Nasa could use paint to defend our planet from a doomsday asteroid that may wipe out life on Earth, according to one of the agency’s top engineers.
It was recently revealed that the rogue space rock 101955 Bennu, which is larger than the Empire State Building, could collide with our planet in 2135.
Dr Michael Moreau, a scientist for Nasa’s OSIRIS-REx mission, which is sending a probe to study the rock, said a spacecraft could be sent to paint Bennu to divert it.
Changing the colour of part of the asteroid would expose it to solar radiation, which could heat the object up enough to change its orbit and miss our planet.
Nasa could use paint to defend our planet from a doomsday asteroid that may wipe out life on Earth. It was recently revealed that the rogue space rock 101955 Bennu (right), which is larger than the Empire State Building, could collide with our planet in 2135
Speaking to Gizmodo, Dr Moreau said: ‘Even just painting the surface a different colour on one half would change the thermal properties and change its orbit.’
Bennu is a potentially hazardous object discovered in 1999 that measures a staggering 492 metres (1,614 feet) in diameter according to Nasa estimates.
There is a small chance, around 1 in 2,700 odds, that Bennu will strike Earth in 2135 based on its current orbital path, and some scientists have suggested hitting it with a nuclear weapon to avoid a devastating collision.
According to Dr Moreau, a mission to paint the asteroid presents a far simpler solution should Bennu pose a threat to our planet in 120 years’ time.
The sun constantly pelts objects in the solar system with tiny particles of solar radiation, each exerting a small amount of pressure.
Because Bennu is small compared to a planet or star, weighing around 13 times the mass of the Great Pyramid of Giza, these particles can gradually alter its orbit.
Dr Michael Moreau, a scientist for Nasa’s OSIRIS-REx mission, which is sending a probe (artist’s impression) to study the rock, said a spacecraft could be sent to paint Bennu to divert it. Changing the colour of part of the asteroid would expose it to solar radiation
IS EARTH DUE FOR A MAJOR ASTEROID IMPACT?
Researchers have discovered most of the asteroids that are about a kilometers in size, but are now on the hunt for those that are about 140m – as they could cause catastrophic damage.
Although nobody knows when the next big impact will occur, scientists have found themselves under pressure to predict – and intercept – its arrival.
Artist’s impression pictured
‘Sooner or later we will get… a minor or major impact,’ said Rolf Densing, who heads the European Space Operations Centre (ESOC) in Darmstadt, ahead of International Asteroid Day on Friday.
It may not happen in our lifetime, he said, but ‘the risk that Earth will get hit in a devastating event one day is very high.’
For now, there is little we can do.
And yet, the first-ever mission to crash a probe into a small space rock to alter its trajectory suffered a major setback when European ministers declined in December to fund part of the project.
‘We are not ready to defend ourselves’ against an Earth-bound object, said Densing. ‘We have no active planetary defense measures.’
Source: AFP
If scientists could make part of the rock more susceptible to solar radiation by painting it a dark colour, that may alter its path enough to avoid hitting Earth.
Scientists first need to better study its composition and orbit around the sun to determine the best course of action.
Nasa’s OSIRIS-REx spacecraft will study Bennu further when it reaches the rock in December, with the probe set to return to Earth with samples in 2023.
Dr Moreau manages the craft’s Flight Dynamics division.
A number of proposals on how scientists may stop Bennu have been put forward since its discovery in 1999, but a study published last week suggested it may be impossible to stop the space rock.
If scientists could make part of Bennu more susceptible to solar radiation by painting it a dark colour, that may alter its path enough to avoid hitting Earth (stock)
Scientists revealed that even the most advanced technology would prove ‘inadequate’ for deflecting the huge asteroid.
While it could be possible to divert a near-Earth object (NEO) by slamming into it with a so-called impactor, experts say a nuclear explosion may be the best bet when time is running out.
In a new paper, scientists from Nasa and the National Nuclear Security Administration laid out a plan for the Hypervelocity Asteroid Mitigation Mission for Emergency Response (HAMMER).
The 8.8-ton HAMMER spacecraft could be used to steer itself directly into a small asteroid, or blow the space rock up using a nuclear device, according to BuzzFeed.
The team devised a proposal around a potential impact with the 1,600-foot-wide asteroid Bennu.
Nasa’s OSIRIS-REx spacecraft (green line shows orbit) will study Bennu (blue) further when it reaches the rock in December, with the probe set to return to Earth with samples in 2023
‘The two realistic responses considered are the use of a spacecraft functioning as either a kinetic impactor or a nuclear explosive carrier to deflect the approaching NEO,’ the authors wrote in the study, published to the journal Acta Astronautica.
But, there are several factors that would determine the best approach.
The asteroid’s size and mass must be taken into consideration, along with the amount of time available before it hits Earth.
Plus, there are always ‘various uncertainties.’
‘Whenever practical, the kinetic impactor is the preferred approach, but various factors, such as large uncertainties or short available response time, reduce the kinetic impactor’s suitability and, ultimately, eliminate its sufficiency,’ the authors wrote.
By driving multiple spacecraft into the asteroid’s path, it could be possible to slow the object down and throw it off course to avoid a collision with Earth.
If the conditions aren’t right to use the kinetic impactor, however, nuking it might be the only option.
‘If the asteroid is small enough, and we detect it early enough, we can do it with the impactor,’ physicist David Dearborn of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory told BuzzFeed News.
‘The impactor is not as flexible as the nuclear option when we really want to change the speed of the body in a hurry.’