Dozens of Tommy Robinson supporters gather outside the Old Bailey

English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson arrives for his sentencing at the Old Bailey in London this morning

Dozens of Tommy Robinson supporters gathered at the Old Bailey today as he arrived to be sentenced for contempt of court over a video he broadcast online which featured defendants in a criminal trial.

The 36-year-old former English Defence League (EDL) founder, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, was found to have committed contempt of court following a two-day hearing at the Old Bailey last week.

His supporters, including five women on mobility scooters, waved Union flags outside the court in London today amid a heavy police presence as people chanted his name and ‘We want Tommy out’. 

Robinson walked through a throng of people to get to the court this morning, wearing paint-splattered ripped blue jeans, a black T-shirt – which said ‘convicted of journalism’ on the front and ‘Britain = North Korea’ on the back – and a badge reading ‘I support soldiers A-Z’.

But Robinson, who attended media law training in June 2017, was ten minutes late for the start of his hearing after speaking to his supporters outside the court, with the judge telling him: ‘It’s not a very good start.’

Robinson arrived amid chaotic scenes, with scores of supporters blocking nearby roads as they went to greet him. He also was mobbed by fans as he made his way towards the court building with his legal team.

At the start of the hearing, his barrister Richard Furlong apologised on his client’s behalf for his late arrival.

He told Dame Victoria Sharp and Mr Justice Warby that Robinson, who is from Luton, Bedfordshire, had arrived at a nearby train station 20 minutes before the hearing was due to begin, but was delayed by ‘a number of people outside who are here to support him’. 

Dame Victoria replied: ‘Well, it’s not a very good start, is it?’. Aidan Eardley, representing the Attorney General, told the court about previous punishments handed out in cases of contempt. 

Robinson arrives next to a City of London security guard for his sentencing for contempt of court at the Old Bailey today

Robinson arrives next to a City of London security guard for his sentencing for contempt of court at the Old Bailey today

Robinson was ten minutes late for the start of his hearing after speaking to his supporters outside the court in London today

Robinson arrives at the Old Bailey

Robinson was ten minutes late for the start of his hearing after speaking to his supporters outside the court in London today

Robinson arrived at the court today amid a heavy police presence as people chanted his name and 'We want Tommy out'

Robinson arrived at the court today amid a heavy police presence as people chanted his name and ‘We want Tommy out’

Supporters of English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson at the Old Bailey in London today ahead of his sentencing

Supporters of English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson at the Old Bailey in London today ahead of his sentencing

One supporter of Robinson carried a sign today reading: 'The Nazis blindly followed orders. Will the police do the same'

One supporter of Robinson carried a sign today reading: ‘The Nazis blindly followed orders. Will the police do the same’

He said that cases of ‘strict liability’ contempt have previously been dealt with by way of a fine, rather than a jail term, but he said these were ‘typically’ cases involving media organisations rather than individuals.

In mitigation, Mr Furlong asked the court to consider any ‘actual harm caused’ by Robinson’s actions.

Why Tommy Robinson was found in contempt of court and what it means 

Why was Tommy Robinson jailed in May 2018?

Robinson was jailed after a judge at Leeds Crown Court found him in contempt of court in May.

The judge determined that Robinson’s broadcasting of a video online breached a court order which postponed any reporting of a trial until the conclusion of another, linked, trial.

He was jailed within five hours of the video being filmed and posted online.

He was previously given a suspended sentence for contempt at Canterbury Crown Court, when a judge told him it was likely he would go to prison if he engaged in similar conduct in future.

What is contempt of court?

Contempt of court law exists to ensure the fairness and integrity of criminal trials.

Where a judge believes there is a ‘substantial risk of serious prejudice’ to a defendant, an order may be made under the Contempt of Court Act which postpones the reporting of a trial until its conclusion.

When making such an order, a judge has to balance the interests of justice in a fair trial taking place with other interests – including free speech and open justice.

In most cases where someone is alleged to be in contempt of court, the matter will be referred to the Attorney General.

He said: ‘Notwithstanding the seriousness of what has been found to be proven against him, in terms of actual harm to the trial of the criminal defendants in Leeds there is no suggestion that the criminal defendants in Leeds did not have a fair trial, notwithstanding his conduct outside the court’.

Mr Furlong asked the court to consider the delay in bringing the current proceedings, saying: ‘There has been an additional 14 months since the incident on May 25 (2018).’ 

He added: ‘There have been no further instances of contempt.’

Outside, a man with a microphone addressed the crowd, saying: ‘We’re here for Tommy Robinson’ and ‘Leave our Tommy alone’. One supporter carried a sign reading: ‘The Nazis blindly followed orders. Will the police do the same.’ 

Supporters, who also included a man wearing a Union flag suit, chanted ‘Shame on you’ as police officers surrounded a man and marched him away this morning.

Dame Victoria and Mr Justice Warby found Robinson was in contempt in three respects when he filmed men accused of the sexual exploitation of young girls and live-streamed the footage on Facebook, in breach of a reporting ban, outside Leeds Crown Court in May 2018.

Giving reasons for the decision on Tuesday, Dame Victoria said Robinson encouraged ‘vigilante action’ in the video, which lasted an hour-and-a-half and was viewed online 250,000 times on the morning of the broadcast.

The judge said the words he used in the video would have been understood by viewers as ‘an incitement’ to harass the defendants and ‘gave rise to a real risk the course of justice would be seriously impeded’.

Throughout the Old Bailey hearing, Robinson denied any wrongdoing, saying he did not believe he was breaching reporting restrictions and only referred to information that was already in the public domain. 

Robinson wore a black T-shirt today, which said 'convicted of journalism' on the front and 'Britain = North Korea' on the back

Robinson wore a black T-shirt today, which said ‘convicted of journalism’ on the front and ‘Britain = North Korea’ on the back

Robinson arrives at the Old Bailey this morning be sentenced for contempt of court over a video he broadcast online

Robinson arrives at the Old Bailey this morning be sentenced for contempt of court over a video he broadcast online

A man with a microphone addressed the crowd today, saying: 'We're here for Tommy Robinson' and 'Leave our Tommy alone'

A man with a microphone addressed the crowd today, saying: ‘We’re here for Tommy Robinson’ and ‘Leave our Tommy alone’

Stand Up To Racism demonstrators stand outside the Old Bailey in London as Robinson arrives for his sentencing today

Stand Up To Racism demonstrators stand outside the Old Bailey in London as Robinson arrives for his sentencing today

Tommy Robinson outside Leeds Crown Court

Tommy Robinson leaving the Old Bailey in London on July 5

Robinson (right, pictured in London after the court finding last Friday) was found to have been in contempt when he filmed men accused of sexual exploitation and live-streamed the footage on Facebook outside Leeds Crown Court in May 2018 (left)

But Dame Victoria and Mr Justice Warby found he was in contempt by breaching the reporting restriction imposed on the trial, by live-streaming the video from outside the public entrance to the court and by ‘aggressively confronting and filming’ some of the defendants.

Timeline of the Tommy Robinson contempt of court case 

May 25, 2018: Robinson is jailed for 13 months for contempt of court after Facebook Live protest outside a trial in Leeds.

May 27, 2018: Sentence sparks protests in London including outside Downing Street.

July 18, 2018: Robinson launches appeal.

August 1, 2018: Judges order his release and say he must face new hearing.

September 27, 2018: A new contempt of court case at the Old Bailey is adjourned after Judge Nicholas Hilliard QC asks for written submissions from all parties.

October 19, 2018: The Huddersfield grooming case is fully reported after the conclusion of all the trials.

October 23, 2018: After considering submissions, judge says case is ‘too complex’ and evidence must be considered by Attorney General.

March 7, 2019: Attorney General decides the case should be reheard.

May 14, 2019: High Court judges rule he will face new contempt of court proceedings 

July 5, 2019: Robinson is found guilty

A number of Robinson’s supporters who gathered outside the court on Thursday and Friday reacted angrily after the result was announced.

Robinson broadcast the footage while the jury in the second of a series of linked grooming trials was considering its verdict.

The video was eventually viewed 3.4 million times after being shared following his arrest. 

A reporting restriction was in place which postponed the publication of any details of the case until the end of all the trials involving 29 people, in a bid to ensure all defendants received a fair trial. 

Robinson was jailed for 13 months after being found in contempt of court on the day of the broadcast.

He served two months in jail before being freed after the original finding of contempt was overturned by the Court of Appeal in August 2018.

But the case was then referred back to the Attorney General, who announced in March that it was in the public interest to bring fresh proceedings against Robinson.

Dame Victoria and Mr Justice Warby gave permission for the Attorney General to bring a new case against Robinson at a hearing in May.

Anyone found in contempt of court can be jailed for up to two years, receive an unlimited fine, or both.

In an appearance on the far-right conspiracy theory website InfoWars on Monday, Robinson asked US President Donald Trump to grant him asylum in America, claiming he faced being killed in prison if he was jailed.

Other contempt cases punished by courts since 2002

Tommy Robinson will be sentenced for committing contempt of court by filming defendants in a criminal trial in breach of a reporting ban. The courts have punished previous incidents of contempt of court in a number of cases:

– In April 2002, publishers of the Sunday Mirror were ordered to pay more than £129,000 in fines and costs for running an article which led to the collapse of the first trial of Leeds United footballers Jonathan Woodgate and Lee Bowyer, who faced charges arising out of the assault of an Asian student. The newspaper carried an interview with the alleged victim’s father while the jury was still considering its verdict. Woodgate was convicted of affray following a second trial, while Bowyer was cleared.

– In June 2011, Joanne Fraill was jailed for eight months after becoming the first juror to be prosecuted for contempt of court. She admitted chatting on Facebook with an acquitted defendant in a complex multi-million pound drug trial while the jury was still deliberating in the cases of three other defendants. The then Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, and two other senior judges used the case to warn jurors generally not to undermine the country’s ‘precious jury system’ by discussing or researching their cases online. When Lord Judge announced her sentence, Fraill, from Blackley, Manchester, cried ‘Eight months!’ and put her head on the table in front of her at London’s High Court and sobbed. 

– In July 2011, two newspapers were fined over their reporting in the wake of the murder of Bristol landscape architect Joanna Yeates, which were found to have created ‘substantial risks to the course of justice’. Contempt proceedings were brought against the Daily Mirror and The Sun over stories published following the arrest of Miss Yeates’s landlord Christopher Jefferies on suspicion of her murder in December 2010. Mr Jeffries was later proved to be ‘entirely innocent’ and Ms Yeates’s neighbour Vincent Tabak was jailed for life for her murder. Three leading judges in London handed out a £50,000 penalty to the Daily Mirror and one of £18,000 to The Sun. 

– In July 2016, 19-year-old Damien Parker-Stokes was locked up for 15 months for taking photographs at Bristol Crown Court as his friend Ryan Sheppard was being jailed for murder. Parker-Stokes had posted the photographs on Facebook and ‘glorified’ Sheppard, who was jailed for life for the 2013 murder of engineer Mark Roberts.

– In March 2019, actress Tina Malone was handed an eight-month suspended sentence and was ordered to pay £10,000 costs for sharing a Facebook post said to unmask James Bulger killer Jon Venables. The Shameless star admitted breaching a ban on publishing anything that purportedly reveals the new identity of Venables.

Read more at DailyMail.co.uk