Did Manchester City cook the books to avoid Financial Fair Play penalties?

Manchester City have been accused of cheating after claims that their owner paid large parts of inflated sponsorship deals himself.

According to a batch of alleged hacked emails by whistle blowers Football Leaks reported in Der Spiegel, claims have been made that Sheikh Mansour picked up the tab for large parts of agreements with club sponsors as part of attempts by City officials to comply with Uefa’s Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations.

Doubts over the authenticity of the deals, with companies based in the Sheikh’s Abu Dhabi homeland, have long been raised – and, if proved to be genuine, a series of messages suggests all may not be as it seems.

Sheikh Mansour (centre) is accused of picking up the tab for inflated sponsorship deals

Leaked emails claim Manchester City needed to make up £9.9m after sacking Roberto Mancini

Leaked emails claim Manchester City needed to make up £9.9m after sacking Roberto Mancini

City chief Simon Pearce (right) allegedly wrote in a leaked email: 'We can do what we want'

City chief Simon Pearce (right) allegedly wrote in a leaked email: ‘We can do what we want’

WHAT IS FINANCIAL FAIR PLAY?

Financial Fair Play was approved by UEFA in 2010 and first brought into play in 2011. It ensures that clubs who have qualified for UEFA competitions must prove they do not have overdue payables towards other clubs, their players and tax authorities throughout the season.

In short, clubs can spend up to €5m (£3.9m) more than they earn per assessment period, although total losses of £35m are permitted for clubs like City with the wealthiest of owners.

Assessments are now made over a three-year period. In 2014-15, losses were still be limited to £35m. In 2015-16, the limit dropped to £25.5m. The pattern was then repeated in 2016-17 and 2017-18.

Money spent on stadiums, training facilities, youth development or community projects is exempt, but clubs must balance ‘football-related expenditure’ – things like transfers and wages – with television and ticket income.

All of this is overseen by The Club Financial Control Body (CFCB), which was set up by UEFA.

In 2010, one of the allegedly hacked emails reportedly from board member Simon Pearce, communicating with bosses, allegedly discusses a £15m deal with partner Aabar. ‘As we discussed, the annual direct obligation for Aabar is £3m,’ he allegedly wrote. ‘The remaining £12m requirement will come from alternative sources provided by His Highness.’

Der Spiegel say that single sentence confirms accusations that Sheikh Mansour personally paid a portion of sponsorship money.

In another allegedly hacked message, City’s chief financial officer, Jorge Chumillas, allegedly wrote that the club was facing a £9.9m shortfall to comply with FFP thanks to the contract termination of sacked former manager Roberto Mancini. 

Mancini was sacked in 2013, a year to the day after winning the Premier League title. His giant pay-off meant yet more expenditure on City’s books that had to be covered by income under UEFA rules. 

He adds: ‘I think that the only solution left would be an additional amount of AD (Abu Dhabi) sponsorship revenues that covers this gap.’

According to the report, Chumillas goes on to suggest sponsors Etihad pay an extra £1.5m, Aabar £0.5m and the tourism authority £5.5m.

Sergio Aguero won City the league in 2012, but off the field there are some damaging claims

Sergio Aguero won City the league in 2012, but off the field there are some damaging claims

Sheikh Mansour (C) is alleged to have made up £12m of Aabar's annual £15m sponsorship

Sheikh Mansour (C) is alleged to have made up £12m of Aabar’s annual £15m sponsorship

Aguero arrives at Man City's training ground on Sunday, hours after the club's latest win

Aguero arrives at Man City’s training ground on Sunday, hours after the club’s latest win

Financial Fair Play was approved by UEFA in 2010 and first brought into play in 2011. It ensures that clubs who have qualified for UEFA competitions must prove they do not have overdue payables towards other clubs, their players and tax authorities throughout the season.

In short, clubs can spend up to €5m (£3.9m) more than they earn per assessment period, although total losses of £35m are permitted for clubs like City with the wealthiest of owners.

In a further reported email exchange, it is alleged Chumillas asks Pearce if they can change the date of payment from Abu Dhabi sponsors. Pearce responds: ‘Of course, we can do what we want.’

Der Spiegel go on to allege that City’s financial reports are ‘a web of lies’. They say that in another email Pearce allegedly writes that stadium and jersey sponsor Etihad Airways ‘direct contribution remains at a constant £8m’ which does not appear to tally with the actual obligation of £35m.

It is said that £127.5m had been used to supplement Abu Dhabi partnership deals by May 2012

It is said that £127.5m had been used to supplement Abu Dhabi partnership deals by May 2012

Raheem Sterling drives his car into training hours after a huge 6-1 victory over Southampton

Raheem Sterling drives his car into training hours after a huge 6-1 victory over Southampton

The publication claims that annually, the deal was worth £67.5m but say that Chumillas is alleged to have written to Pearce: ‘Please note that out of those £67.5m, £8m should be funded directly by Etihad and 59.5 by ADUG.’ ADUG stands for the Abu Dhabi United Group – City’s ownership vehicle.

When contacted for a response, Etihad told Der Spiegel that the financial obligations associated with the partnership with the club have always been and remain the airline’s ‘sole liability and responsibility’. Aabar and the Abu Dhabi tourism authority reportedly did not respond to the specifics of questions.

The report ends by alleging that internal City calculations noted that by May 2012, when the club won the Premier League, a total of £127.5m had been used to supplement Abu Dhabi partnership deals.

When contacted by Sportsmail, City referred to an earlier statement, which reads: ‘We will not be providing any comment on out of context materials purportedly hacked or stolen from City Football Group and Man City personnel and associated people. The attempt to damage the club’s reputation is organised and clear.’

Read more at DailyMail.co.uk