Kim Kardashian and Scott Disick named in lawsuit asking for more than $20 million over lottery

Kim Kardashian and Scott Disick sued for $40million over promoting luxury prizes on Instagram that were allegedly part of a fake lottery scam

  •  Kim Kardashian and Scott Disick are being sued over a 2020 giveaway he organized and she promoted, TMZ reported on Thursday
  •  The pair were both named in a lawsuit along with the company Curated for a giveaway which was allegedly a front to sell personal information to advertisers
  •  Winners of the original giveaway were supposed to receive $100,000 dollars, two first-class tickets to Los Angeles and a three-night stay in Beverly Hills
  •  Sources close to Curated told TMZ that the contest was legitimate, and they have documentation to prove it
  • ‘Today’s entertainment tycoons seem to only care about becoming richer and living an even more opulent lifestyle, while duping their fans and followers’
  • Other social media influences like Kylie Jenner and Christine Quinn helped promote the contest though they are not named in the suit
  • The plaintiffs are asking for more than $20 million a piece from Kardashian, Disick and Curated

Kim Kardashian and Scott Disick have been named in a $40 million lawsuit over promoting luxury prizes on social media back in 2020 that were allegedly part of a fake lottery scam.

The 41-year-old Skims founder and the Talentless creator, 39, were both named in a lawsuit along with the Australian company Curated for a giveaway which was allegedly a front to sell personal information to advertisers, TMZ reported on Thursday. 

Winners of the original giveaway were supposed to receive $100,000 dollars, two first-class tickets to Los Angeles and a three-night stay in Beverly Hills. 

Lawsuit: Kim Kardashian and Scott Disick are being sued over a 2020 lottery giveaway he allegedly organized and she promoted, TMZ reported on Thursday

The publication reported that once the winners were announced, their Instagram accounts quickly changed from public to private.    

Sources close to Curated, which ran the contest with the help of myriad celebrities on social media, told TMZ that the contest was legitimate and they have documentation to prove it. 

In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs claim that contestants have been ‘invaded by hundreds of advertisers, some of which are soliciting the Plaintiffs with potentially offensive and unwanted content.’ 

Later on in the suit, the integrity of Kardashian, Disick and other entertainment heavyweights are called in to question.  

Named in the suit: The 41-year-old Skims founder and the Talentless creator, 39, were both named in a lawsuit along with the Australian company Curated for a giveaway which was allegedly a front to sell personal information to advertisers

Named in the suit: The 41-year-old Skims founder and the Talentless creator, 39, were both named in a lawsuit along with the Australian company Curated for a giveaway which was allegedly a front to sell personal information to advertisers

Huge prize package: Winners of the original giveaway were supposed to receive $100,000 dollars, two first-class tickets to Los Angeles and a three-night stay in Beverly Hills

Huge prize package: Winners of the original giveaway were supposed to receive $100,000 dollars, two first-class tickets to Los Angeles and a three-night stay in Beverly Hills

About personal wealth: 'Just a short 20 years ago, Oprah was giving away cars and cash,' it reads. 'But today's entertainment tycoons seem to only care about becoming richer and living an even more opulent lifestyle, while duping their fans and followers'

About personal wealth: ‘Just a short 20 years ago, Oprah was giving away cars and cash,’ it reads. ‘But today’s entertainment tycoons seem to only care about becoming richer and living an even more opulent lifestyle, while duping their fans and followers’

‘Just a short 20 years ago, Oprah was giving away cars and cash,’ it reads. ‘But today’s entertainment tycoons seem to only care about becoming richer and living an even more opulent lifestyle, while duping their fans and followers.’ 

The lawsuit also alleges that other celebrities used their respective Instagram accounts to promote the contest as well. 

Under the frequently asked questions section of the website, there is one which read, ‘How is the winner selected?’ 

Curated Businesses responds, ‘We engage the services of a third party facilitator to conduct a random draw of all eligible entrants.

‘They are Australian government approved and compliant. As required by Australian law, we also engage the services of fully qualified independent scrutineer to oversee the random draw.’

Giving power to a third party: Curated Businesses responds, 'We engage the services of a third-party facilitator to conduct a random draw of all eligible entrants'

Giving power to a third party: Curated Businesses responds, ‘We engage the services of a third-party facilitator to conduct a random draw of all eligible entrants’

Millions: The plaintiffs are asking for more than $20 million a piece from Kardashian, Disick and Curated (pictured August 2017)

Millions: The plaintiffs are asking for more than $20 million a piece from Kardashian, Disick and Curated (pictured August 2017)

It points out Kendall Jenner, Kris Jenner, Kylie Jenner, Khloé Kardashian, Kourtney Kardashian, Sofia Richie, Gretchen Christine Rossi and Selling Sunset star Christine Quinn all promoted the giveaway as well. 

Despite the number of other celebrities mentioned in the suit, only Kim and Disick are named as defendants currently. 

The plaintiffs are asking for more than $20 million a piece from Kardashian, Disick and Curated. 

This year has been fraught with legal drama for Kim with her brother Rob’s ex Blac Chyna suing the Kardashian family for defamation and her skincare brand SKKN getting hit with a trademark lawsuit by a Brooklyn-based small business owner.   

***
Read more at DailyMail.co.uk