JK Rowling has condemned the Scottish National Party’s new self-identification law that makes it easier for people as young as 16 to change gender without seeing a doctor.
The author and women’s rights campaigner, 57, retweeted an article which argued that the Labour Party would pay for supporting Nicola Sturgeon’s ‘trans crusade’.
In The Telegraph piece, former member of Scottish Labour Tom Harris wrote: ‘Let us be clear. Women are right to fear that their spaces will be invaded; that their privacy and safety will be tragically compromised.’
The Bill could lead to gender tourism to Scotland and transgender people in England demanding the same rights, it emerged today.
The vote in Edinburgh yesterday sparked huge protests and puts MSPs on a constitutional collision course with Westminster, where there are deep concerns about the ‘divergence’ in gender laws across the UK.
UK ministers are plotting how to prevent trans people from across the UK heading to Scotland for as little as three months so they can self-identify as male or female without a diagnosis from a doctor.
Government sources told The Times that they feared the new law could be used to allow biologically male Scottish prisoners in English jails to demand to be placed in women’s prisons.
Scottish transgender women could also demand their new rights are mirrored in England, such as access to female-only spaces.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission has also warned that there could now be an impact on sex discrimination laws across the UK, including equal pay.
Tory MSP Rachael Hamilton said the Bill would ‘let criminal men exploit the system’ and put women in jeopardy in single-sex spaces.
JK Rowling has tweeted fury at the Scottish National Party’s self-ID law that makes it easier for people as young as 16 to change gender without seeing a doctor. The author previously shared a picture of herself wearing a t-shirt labelling Nicola Sturgeon a ‘destroyer of women’s rights’
The author and women’s rights campaigner, 57, retweeted an article which argued that the Labour Party would pay for supporting Nicola Sturgeon’s ‘trans crusade’
Nicola Sturgeon addresses Holyrood, where MSPs passed the Gender Recognition Reform Bill by 86 votes to 39 yesterday
What is Scotland’s Gender Recognition Reform Bill? Why is it so controversial?
What does the Bill do?
The Bill makes it easier for trans people to obtain a gender recognition certificate (GRC) by removing the requirement for a diagnosis of gender dysphoria. It also lowers the minimum age for applicants to 16 and drops the time required for an applicant to live in their acquired gender to three months, or six months for people aged 16 and 17 – although with a subsequent three-month reflection period.
How does this compare to UK-wide rules?
Current laws mean a person can apply for a gender recognition certificate only if they are aged 18 or over, have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria in the UK and have been living in their affirmed gender for at least two years. A person can apply even if they have not had any gender affirming surgery or treatments or do not plan to have any.
What do opponents say?
Opponents fear the Bill will impact the safety of women and single-sex spaces. Campaigners say there are insufficient safeguards to protect women and girls from predatory men, raising concerns about environments such as women’s prisons. There are also constitutional concerns, and fears of ‘gender tourism’ across the border.
How about supporters?
Those in favour of the Bill say a move to make trans people’s lives easier is long overdue. A group of LGBTQ+ groups recently issued a joint letter saying the Bill was a ‘historic opportunity to continue Scotland’s journey towards full social and legal equality’. They disagree that an expansion of trans people’s rights comes at the expense of women’s rights, saying the Bill will have little impact outside the trans community.
What issues need to be ironed out?
If the legislation becomes law, it is unclear whether any GRCs issued under the new Scottish rules would be recognised in England. Westminster has signalled it will not recognise them. GRCs allow someone to change their gender on legal documents such as their passport, which is issued by the UK rather than individual nations, or birth certificate, but it can also affect their entitlements to benefits and pensions. Practical difficulties are likely to arise in cross-border situations.
Could Westminster stop the legislation?
Scottish Secretary Alister Jack issued a statement yesterday after the Bill cleared Holyrood saying he was considering blocking it from becoming law. He said the Government would look at the ramifications for the Equality Act and could use a so-called Section 35 order to stop the Bill going for Royal Assent.
After Ms Sturgeon, Scotland’s First Minister, slashed the minimum period for adults to obtain a gender recognition certificate from two years, in theory someone could now rent a property north of the border for just three months and legally change their gender without a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria.
However, the UK Government is preparing to step in after Equalities Minister Kemi Badenoch wrote to Ms Sturgeon to warn her it was ‘not possible’ for the legislation to be ‘fully contained’ within Scotland.
Scottish Secretary Alister Jack issued a statement yesterday after the Bill cleared the Scottish Parliament at Holyrood saying he was considering blocking it from becoming law.
Ahead of yesterday’s vote, Mrs Badenoch said: ‘I am concerned about the impact [of] having divergent regimes in the different parts of the UK.
Rishi Sunak has said it is ‘completely reasonable’ to consider blocking new gender legislation in Scotland.
Visiting a homeless shelter in London, the Prime Minister said: ‘Lots of people have got concerns about this new Bill in Scotland, about the impact it will have on women’s and children’s safety.
‘So I think it is completely reasonable for the UK Government to have a look at it, understand what the consequences are for women and children’s safety in the rest of the UK, and then decide on what the appropriate course of action is.’
The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill was passed yesterday to both applause and jeers of ‘shame on you’ in Holyrood.
Westminster has signalled it will not accept Scottish gender recognition certificates south of the border.
The SNP’s Bill lets a person self-identify as transgender without medical checks, lowers the age limit to legally change gender from 18 to 16 and cuts the time a trans person must live in their acquired gender before they can switch.
The UK Government is so concerned about divergence in gender laws across the UK that it is set to overhaul how transgender people from other countries can legally change gender in England and Wales so Scotland does not claim to be discriminated against.
Whitehall sources said that to stop people travelling to Scotland to obtain a gender recognition certificate more easily before travelling back to England, they intend to update the entire list of approved countries to exclude some of those that allow self-identification.
After Mr Jack warned that he was considering blocking the Bill completely, Ms Sturgeon’s SNP administration said it would ‘vigorously contest’ any such move.
Mr Jack said: ‘We share the concerns that many people have regarding certain aspects of this Bill, and in particular the safety issues for women and children.
‘We will look closely at that, and also the ramifications for the 2010 Equality Act and other UK-wide legislation, in the coming weeks – up to and including a Section 35 order stopping the Bill going for royal assent if necessary.’
Ms Badenoch has raised concerns about the impact of the legislation.
A source close to her said she ‘didn’t believe the Scottish Government had considered the full impacts of this Bill – particularly on women and girls’.
The insider added: ‘She shares the strong concerns raised by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, the UN special rapporteur on violence against women and girls, and other civic groups and ministers regarding the impact this Bill will have on the functioning of the Equality Act, which is designed to protect all UK citizens.’
Under the Scotland Act, the UK Government can challenge devolved legislation if it feels it affects national security or ‘reserved matters’ – decisions taken by the UK Parliament even though they affect Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland or the regions of England.
Gender recognition is a devolved matter, but the Government is concerned about the impact of the Bill on equalities laws, which are the preserve of Westminster.
The Bill has also provoked fears that abusive men could take advantage of the new system to change gender, with critics, including JK Rowling, claiming that ‘all a man needs to “become a woman” is to say he’s one’.
Any action to block the legislation, which is expected to come into force next year, would be unprecedented – and would likely be subject to judicial review. Ministers have four weeks to decide whether to intervene.
One protester’s placard likened First Minister Ms Sturgeon to the Grinch, stealing the rights of women
A women’s rights protestor reacts after the Bill passes, by lifting up her skirt to reveal a ‘fake vagina’
A protester dressed as a suffragette outside Holyrood while the Bill was being debated
Such an attempt is likely to be used by Ms Sturgeon to push for Scottish independence. The Scottish Government vowed to challenge any attempt to stop the Bill – which had the backing of Scottish Labour – becoming law.
Rape victims ‘could have to use attacker’s new pronouns in court’
Rape victims will need to call their attackers by female pronouns in court if they change gender, MSPs have warned.
Concerns have been raised that a man who rapes a woman and then changes gender before a trial would then have to be referred to as ‘she’ or ‘her’.
Scottish Conservative community safety spokesman Russell Findlay, who has sought clarification on the issue from the Justice Secretary and senior Police Scotland officials, said: ‘It sounds absurd, ludicrous and unimaginable, but the answers that I got were worryingly vague and completely unconvincing.’
SNP MSP Michelle Thomson, who previously spoke about her experience of being raped as a teenager, failed in a bid to ensure that gender recognition certificate applications were paused if an applicant had been charged with sexual assault and would not be granted until the case was disposed of.
In the vote at the Scottish Parliament, 61 MSPs voted for and 61 against, only for the amendment to fall on the casting vote of Deputy Presiding Officer Liam McArthur.
Mrs Thomson told MSPs: ‘During stage 2, and again today, Russell Findlay pointed out that a woman could end up having to refer to her attacker as ‘she’.
‘Do members in the chamber understand how that could represent an opportunity for abusers to exert power and control over their victims?’
Social Justice Secretary Shona Robison said the Scottish Government had committed to regulations to amend the sex offender notification requirements so that people who are on the register would be required to notify police of the details if they applied for legal gender recognition.
She added: ‘That will mean additional information will be available to help to identify an individual and inform their subsequent management under the multi-agency public protection arrangements.
‘That will allow action to be taken either in relation to the application itself, if necessary, or as part of the broader police role in managing the registered sex offender population.’
Ahead of the votes, Miss Robison wrote to three MSPs, including Mrs Thomson, asking them to withdraw proposed changes to the legislation or risk delaying its passage through the Scottish Parliament.
She reportedly warned them that their amendments would put the Bill at ‘serious risk’ of being exceeding Holyrood’s authority, and said the changes risked being incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.
A Scottish Government spokesman said: ‘The Bill as passed is within legislative competence, and was backed by an overwhelming majority, with support from all parties.
‘Any attempt by the UK Government to undermine the democratic will of the Scottish Parliament will be vigorously contested by the Scottish Government.’
The legislation sets Scotland apart from the rest of the UK – where applicants for a gender recognition certificate must be 18 or over and have a diagnosis of gender dysphoria, the medical term for a person’s belief that there is a mismatch between their biological sex and their gender identity.
Obtaining a certificate allows an individual to change their gender on legal documents, such as their birth certificate, but it can also affect their entitlements to benefits and pensions.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission, which argued that the existing legal framework had the correct balance, called for clarity on the cross-border implications of the law.
It said: ‘We urge the Scottish and UK Governments to work together to minimise the risk of uncertainty around the potential cross-border implications we previously raised with them, as a matter of urgency now the Scottish Parliament has passed these reforms.’
The commission said it ‘might be difficult for trans people with Scottish GRCs to be certain of their legal status and rights’ and there could be challenges for employers and service providers in England and Wales.
The Bill, which passed by 86 votes to 39, has been one of the most controversial in Holyrood since devolution in 1999, and its debates have been hit by protests.
Opponents interrupted proceedings yesterday as Scotland’s Social Justice Secretary Shona Robison brought the debate to a close. There were cries of ‘shame on you’ from the public gallery after the final vote.
Ms Robison told MSPs: ‘Trans rights are not in competition with women’s rights, and as so often before, we can improve things for everyone when those discriminated against act as allies, not opponents.’
Ms Sturgeon’s Government has insisted the legislation will not affect the Equality Act, which allows for trans people to be excluded from single-sex spaces such as changing rooms.
But she has faced opposition from her own party and from women’s rights campaigners.
Nine SNP MSPs rebelled, including former minister Ash Regan who resigned over the issue. Two Labour MSPs voted against their party whip.
Tory MSP Ms Hamilton said the Bill had ‘shown this Parliament at its worst’.
She added: ‘In the rush to make the process a little easier for trans people, the Government is making it easier for criminal men to attack women. That’s the problem here.’
Ms Hamilton also said the gender Bill, which she claimed would be a ‘legacy issue for the First Minister’, would ‘let criminal men exploit the system’ and put women in jeopardy when in single-sex spaces.
Labour MP Rosie Duffield, a staunch defender of single-sex spaces, said women had now ‘lost the fundamental right to always expect protection’.
She added: ‘The women who will be most affected are those women in prison, women who are the victims of sexual violence and those already most vulnerable, powerless and at risk. It is the most basic job of all politicians to protect those people.’
Reem Alsalem, the UN’s special rapporteur on violence against women, told members of Holyrood’s equalities committee that the plans could see violent men exploit loopholes ‘to get into women’s spaces and have access to women’.