Benjamin Mendy cleared of six counts of rape and sex assault

Benjamin Mendy will face a retrial on one count of rape and another of attempted rape after a jury failed to reach verdicts – as he was cleared of seven other charges. 

The Man City star, 28, sitting in the dock at Chester Crown Court, covered his face with both hands, gently rocking back and forth, as the jury foreman, delivering the verdicts in a hushed courtroom, repeated ‘not guilty’ to six counts of rape and one count of sexual assault, relating to four young women or teenagers. 

However, the  jury were unable to reach verdicts on another count of rape and one attempted sexual assault – alleged to have taken place at Mendy’s £4.7million mansion in Prestbury, Cheshire.

He will now face a three-week trial on the two outstanding counts starting on June 26.

The unanimous verdicts were delivered today by the seven men and four women on the jury, one juror having been discharged earlier for medical reasons.   

Jenny Wiltshire, Head of Serious and General Crime at Hickman & Rose, said Mendy was ‘delighted’ to have been cleared of sex attacks on four women and ‘looks forward’ to clearing his name at a re-trial over two other allegations and ‘rebuilding his life’.  

She said: ‘My client Benjamin Mendy would like to thank the members of the jury for their dedication and commitment.

‘He also thanks everyone who supported him, and particularly the witnesses who gave evidence on his behalf in the glare of such intense publicity. He looks forward to clearing his name in relation to the other two charges so he can start rebuilding his life.’ 

A spokesman for Man City said: ‘We note the verdict from Chester Crown Court today, where a jury has found Benjamin Mendy not guilty of seven charges. The jury is hung on two charges and the trial is now over.

‘Given there are open matters related to this case, the Club is not in a position to comment further at this time.’  

Judge Steven Everett thanked jurors and excused them from jury service for seven years.

He said: ‘The prosecution has made a decision. We have made a decision today, which is to proceed on these counts in two separate trials and we seek today a provisional case management.’

Louis Saha Matturie, 41, Mendy’s co-accused and alleged ‘fixer’ was found not guilty by the jury of three counts of rape relating to two teenagers. Jurors also failed to reach verdicts on three counts of rape and three counts of sexual assault against him by five other women. 

The trial, due to start last January, lasted nearly six months, with the jury of eight men and four women hearing a string of alleged sex crimes against 13 original complainants.

The allegations and trial had been ‘absolute hell’ for Mendy, the court heard, and his life in football ‘is over’ as he would ‘never escape’ the accusations.

Mendy had been accused of being a ‘predator’ who turned the pursuit of women for sex into a game, his trial heard, drinking champagne in VIP areas of Manchester nightclubs before inviting young women into ‘toxic and dangerous’ situations at ‘after-parties’ at his £4.7 million Cheshire mansion in Mottram St Andrew, near Prestbury.

Friend and ‘fixer’ Louis Saha Matturie, 46, – seen outside court yesterday 

Timothy Cray KC, prosecuting, said Matturie, known as Saha, was Mendy’s ‘friend and fixer’ and used a £2,000-a month rented flat in Salford to hold parties. Mendy also paid him £17,000 for his services over the course of a year. 

Mr Cray said that Saha Matturie’s job was to find young women for Mendy and ‘to create the situations where they could be raped and abused.’ 

He told the jury: ‘The acts that the defendants did together show callous indifference to the women they went after. In their minds, and this could not be clearer, the stream of women they brought to their homes existed purely to be pursued for sex.’ 

But jurors were also told by defence lawyers that while the trial, involving money, sex and celebrity, had ‘all the makings of a good drama’, it came with a significant ‘plot twist’ – the accused were innocent. 

Lockdown-busting parties were held both at Mendy’s home and an apartment he rented on Chapel Street near Manchester city centre, the court heard.

He was first arrested in November 2020 after the alleged triple rape of the 24-year-old woman at his home the previous month.

Mendy was released under investigation before he was later accused of sexually assaulting another woman, aged 24, two months later, and while on police bail for that offence, was later accused of the rape of three other women, one aged 17 – all offences of which he was cleared.

Mendy was suspended by his club in August 2021, after he was charged with rape.

Mr Cray said the footballer, a man with money, power and privilege, thought about what was ‘in his pants’ and that was why he got it ‘terribly wrong’ in believing women were consenting to sex.

Lisa Wilding KC, representing Matturie, told jurors it was ‘chillingly easy’ to make false allegations and suggested all the women involved, all in some way connected through friendships, social media connections or by attending parties.  

Mendy’s lawyer said the trial had been ‘absolute hell’ for the footballer. He is pictured arriving at Chester Crown Court earlier in the case

Jurors were told not to take a ‘moralistic’ approach to the defendants’ sexual lifestyles, and the approach of Cheshire Police was also criticised in court.

Eleanor Laws KC, defending Mendy, suggested ‘regret’ at having ‘quick, animalistic sex’ is not the same as being raped.

Ms Wilding said the sexual habits and lifestyles of the defendants did not make them rapists, and that women over the last 40 years had earned sexual equality, however that is expressed.

The lawyer told the jury they had been told ‘layer upon layer of lies’, by the woman claiming to have been subject to sex attacks. There was ‘a tangled spider’s web of contact, collusion and contamination’ among the 12 complainants, she said. 

Ms Wilding said complainants in this case had actively pursued sex with men they hardly knew and that is their right – but it can come with hurt and embarrassment after

Both defence barristers pointed out that the evidence of one complainant, a 19 year old who claimed she had been raped by both Mendy and Matturie, was proved unreliable when a sex tape was revealed, which inevitably helped weaken the rest of the case against the two men.

The mobile phone footage was shot by Matturie showing him and the teenager having oral and conventional sex at the apartment in Chapel Street which the complainant had claimed was rape.

The revelation of the tape half way through the trial by Matturie’s defence team led to one charge of rape against Mendy and two charges of rape plus one of sexual assault against Matturie being dropped.

Mendy’s multi-million pound mansion in Cheshire 

Ms Wilding said: ‘For 56 minutes she sat there and gave a lying account. I suggest to you that the witness’s ability to lie and deceive and to embellish was quite something.

‘We have travelled a long way from the dark ages of ”she was wearing a short skirt so she was asking for it”. Hopefully we have left that a long way behind.

‘Young women are sexually liberated, independent and they use their bodies as they wish. They carry the banner of sexual freedom but that also comes with responsibility.

‘It does not mean that what they do and how they choose to do it cannot be looked at in the context of this case.’    

Mendy had denied seven counts of rape, one count of attempted rape and one count of sexual assault against six young women, between October 2018 and August 2021.

Matturie, of Eccles, Salford, denied six counts of rape and three counts of sexual assault relating to seven young women, between July 2012 and August 2021.