Samantha Ayres, 34, (pictured) had made four phone calls and was in conversation with a friend when she veered onto the wrong side of the road and hurtled into David Kirk, 26
A teaching assistant, who drifted on to the wrong side of the road and killed a motorcyclist while talking to a friend using a hands-free device, has been jailed for three years.
Samantha Ayres, 34, had made four phone calls and was in mid-conversation with a friend when she veered onto the wrong side of the road and hurtled into David Kirk, 26. He died at the scene.
Ayres, from Horncastle, claimed she lost control of her Ford Fiesta when her rear passenger tyre went on to the verge on a rural road in Lincolnshire.
But police experts found no evidence on the road for her explanation.
Using hands free is not illegal but, in a landmark case, prosecutors argued she was distracted by the call.
Ayres broke down in tears when a jury returned a guilty verdict at Lincoln Crown Court last week.
And today, she was jailed for three years after saying she was most probably distracted by her long phone call.
Passing sentence, Judge Pini told Ayres: ‘You had left work at Boston and at 5.34pm you were making the fourth of a series of hands free telephone calls. This final one lasted 27 minutes and you were still making it at the time of the fatal crash.
‘You collided head on with David Kirk and you were completely on the wrong side of the road.
‘You pleaded guilty to causing death by careless driving. The basis of your plea was that your rear nearside tyre contacted the verge which set in train a series of events causing you to lose control of your car.
‘The jury rejected your account and accepted that you were distracted by using your hands free phone. In my judgement your account of how this happened was dishonest. You were simply on the wrong side of the road.
‘The fact is you were so distracted , most probably by the long phone call, that you were not paying attention properly to the road and to other road users.
‘The evidence from Mrs Kirk as to the effect this tragedy has had on her and her young child was utterly heart-breaking.
‘She and her husband had been married for five years and had all of the future to look forward to together. Your actions have left her without a husband, and their very young daughter without a father. His mother has lost a son and his sister her brother.’
Ayres was also banned from driving for four and half years and must take an extended retest.
The judge added ‘This is not a landmark case. The evidence is that you were on the wrong side of the road and to drive in such a way is dangerous in the absence of good reason.
David Kirk, 26, pictured on his wedding day with his wife Katie, 26, died at the scene
The jury were not told that just eight months before the crash Ayres was caught doing 58mph in a 30mph village limit in the same area where Mr Kirk died
‘Given that the jury rejected your account of why you were on the wrong side of the road, the most likely explanation for your driving was avoidable distraction caused by the hands free. Many things may cause avoidable distraction. In this case it just happened to be the use of a hands free device.’
It is not currently against the law to use hands free kits unless you are touching a mobile but both the Highway Code and Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents advise it could be a distraction.
Mr Kirk’s widow, Katie, 26, was in court with other members of his family to watch Ayres sentenced.
The father-of-one, from Lincoln, had worked at a motorcycle dealers in the city since the age of 14 and left a two-year-old daughter, Alyssa.
Afterwards Mrs Kirk said: ‘David was killed in the collision with Mrs Ayres, it wasn’t an accident as the evidence has shown it could have been avoided by simply driving with proper care and attention.
‘As a result of the driving of Mrs Ayres our family now has to live with this tremendous loss. Alyssa had just turned one when her daddy was killed, she has her whole life to live without her daddy.
THE LAW ON USING A HANDS-FREE PHONE WHILE DRIVING
Using a hands-free device while driving is not illegal but, in a landmark case, prosecutors said that Samantha Ayres was distracted by the call when she hit and killed a motorcyclist.
She had made four phone calls and was in mid-conversation with a friend when she veered onto the wrong side of the road and hurtled into David Kirk.
Ayres denied dangerous driving but was found guilty today and now faces jail for the offense.
Although it’s not unlawful, in the Highway Code motorists are advised that it is always safer to stop to make a call.
In the Ayres case, police collision investigator PC Godfrey Barlow told the court that research showed that motorists ‘spend less time looking at the road’ when using one.
He added: ‘The research mentions you visualise the person you are speaking to. It is going to lower your situational awareness.’
The officer told the jury Rule 149 of the Highway Code states ‘using hands free equipment is also likely to distract your attention from the road’.
He said: ‘It is far safer not to use any telephone while you are driving or riding – find a safe place to stop first or use the voicemail facility and listen to messages later’.
In the conclusion to his report he added: ‘Research shows even when a mobile phone is paired to a hands-free device it can still prove a distraction.’
‘As a family we talk about David with Alyssa and she will know what a wonderful man her father is but she will not have any genuine memories about him.’
Mrs Kirk added: ‘This case has had a lot of interest in the press due to the devastating impact it had on the friends and family of David, and the way the collision occurred.
‘In time we will be willing to give further statements to help promote the awareness of bikers, the importance of driving safely and the impact using hands free devices while driving can have. However at this time after sitting through the trial and hearing all the evidence, we would appreciate time to process all of this as a family.’
Ayres, who had been driving for just five years, claimed she lost control of her Ford Fiesta after a rear tyre went on to the verge.
But police experts found no evidence on the road for her explanation.
Collision investigator PC Godfrey Barlow concluded Ayres’ driving had caused the crash and said he could not discount the possibility that the lawful use of a hands free phone for such a period had led to a distraction.
‘The research shows less time is spent looking at the road,’ PC Barlow explained.
When asked how the use of hands free phone differed from talking to a passenger PC Barlow said: ‘The research mentions you visualise the person you are speaking to.’
He added: ‘It is going to lower your situational awareness.’
PC Barlow also highlighted rule 149 of the Highway Code which states: ‘using hands free equipment is also likely to distract your attention from the road. It is far safer not to use any telephone while you are driving or riding – find a safe place to stop first or use the voicemail facility and listen to messages later.’
At the time of the collision Ayres was using a legal hands free system which was fitted to her car and paired to her mobile phone via Bluetooth.
Ayres made four calls using the hands free system after leaving work in Boston, Lincs, at around 5.20pm on 7 November, last year.
The first two calls recorded at 5.21pm and 5.24pm lasted one minute 29 seconds and one minute 19 seconds.
At 5.27pm Ayres made a call of four minutes and 14 seconds to her mother in which she asked to borrow £40.
Ayres then rang friend Marc Lunn at 5.34pm and was still connected to him in the moments before she collided with Mr Kirk on a rural road in Horsington, Lincs.
Mr Lunn remained on the line for a short period after hearing Ayres swear. The length of the call between them was recorded at 27 minutes and 31 seconds.
In a statement read to the jury Mr Lunn, who works for a VW dealership in Derby, said ‘I was sat in my VW when at 17.34 my mobile phone rang.
‘It was Sam. I could tell she was in a car.
‘The conversation was a catch-up about our lives and our families but also about the potential purchase of a VW van.
‘All of a sudden, there was no run-up or warning, there was an outburst from Sam of expletives, and the sound of the car going off the road then silence.
‘I immediately thought an accident had occurred. There was no response. I stayed on the line for 10 or 20 seconds and then ended the call.’
Ayres admitted to police that she had been using a hands free phone and during her evidence said she used her car stereo to make the calls.
She claimed to make the first of the four calls while stationary after finishing work and said some of the others were made while in traffic.
David Kirk suffered fatal injuries in the collision. Police and paramedics tried to save him but he died at the scene
Ayres told the jury she had known Mr Lunn, who was a car dealer, for ‘four or five years’, and she called him while sat at traffic lights because her partner wanted a VW camper van.
‘With Mark being in the business I wanted specifications, what was the best to buy,’ Aryes said.
‘I knew he had twins, a boy and a girl. I asked him about that. We’d had conversations by email, his step-father was poorly.’
Under cross-examination from prosecution barrister, Greg Purcell, Ayres admitted that it was an ‘in-depth’ conversation with Mr Lunn that covered several topics.
Ayres claimed she wasn’t ‘focussed’ on the conversation with Mr Lunn and when asked if the call had distracted her replied:’No,’ adding, ‘not knowingly.’
When asked if it wasn’t the call that distracted her, then what did, she replied: ‘I don’t know.’
Giving evidence Ayres claimed she was still speaking to Mr Lunn when she felt her rear passenger tyre go on to the verge.
Michelle Stuart-Lofthouse, mitigating, said Ayres was genuinely remorseful and had suffered with depression, self loathing and suicidal tendencies since the crash.
Miss Stuart-Lofthouse added: ‘She (Ayres) wishes she could swap her life with Mr Kirk.’
The jury were not told that just eight months before the crash Ayres was caught doing 58mph in a 30mph village limit in the same area where Mr Kirk died.
Ayres signed the speeding declaration after being caught on 16 March 2016 but was not prosecuted because of a computer malfunction in issuing the ticket.
The incident was not revealed to the jury as Judge Pini ruled speed was not a factor in Mr Kirk’s death.