UK Ambassador to US’s memo says he ‘doesn’t believe’ Trump stopped Iran strike as it would kill 150

Leaked memo by British Ambassador to the US reveals he ‘doesn’t believe’ Donald Trump cancelled missile strike on Iran because it would cause 150 casualties and that one more attack ‘could trigger another u-turn’

  • Missile strike by Iran took America to the brink of launching a retaliatory attack
  • But Trump aborted mission with ten minutes to spare after told it might kill 150
  • Sir Kim Darroch described disarray and confusion across Washington at the time

American policy towards Iran is incoherent and unlikely to improve ‘any time soon’, according to a devastating memo by Sir Kim Darroch.

In a damning indictment of Donald Trump’s administration, Britain’s Ambassador to Washington described ’36 hours of contradictory messaging and decisions’ after Iran shot down a US military drone last month.

The missile strike by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard took America to the brink of launching a retaliatory attack. 

But after authorising a strike and boasting of being ‘cocked and loaded’, President Trump aborted the mission with ten minutes to spare after being told that it might kill as many as 150 people. 

The Iranians claimed they had shot down a USAF RQ-4 Global Hawk (pictured), which the U.S. later confirmed. The missile strike by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard took America to the brink of launching a retaliatory attack

In a damning indictment of Donald Trump's administration, Britain's Ambassador to Washington described '36 hours of contradictory messaging and decisions' after Iran shot down a US military drone last month. Pictured: A highly-sophisticated missile will have been deployed to destroy the Navy spy plane (file photo)

In a damning indictment of Donald Trump’s administration, Britain’s Ambassador to Washington described ’36 hours of contradictory messaging and decisions’ after Iran shot down a US military drone last month. Pictured: A highly-sophisticated missile will have been deployed to destroy the Navy spy plane (file photo)

Tensions have been escalating between the US and Iran since May 2018, when Trump announced the US was withdrawing from a nuclear agreement with Iran and was reimposing sanctions on the regime.

The US has blamed Iran for a series of recent attacks on oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman.

In his memo, written at 12.39am UK time on June 22, Sir Kim described disarray and confusion across Washington as Trump unexpectedly aborted the attack.

In his memo, written at 12.39am UK time on June 22, Sir Kim described disarray and confusion across Washington as Trump unexpectedly aborted the attack

In his memo, written at 12.39am UK time on June 22, Sir Kim described disarray and confusion across Washington as Trump unexpectedly aborted the attack

But after authorising a strike and boasting of being 'cocked and loaded', President Trump aborted the mission with ten minutes to spare after being told that it might kill as many as 150 people. The US has also blamed Iran for a series of recent attacks on oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman (pictured)

But after authorising a strike and boasting of being ‘cocked and loaded’, President Trump aborted the mission with ten minutes to spare after being told that it might kill as many as 150 people. The US has also blamed Iran for a series of recent attacks on oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman (pictured)

‘The Administration said nothing for several hours, awaiting guidance from the White House,’ he wrote. ‘Even our best contacts were unwilling to take our calls.’

Sir Kim said the episode illustrated Trump’s ‘aversion to new military adventures’.

But, astonishingly, he made it clear to London that he did not believe the President’s explanation of why he cancelled the attack.

‘His claim, however, that he changed his mind because of 150 predicted casualties doesn’t stand up; he would certainly have heard this figure in his initial briefing.

‘It’s more likely that he was never fully on board and that he was worried about how this apparent reversal of his 2016 campaign promises would look come 2020 [at the next election].’

He warned that this is a ‘divided Administration’ and that ‘it’s unlikely that US policy on Iran is going to become more coherent anytime soon’.

And while Trump had stepped back from the brink this time, Sir Kim warned that the President could still trigger a conflict with Iran, noting that he is now ‘surrounded by a more hawkish group of advisers’.

‘This may, however, only be a temporary pause,’ he warned. ‘Just one more Iranian attack somewhere in the region could trigger yet another Trump U-turn. Moreover, the loss of a single American life would probably make a critical difference.’

Read more at DailyMail.co.uk