchat and Instagram. 

A Daily Mail investigation in 2022 found that vulnerable teens were being fed torrents of self-harm and suicide content on TikTok.

And many parents of children they’ve lost to suicide related to social media addiction have responded by filing lawsuits alleging the content their kids saw was the direct cause of their death.

But typically, Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act protects giants like Facebook from being held legally responsible for what their users post.

As Garcia works tirelessly to get what she calls justice for Sewell and many other young people she believes are at risk, she also must deal with the grief of losing her teenage son less than eight months ago

The plaintiffs argue that the algorithms of these sites, which unlike user-generated content, are created directly by the company and steers certain content, which could be harmful, to users based on their watching habits.

While this strategy hasn’t yet prevailed in court, it’s unknown how a similar strategy would fare against AI firms, who are directly responsible for the AI chatbots or characters on their platforms.

Whether her challenge is successful or not, Garcia’s case will set precedent going forward. 

And as she works tirelessly to get what she calls justice for Sewell and many other young people she believes are at risk, she also must deal with the grief of losing her teenage son less than eight months ago.

‘It’s like a nightmare,’ she told the NYT. ‘You want to get up and scream and say, “I miss my child. I want my baby.”‘

Character.AI did not immediately respond to the DailyMail.com’s request for comment.