Net neutrality repeal could make porn more expensive

Free internet pornography could be no more due to the Federal Communication Commission’s decision on Thursday to kill net neutrality rules that provide equal access to online content.

The vote will likely reshape the multi-billion pornography industry in the coming years – as providers will have to pay more to allow viewers to keep watching for free, with little to no financial gain. 

This will impact consumers – a lot, as pornography is currently the number one online industry in the world. 

In 2016 Pornhub viewers alone watched more than 91 billion videos, and the website got an average of 44,000 visits per hour. 

Free internet pornography could be no more due to the Federal Communication Commission’s decision Thursday to kill net neutrality rules that provide equal access to online content (STOCK IMAGE) 

The vote will likely reshape the multi-billion pornography industry in the coming years - as providers will have to pay more to allow viewers to keep watching for free. Pictured are demonstrators chanting and holding up signs during a net neutrality protest on Thursday, December 7

The vote will likely reshape the multi-billion pornography industry in the coming years – as providers will have to pay more to allow viewers to keep watching for free. Pictured are demonstrators chanting and holding up signs during a net neutrality protest on Thursday, December 7

Thursday’s vote means that internet service providers will be able to control what users can access based on the amount they are paying. 

Providers will be able to charge a range of prices based on the type of content a website puts out. 

This means that internet porn that was once free, or cheap, could get much more expensive. It would impact both people who want to watch porn and the groups uploading the pornographic content.  

Trump’s appointed FCC chairman Ajit Pai supported the repeal, and said it will keep the government from ‘micromanaging the internet.

‘We are helping consumers and promoting competition. Broadband providers will have more incentive to build networks, especially to underserved areas.  

Pornhub has been one of the many websites to speak out against the FCC’s repeal of net neutrality. 

Trump’s appointed FCC chairman Ajit Pai (pictured) supported the repeal, and said it will keep the government from ‘micromanaging the internet

The company joined a protest organized by Fight for the Future, freepress, and Demand Progress in July – calling the FCC’s actions a ‘threat to a free and open internet.’  

‘Without [net neutrality], the cable and wireless companies that control internet access will have unfair power to pick winners and losers in the market,’ Pornhub’s vice president Corey Price told Motherboard.  

‘No one in the porn industry ever yells ‘slower, slower, slower.” We’re much more accustomed to “faster, faster, faster.” Here at Pornhub we want to keep it that way.’ 

And Alex Hawkins, a spokesperson for the porn website xHamster, told Life Site News that ending net neutrality will align the US market with more conservative viewpoints on pornography and sexuality. 

He thinks the repeal will favor a more ‘heteronormative version of sexuality.’ 

It is unlikely that the repeal will cause porn to disappear entirely, but it will probably cost more. 

But that could be good for some lawmakers – as several states, such as South Dakota, Virginia and Utah, have declared porn a public health crisis.   

Additionally, many republican lawmakers think ‘net neutrality’ is improperly named, and say it’s unnecessary government regulation.  

WHAT IS ‘NET NEUTRALITY’? 

Net neutrality is the principle that internet providers treat all web traffic equally, and it’s pretty much how the internet has worked since its creation. But regulators, consumer advocates and internet companies were concerned about what broadband companies could do with their power as the pathway to the internet – blocking or slowing down apps that rival their own services, for example. 

WHAT DID THE GOVERNMENT DO ABOUT IT?

The FCC in 2015 approved rules, on a party-line vote, that made sure cable and phone companies don’t manipulate traffic. With them in place, a provider such as Comcast can’t charge Netflix for a faster path to its customers, or block it or slow it down.

The net neutrality rules gave the FCC power to go after companies for business practices that weren’t explicitly banned as well. For example, the Obama FCC said that ‘zero rating’ practices by AT&T violated net neutrality. The telecom giant exempted its own video app from cellphone data caps, which would save some consumers money, and said video rivals could pay for the same treatment. Pai’s FCC spiked the effort to go after AT&T, even before it began rolling out a plan to undo the net neutrality rules entirely.

A federal appeals court upheld the rules in 2016 after broadband providers sued.

WHAT DO TELECOM COMPANIES WANT?

Big telecom companies hate the stricter regulation that comes with the net neutrality rules and have fought them fiercely in court. They say the regulations can undermine investment in broadband and introduced uncertainty about what were acceptable business practices. There were concerns about potential price regulation, even though the FCC had said it won’t set prices for consumer internet service. 

WHAT DOES SILICON VALLEY WANT?

Internet companies such as Google have strongly backed net neutrality, but many tech firms have been more muted in their activism this year. Netflix, which had been vocal in support of the rules in 2015, said in January that weaker net neutrality wouldn’t hurt it because it’s now too popular with users for broadband providers to interfere. 



Read more at DailyMail.co.uk