Surgeons lacked caution in their use of controversial vaginal mesh implants that have left thousands of women worldwide suicidal, unable to have sex and in agonising pain, a senior doctor has admitted.
Jenny King, director of the Urogynaecological Society of Australasia, said those given the ‘magic’ procedure had been ‘seriously let down’ by the life-changing complications caused by the brittle devices.
She made the revelation at an Australian court case of 700 mesh-suffering women against manufacturer Johnson & Johnson. Battling tears, two of those bravely spoke out about how their lives have been destroyed since having the surgery.
Pressure is also mounting for a UK ban of the ‘gold-standard’ treatment for urinary stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. At least 800 British women are suing the NHS and manufacturers after allegedly suffering crippling pain.
Dr King told the inquiry, which was launched in July, there had been a lack of caution around the use of vaginal mesh, The Guardian reports.
She said surgeons often believed the scandal-hit devices, which experts warn the dangers could be akin to thalidomide, were a ‘magic’ cure for incontinence.
Tireless fights by campaigners have helped gather momentum for a public inquiry into the implants. Senior doctors have said the scandal, which has seen at least 800 women sue the NHS and manufactures in the UK, is akin to thalidomide
The revelation was made at an Australian court case of 700 mesh-suffering women against manufacturer Johnson & Johnson. Battling tears, two of those bravely spoke out about how their lives have been destroyed since having the surgery, including Joanne Maninon (pictured)
But she belittled ongoing campaigns launched by women to ban the devices which can easily erode inside women and leave them in a lifetime of pain, describing such attempts as ‘hysterical’.
What did Dr King say?
Dr King, who also denied that surgeons were offered incentives to carry out the procedures, said: ‘The impacts that these have had on these women – we have seriously let them down.
‘But what phases me about this is the suggestion that the solution is to ban vaginal mesh products so that other people don’t suffer. I don’t want to defend all of my colleagues, but we’re not really callous. We don’t like it when we can’t fix everyone, we’re really bad at that.’
Joanna Maninon (middle right), who had her surgery five years ago, told the inquiry that she was advised it would take 10 days to recover – but she still suffers to this day. Gai Thompson (middle left), who had her surgery in 2008, spoke of similar problems
Revealing their horror at the inquiry, women described the pain from the mesh as being like ‘cut open and set alight’. Others have previously said it feels like cheese wire scraping against their insides.
Joanna Maninon, who had her surgery five years ago, told the inquiry that she was advised it would take 10 days to recover – but she still suffers to this day.
She said: ‘I can’t sit upright on a chair for longer than 15 minutes at a time due to the searing, burning pain that travels across my lower abdomen and into my pelvis.
‘I describe my pain as being cut open and set alight. A deep burning, searing ache that intensifies with movement.’
Gai Thompson, who had her surgery in 2008, spoke of similar problems.
What did Johnson & Johnson say?
But Johnson & Johnson denied any wrongdoing on its behalf – despite allegations of some surgeons being given six-figure sums and expensive trips abroad to push the implants. Lamborghinis and ski-trips were other incentives.
Gavin Fox-Smith, managing director of the pharmaceutical firm’s Australia and New Zealand division, offered an apology to those women who had not ‘experienced a successful outcome from their treatment’.
He said: ‘We believe the evidence will show we have acted ethically and responsibly in the research, development, and supply of the products that are the subject of the proceedings.’
Other revelations from the inquiry
On the first day of the inquiry in July, a French doctor, who was part of Johnson & Johnson’s transvaginal mesh evaluation team, said he wouldn’t want his wife to undergo the procedure.
Dr Bernard Jacquetin made the revelation in an email, which also said he doesn’t think he is the only one concerned by the debilitating effects of mesh. His comments shocked the public gallery.
While another doctor, who was unnamed, suggested that patients left in too much agony to have sex should instead try anal sex, it emerged last month.
What does the evidence say?
Months back, MailOnline reported on a host of evidence that clearly shows adverse effects of the surgery to strike up to 40 per cent of women. Others suggest it could be as high as 75 per cent.
Such studies encouraged doctors to suspend the procedures in three US states, with the device being considered high-risk across America for nearly a decade, as officials accept that up to 40 per cent of women may experience injury.
Senior doctors have already called for a public inquiry into its use in Britain, saying it could be akin to the thalidomide scandal. The procedure, used to treat childbirth problems, has seen more than 800 women sue the NHS and device manufacturers.
Unwilling to accept higher rates
But English health officials have yet to acknowledge the risks of the brittle implants which can break into tiny fragments and cause nerve damage. Currently, the NHS and MHRA state only 1 to 3 per cent will experience complications such as pain.
Its usage has been suspended in Scotland since 2014 pending a safety review, but hundreds of women are still believed to be having the surgery. And just last month the English MHRA insisted the mesh was safe.
Medics worry the most worrying complication is the need for the removal of the implant – which takes only 30 minutes to place inside a woman and then embeds into their vaginal wall and can prove complex to remove.