Heavily tattooed aspiring cop claims she was rejected from the police force

Heavily-tattooed aspiring cop with Pokemon and Disney characters etched into her skin claims she was rejected from the police force because of her ‘awesome’ appearance

  • Kathy-Rose Bullen has full-sleeved tattoos on both arms and has her chest inked
  • She claims she was rejected from the police force because of her appearance
  • She sparked a debate online, with some slamming the police for ‘discrimination’

A heavily-tattooed woman claims she’s been left devastated because she was rejected from the police force over her appearance. 

Kathy-Rose Bullen from Victoria took to Facebook on Monday seeking sympathy after her telling followers her application had fallen through. 

‘I need cheering up, I was rejected from the Police Force today for my physical appearance,’ she said. 

The aspiring cop divided the internet with her claims, with some slamming the police force for ‘discrimination’. 

Kathy Bullen claims she was rejected from the police force because of her appearance

Kathy Bullen, a heavily tattooed aspiring cop, claims she was rejected from the police force because of her ‘physical appearance’ 

The aspiring cop divided the internet with her claims, with some users slamming the police force for 'discrimination'

The aspiring cop divided the internet with her claims, with some users slamming the police force for ‘discrimination’

Ms Bullen has tattooed colourful sleeves on both arms, with Pokemon characters such as Pikachu and Charmander on one.

She has inked Disney cartoon characters Cinderella and Sleeping Beauty on the other. 

Her chest has a pixelated heart with two shotguns pointing towards it. 

The tattoos spread all the way to her fingers and also has both legs inked, with only her knees and feet bare.  

The tattoos spread all the way to her fingers and also has both legs inked, with only her knees and feet bare

The tattoos spread all the way to her fingers and also has both legs inked, with only her knees and feet bare

Ms Bullen’s post has sparked a debate about whether police force candidates can be rejected because of their tattoos. 

‘It’s called discrimination pretty sure there’s a law against that,’ one said. 

‘It’s not discrimination when a job requires you to have inoffensive tattoos and clean hands, neck and face. You’re representing whoever you’re working for and a lot of places have a dress code,’ another said. 

One added: ‘I have seen plenty of women in the police force with tattoo sleeves (by the way, yours look awesome!) but sorry to hear about that.’ 

Yet another wrote: ‘That’s disgusting you look beautiful your tatts shouldn’t be able to stop you that’s horrid they have done that.’ 

Victoria Police told Daily Mail Australia they don’t discuss individual matters.

Tattooed applicants in the state will have their body art assessed on a case-to-case basis if they are on the face, neck and hands. 

New South Wales, Tasmania and Western Australia police prohibit any employees from having tattoos on their face, scalp, ears, neck or hands. 

Tattoos on the neck and hands are prohibited only if they are visible while wearing uniform.  

Northern Territory police do not have any bans on applicants with tattoos. 

Applicants for Queensland police are allowed to have tattoos as long as they aren’t ‘culturally insensitive, rude or offensive, and must be considered within community expectations’.  

The tattoos must not have offensive words, phrases or pictures. 

South Australia police officers can have tattoos but they cannot be visible while on duty. 

Facial tattoos are only permitted in the Australian Capital Territory if they relate to a religious belief or practice. 

Applicants can have tattoos unless they are ‘offensive or inappropriate’, which will need to be covered when uniform is worn.  

Tattooed applicants in Victoria will have their body art assessed on a case to case basis if they are on the face, neck and hands (stock image)

Tattooed applicants in Victoria will have their body art assessed on a case to case basis if they are on the face, neck and hands (stock image) 

Read more at DailyMail.co.uk