Pets: Dogs get humans in a way their relatives like wolves don’t, study finds

Dog puppies understand humans in a way that their relatives like wolves just don’t thanks to undergoing some 14,000 years of domestication, a study has concluded.

Researchers from Duke University tested both dog and wolf puppies in a series of tests that involved locating hidden food by picking up on human clues.

They found that dog puppies have similar social cognition abilities as human babies — and are able, for example, to instinctively recognise pointing as communication.

This superficially simple understanding is, in fact, rare in the animal kingdom. Not only did the wolf pups in the study lack it, but so do chimps, our closest relatives.

Dogs, the team said, acquired this skill after generations of hanging around with us — allowing them, in certain situations, to work out what we are trying to tell them.

Dog puppies understand humans in a way that their relatives like wolves just don’t thanks to undergoing some 14,000 years of domestication, a study has concluded

‘This study really solidifies the evidence that the social genius of dogs is a product of domestication,’ said paper author and evolutionary anthropologist Brian Hare of North Carolina’s Duke University.

This ability, he added, is what allow dogs to be such amazing service animals.

‘It is something they are really born prepared to do.’

In their study, the researchers performed tests with 44 dog and 37 wolf puppies between the ages of 5 and 18 weeks old. 

Prior to the study, each of the wolf puppies was genetically tested to ensure they were true wolves — and not wolf–dog hybrids — and were raised with round-the-clock human interaction, including hand feeding and sleeping with their caretakers.

In contrast, the dog puppies were raised with their mothers and were given less human contact than the wolves.

The researchers performed a number of trials on the puppies, many of which involved trying to find a treat that was hidden in one of two bowls.

The team gave each puppy a clue to help them find the food — such as, for example, pointing and staring at where the food was hidden or, in a gesture that the creatures had never seen before, marking the correct bowl with a small wooden block.

Researchers from Duke University tested both dog and wolf puppies in a series of tests that involved locating hidden food by picking up on human clues. Pictured: a grey wolf puppy

Researchers from Duke University tested both dog and wolf puppies in a series of tests that involved locating hidden food by picking up on human clues. Pictured: a grey wolf puppy

The team found that — even though they had been given no specific training — dog puppies as young as eight weeks old were twice as likely as human-socialised wolf pups to successfully find the hidden treat based on the clues.

Furthermore, many of the dogs were able to ‘get’ the hints given to them by the humans on their first go, with no prior experience. 

Specifically, 17 of the 31 dog puppies went to the right bowl each time — whereas none of the 26 wold pups did better than a second guess.

According to the team, their control tests indicated that the dogs’ success was also not simply a result of the puppies sniffing out the location of the food.

The researchers said that — much like human infants — dog puppies instinctively understand that, when a person points, they're trying to tell them something, whereas wolf puppies do not have this response. 'We think it indicates a really important element of social cognition, which is that others are trying to help you,' said Professor Hare. Pictured: a puppy pays attention

The researchers said that — much like human infants — dog puppies instinctively understand that, when a person points, they’re trying to tell them something, whereas wolf puppies do not have this response. ‘We think it indicates a really important element of social cognition, which is that others are trying to help you,’ said Professor Hare. Pictured: a puppy pays attention

According to paper author and cooperative behaviour researcher Hannah Salomons, also of Duke University, the findings are not a reflection of which species is ‘smarter’ — in fact, both species’ puppies were found equally adept other cognitive tests.

Instead, the difference seen in the ‘hidden food with clues’ tests is a reflection of their respective people-reading skills, she explained.

‘There’s lots of different ways to be smart. Animals evolve cognition in a way that will help them succeed in whatever environment they’re living in,’ Ms Salomons said.

Other tests conducted by the team revealed that dog puppies are 30 times more likely than their wolf counterparts to approach complete strangers. 

‘With the dog puppies we worked with, if you walk into their enclosure they gather around and want to climb on you and lick your face, whereas most of the wolf puppies run to the corner and hide,’ Ms Salomons added.

Furthermore, she noted, dog puppies were more likely than the wolf pups to turn to people for help when they were presented with a problem — food trapped inside a sealed container — that they were unable to solve on their own.

The researchers said that — much like human infants — dog puppies instinctively understand that, when a person points, they’re trying to tell them something, whereas wolf puppies do not have this response. 

‘We think it indicates a really important element of social cognition, which is that others are trying to help you,’ said Professor Hare.

‘Dogs are born with this innate ability to understand that we’re communicating with them and we’re trying to cooperate with them,’ Ms Salomons added.

The full findings of the study were published in the journal Current Biology.

DOGS FIRST BECAME DOMESTICATED ABOUT 20,000 to 40,000 YEARS AGO

A genetic analysis of the world’s oldest known dog remains revealed that dogs were domesticated in a single event by humans living in Eurasia, around 20,000 to 40,000 years ago.

Dr Krishna Veeramah, an assistant professor in evolution at Stony Brook University, told MailOnline: ‘The process of dog domestication would have been a very complex process, involving a number of generations where signature dog traits evolved gradually.

‘The current hypothesis is that the domestication of dogs likely arose passively, with a population of wolves somewhere in the world living on the outskirts of hunter-gatherer camps feeding off refuse created by the humans.

‘Those wolves that were tamer and less aggressive would have been more successful at this, and while the humans did not initially gain any kind of benefit from this process, over time they would have developed some kind of symbiotic [mutually beneficial] relationship with these animals, eventually evolving into the dogs we see today.’

Read more at DailyMail.co.uk