India’s Supreme Court to consider scrapping gay sex law

India’s Supreme Court is to consider scrapping a colonial-era law upheld in 2013 that criminalises same sex relationships.

In a victory for equal rights campaigners, the court said a larger group of judges will re-examine the constitutional validity of Section 377 – a law that prohibits ‘carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal’ – which has been widely interpreted to refer to gay sex.

‘What is natural to one may not be natural to others,’ the top court said on Monday. 

India’s Supreme Court (pictured) has agreed to reconsider its 2013 decision that criminalises same sex relationships – a victory for equal rights activists campaigning in the country

‘A section of people or individuals who exercise their choice should never remain in a state of fear.’

Lawyer Anand Grover, who appeared for five members of the LGBT community who had petitioned the court seeking a review of the ban, said: ‘It is a big relief and a primary step taken by the Supreme Court to review its earlier order.’

The petitioners had told the court they were living in constant fear of police action because of their sexual orientation.

‘We are being cautiously optimistic about the development today. We have climbed mountains of hope in the past and come toppling down,’ said gay rights activist Harish Iyer and host of ‘Gaydio’, India’s first radio show on LGBT issues.

India’s Supreme Court had in a surprise ruling in 2013 reinstated a ban on gay sex after a four-year period of decriminalisation that had helped bring homosexuality into the open in the socially conservative country.

India’s LGBT community has argued the ban undermines fundamental rights as it fails to protect them. But earlier petitions to review the ban were overturned by the court.

The court said a larger group of judges will re-examine the constitutional validity of Section 377 - a law that prohibits 'carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man' - which has been widely interpreted to refer to homosexual sex (gay rights protest, New Delhi, 2017)

The court said a larger group of judges will re-examine the constitutional validity of Section 377 – a law that prohibits ‘carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man’ – which has been widely interpreted to refer to homosexual sex (gay rights protest, New Delhi, 2017)

India's LGBT community has argued the ban undermines fundamental rights as it fails to protect them. But earlier petitions to review the ban were overturned by the court

India’s LGBT community has argued the ban undermines fundamental rights as it fails to protect them. But earlier petitions to review the ban were overturned by the court

Although the law banning homosexuality is rarely enforced in India, it is used to intimidate, harass, blackmail and extort money from gay people, activists say (Gay Pride, New Delhi, 2015)

Although the law banning homosexuality is rarely enforced in India, it is used to intimidate, harass, blackmail and extort money from gay people, activists say (Gay Pride, New Delhi, 2015)

Although the law banning homosexuality is rarely enforced in India, it is used to intimidate, harass, blackmail and extort money from gay people, activists say.

There are no official figures on the number of cases and most go unreported as victims are too scared to report crimes to the police, fearing they will be punished too, activists say.

Gay sex is punishable by up to 10 years jail under the law.

‘We want to emphasise that we are not asking for any special rights. We are asking for constitutional rights given to any citizen in the country,’ said Koninika Roy from the Humsafar Trust that works with the LGBT community.



Read more at DailyMail.co.uk