You are what you think you eat, new research reveals.
Believing you had a small breakfast makes people feel significantly hungrier just two hours later, a study found.
They also consume more food at lunch and take in more calories throughout the day, the research adds.
The memory of a small meal, as opposed to producing higher amounts of ‘hunger hormones’, is behind the results, according to the researchers.
Lead author Dr Steven Brown from Sheffield Hallam University, said: ‘We were able to measure participants’ consumption throughout the rest of the day and found that total intake was lower when participants believed that they had eaten a larger breakfast.’
Believing you had a small breakfast makes people feel significantly hungrier two hours later
How the research was carried out
The researchers analysed 26 adults.
Over two visits, the study’s participants were told they were eating either a two-egg or four-egg omelette.
All of the omelettes actually contained three eggs.
Blood samples were taken from the participants to determine their levels of the ‘hunger hormone’ ghrelin.
Thinking you eat less makes you hungrier
Results reveal that when people believe they are eating less they report being significantly hungrier two hours later.
They also consume significantly more food at lunch, as well as taking in more calories throughout the day.
The findings were presented at the British Psychological Society’s Division of Health Psychology conference in Cardiff.
Food expectations influence hunger and calorie intake
Dr Brown said: ‘Previous studies have shown that a person’s expectations can have an impact on their subsequent feelings of hunger and fullness and, to a degree, their later calorie consumption.
‘Our work builds on this with the introduction of solid food and measured people’s subsequent consumption four hours later, a period of time more indicative of the gap between breakfast and lunch.
‘We were also able to measure participants’ consumption throughout the rest of the day and found that total intake was lower when participants believed that they had eaten a larger breakfast.
‘Having analysed levels of ghrelin, our data also suggest that changes in reported hunger and the differences in later consumption are not due to a differences in participants’ physical response to the food.
‘Therefore, memory for prior consumption, as opposed to physiological factors, may be a better target for investigating why expectations for a meal have an effect on subsequent feelings of hunger and calorie intake.’