Helen McCourt’s killer is to go free as her family loses legal bid to block his release 

The family of Helen McCourt have lost a High Court bid to keep her killer behind bars ahead of a judicial review of the decision to free him.

The 22-year-old disappeared in 1988 but, despite extensive searches, her body was never found.

Ian Simms, who has always maintained his innocence, was found guilty of her abduction and murder at Liverpool Crown Court the following year and given a life sentence with a minimum term of 16 years.

Simms, now aged 63, is due to be freed from prison imminently after an urgent attempt by Helen’s family was refused by senior judges.

Helen McCourt was murdered in 1988

Ian Simms (left, in August 2014), 63, was sentenced to a minimum of 16 years after killing 22-year-old Helen McCourt (right) in 1988 as she walked home from work in Billinge, Merseyside

Lawyers representing Helen’s mother Marie McCourt, who has launched a legal challenge against the Parole Board’s decision to release Simms, argued that he should remain in jail until her case is concluded.

But, following a hearing in London on Tuesday, Lord Justice Dingemans and Mr Justice Fordham refused to postpone his release on licence.

Afterwards, Mrs McCourt’s husband John Sandwell said: ‘We are obviously disappointed with today’s news.

‘Today was a small battle in the war.

‘It was a case of trying to keep him in prison while we go through with the judicial review.

‘Even if he is released now, if the judicial review goes in our favour he will have to go back to prison quite quickly.’

The family have been told Simms could be released within days and will have to live in a bail hostel, be electronically tagged and have to check in with police regularly, Mr Sandwell said.

Lord Justice Dingemans said: ‘We consider that the least worst option in this case is to refuse a stay and therefore not interfere with the release.’

The judge told the court the Parole Board recommended that Simms should be released following a hearing in November 2019.

Marie McCourt holds a picture of her late daughter Helen McCourt after she gave evidence at a Parole Board hearing on November 7 last year

Marie McCourt holds a picture of her late daughter Helen McCourt after she gave evidence at a Parole Board hearing on November 7 last year

The board reviewed its decision following a challenge by Justice Secretary Robert Buckland, but again concluded, on January 8, that Simms should be freed.

Mrs McCourt complains she was not given enough notice of the initial hearing, so only had a short time to prepare her victim personal statement, and was not given access to a 693-page dossier on Simms which was prepared for the board.

Lord Justice Dingemans said Mrs McCourt believes Simms will not disclose where Helen’s remains are if he is released.

WHAT IS HELEN’S LAW?

Marie McCourt wants Britain to adopt ‘Helen’s Law’ – legislation which would prevent the release of killers who have hidden the locations of their victims’ bodies.

She writes on change.org: If parole is granted, my hopes of finding my daughter may never be realised. No other family should live this ordeal.

I, hereby, petition the Prime Minister Theresa May and Home Secretary Amber Rudd to acknowledge the pain and distress caused to the families of missing murder victims by:

Denying parole to murderers for as long as they refuse to disclose the whereabouts of their victim’s remains 

Passing a full life tariff (denying parole or release) until the murderer discloses the location (and enables the recovery) of their victim’s remains 

Automatically applying the following rarely-used common law offences in murder trials without a body*; preventing the burial of a corpse and conspiracy to prevent the burial of a corpse, disposing of a corpse, obstructing a coroner (*as in the case of R v Hunter, 1974 (from Archbold, Criminal Pleading Evidence and Practice 2015) 

However, the judge said the Parole Board, having reviewed the latest psychological evidence on Simms, considers that he would never disclose the location even if he was never set free.

Lawyers representing Simms said he has been in open prison conditions since 2016 and has been released under supervision on a number of occasions.

His barrister, Joanne Cecil, said he would be subject to ‘stringent licence conditions’, which include a curfew, 24-hour electronic monitoring and residing at a specified address, and will be recalled to prison in the event Mrs McCourt’s legal challenge is successful.

A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: ‘We completely understand the pain and anguish that the Parole Board’s decision has caused Marie McCourt and her family.’

He added: ‘The High Court’s ruling means we must now release Ian Simms from custody though he will be recalled if the Court later decides to quash the Parole Board’s decision. He will be on licence for life, subject to strict conditions and probation supervision when released, and he faces a return to prison if he fails to comply.’

Mrs McCourt and her family have campaigned for a change in the law to keep killers locked up until they lead police to a victim’s body.

The Prisoners (Disclosure of Information about Victims) Bill, dubbed Helen’s Law, has failed to be ratified before Parliament on numerous occasions – twice being delayed because of general elections.

It was brought back to Parliament on the same day the Parole Board announced its decision after reconsidering Simms’ release, but no date has yet been set for the Bill to be debated by MPs.

Pub landlord Simms, who was convicted by a jury on overwhelming DNA evidence of Ms McCourt’s abduction and murder, is serving his life sentence at HMP Garth in Leyland, Lancashire.

He has always maintained his innocence over the death of Ms McCourt, an insurance clerk who disappeared on her way home from work in Liverpool in 1988.

Simms was eligible to be considered for release in February 2004.

Read more at DailyMail.co.uk